Alternatives to Aptible logo

Alternatives to Aptible

TrueVault, Heroku, CFEngine, and Accountable are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Aptible.
26
21
+ 1
0

What is Aptible and what are its top alternatives?

Aptible is the world’s first application deployment platform built to automate HIPAA compliance for web and mobile technology. Run the applications and databases of your choice. Seamlessly integrate advanced compliance tools with the platform to generate all of the documentation, audit logs, and explanatory materials you need to demonstrate compliance with every aspect of HIPAA.
Aptible is a tool in the Compliance category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Aptible

  • TrueVault

    TrueVault

    TrueVault was built to help startups simplify the complexities of HIPAA. TrueVault will save you hundreds of dev hours. Focus on building your software's core functionality, and let TrueVault protect your data at HIPAA-security levels. ...

  • Heroku

    Heroku

    Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling. ...

  • CFEngine

    CFEngine

    It is an IT infrastructure automation and Continuous Operations framework that helps engineers, system administrators and other stakeholders in an IT organization manage IT infrastructure while ensuring service levels and compliance ...

  • Accountable

    Accountable

    Accountable provides a guided walk through to ensure that you are doing everything you need in order to safely say that you are HIPAA compliant. ...

Aptible alternatives & related posts

TrueVault logo

TrueVault

3
9
0
HIPAA compliant Database as a Service
3
9
+ 1
0
PROS OF TRUEVAULT
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF TRUEVAULT
      Be the first to leave a con

      related TrueVault posts

      Heroku logo

      Heroku

      20.4K
      16.1K
      3.2K
      Build, deliver, monitor and scale web apps and APIs with a trail blazing developer experience.
      20.4K
      16.1K
      + 1
      3.2K
      PROS OF HEROKU
      • 703
        Easy deployment
      • 460
        Free for side projects
      • 374
        Huge time-saver
      • 348
        Simple scaling
      • 261
        Low devops skills required
      • 190
        Easy setup
      • 174
        Add-ons for almost everything
      • 154
        Beginner friendly
      • 150
        Better for startups
      • 133
        Low learning curve
      • 48
        Postgres hosting
      • 41
        Easy to add collaborators
      • 30
        Faster development
      • 24
        Awesome documentation
      • 19
        Simple rollback
      • 19
        Focus on product, not deployment
      • 15
        Natural companion for rails development
      • 15
        Easy integration
      • 12
        Great customer support
      • 8
        GitHub integration
      • 6
        Painless & well documented
      • 6
        No-ops
      • 4
        Free
      • 4
        I love that they make it free to launch a side project
      • 3
        Just works
      • 3
        Great UI
      • 2
        PostgreSQL forking and following
      • 2
        MySQL extension
      • 1
        Able to host stuff good like Discord Bot
      • 0
        Sec
      • 0
        Security
      CONS OF HEROKU
      • 23
        Super expensive
      • 6
        Not a whole lot of flexibility
      • 5
        No usable MySQL option
      • 5
        Storage
      • 4
        Low performance on free tier
      • 1
        24/7 support is $1,000 per month

      related Heroku posts

      Russel Werner
      Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 30 upvotes · 1.5M views

      StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

      Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

      #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

      See more
      Simon Reymann
      Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 28 upvotes · 3.5M views

      Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

      • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
      • Respectively Git as revision control system
      • SourceTree as Git GUI
      • Visual Studio Code as IDE
      • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
      • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
      • SonarQube as quality gate
      • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
      • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
      • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
      • Heroku for deploying in test environments
      • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
      • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
      • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
      • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
      • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

      The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

      • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
      • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
      • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
      • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
      • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
      • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
      See more
      CFEngine logo

      CFEngine

      7
      21
      0
      IT Automation at WebScale
      7
      21
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF CFENGINE
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF CFENGINE
          Be the first to leave a con

          related CFEngine posts

          Accountable logo

          Accountable

          4
          5
          0
          HIPAA Compliance, Made Easy
          4
          5
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF ACCOUNTABLE
            Be the first to leave a pro
            CONS OF ACCOUNTABLE
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Accountable posts