StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Apache Wicket vs Vaadin

Apache Wicket vs Vaadin

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket
Stacks61
Followers54
Votes2
Vaadin
Vaadin
Stacks198
Followers279
Votes36
GitHub Stars631
Forks81

Apache Wicket vs Vaadin: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Apache Wicket and Vaadin are outlined below.

1. **Component Model**: Apache Wicket follows a component-oriented model where each component has its own behavior and presentation logic, making it highly reusable. In contrast, Vaadin utilizes a server-side approach where the UI components are created and modified server-side and automatically synchronized to the client-side.
   
2. **Learning Curve**: Apache Wicket is more suitable for developers with a good understanding of Java and object-oriented programming principles due to its component-based architecture. On the other hand, Vaadin provides a more simplistic and intuitive programming model, making it easier for developers new to web development to get started quickly.
   
3. **State Management**: Apache Wicket manages state primarily on the server-side, which can lead to increased server load and slower performance for applications with large amounts of user interactions. Vaadin, on the other hand, employs client-side state management, reducing server load and improving overall performance.
   
4. **Server Communication**: In Apache Wicket, client-server communication occurs through traditional HTTP requests, which can result in additional overhead for frequent interactions. Vaadin uses WebSockets or long-polling mechanisms to facilitate real-time updates and reduce the need for constant request/response cycles.
   
5. **Customization and Extensibility**: Apache Wicket provides extensive support for custom components and behavior extensions, allowing developers to tailor their applications to specific requirements easily. While Vaadin also offers customization capabilities, it may require more effort to create highly specialized components due to its server-side rendering approach.
   
6. **Community Support**: Apache Wicket has a smaller but dedicated community of developers who focus on the evolution and maintenance of the framework. Vaadin, with its larger user base, benefits from a more extensive collection of tutorials, forums, and third-party add-ons, making it easier for developers to find resources and assistance when needed.

## In Summary, Apache Wicket and Vaadin differ in their component model, learning curve, state management, server communication, customization, extensibility, and community support, catering to varying needs and preferences of developers in web application development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Wicket
Apache Wicket
Vaadin
Vaadin

It is a component-based web application framework for the Java programming language conceptually similar to JavaServer Faces and Tapestry.

It is the fastest way to build web applications in Java. It automates the communication between your server and the browser and gives you a high-level component API for all Vaadin components

Just Java & HTML;Secure by Default;AJAX Components;Open Source with Apache License;Maintainable code; JavaEE integration
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
631
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
81
Stacks
61
Stacks
198
Followers
54
Followers
279
Votes
2
Votes
36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Component based
  • 1
    Java
Pros
  • 9
    Java
  • 7
    Compatibility
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Components
  • 3
    Performance
Cons
  • 3
    Paid for more features
Integrations
IntelliJ IDEA
IntelliJ IDEA
JavaScript
JavaScript
HTML5
HTML5
CSS 3
CSS 3
NetBeans IDE
NetBeans IDE
Java 8
Java 8
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Apache Wicket, Vaadin?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase