StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. ArangoDB vs OrientDB

ArangoDB vs OrientDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ArangoDB
ArangoDB
Stacks273
Followers442
Votes192
OrientDB
OrientDB
Stacks77
Followers107
Votes14

ArangoDB vs OrientDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

ArangoDB and OrientDB are both multi-model databases that provide flexibility in dealing with different types of data. However, there are key differences between the two that distinguish them in terms of performance, scalability, query language, and data modeling capabilities.

  1. Performance: ArangoDB uses memory-mapped architecture, which allows it to effectively manage large datasets and offers better performance for read-intensive workloads. On the other hand, OrientDB utilizes a disk-based storage approach that provides better support for write-intensive scenarios.

  2. Scalability: ArangoDB offers horizontal scalability through its built-in sharding mechanism, allowing users to distribute data across multiple servers effortlessly. In contrast, OrientDB relies on vertical scalability, where a single server can handle larger datasets by expanding its storage or computing resources vertically.

  3. Query Language: ArangoDB uses a declarative query language called AQL (ArangoDB Query Language), which provides a SQL-like syntax with additional graph traversal and document-oriented features. OrientDB, on the other hand, supports SQL queries as well as a powerful proprietary language called Gremlin, which is used for graph traversals.

  4. Data Modeling: ArangoDB supports a native graph database model as well as key-value and document stores, allowing users to flexibly model their data to suit different use cases. In contrast, OrientDB is primarily designed as a graph database but supports document and key-value models as well.

  5. Multi-Model Capabilities: While both databases are multi-model, ArangoDB places a stronger emphasis on its ability to seamlessly combine different data models within a single query. It provides better integration through its traversal mechanisms, making it easier to work with complex relationships. OrientDB, although supporting multiple models, is primarily optimized for graph operations.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: ArangoDB has gained popularity in recent years, attracting a widespread community and a vibrant ecosystem of compatible tools and libraries. OrientDB, while also having a dedicated user base, has faced some challenges with community adoption and maintained support, leading to a relatively smaller ecosystem.

In summary, ArangoDB and OrientDB differ in terms of performance, scalability, query language, data modeling capabilities, multi-model support, and community ecosystem. These differences make them suitable for various use cases depending on the specific requirements and preferences of the users.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ArangoDB
ArangoDB
OrientDB
OrientDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

It is an open source NoSQL database management system written in Java. It is a Multi-model database, supporting graph, document, key/value, and object models, but the relationships are managed as in graph databases with direct connections between records.

multi-model nosql db; acid; transactions; javascript; database; nosql; sharding; replication; query language; joins; aql; documents; graphs; key-values; graphdb
-
Statistics
Stacks
273
Stacks
77
Followers
442
Followers
107
Votes
192
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Grahps and documents in one DB
  • 26
    Intuitive and rich query language
  • 25
    Good documentation
  • 25
    Open source
  • 21
    Joins for collections
Cons
  • 3
    Web ui has still room for improvement
  • 2
    No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL
Pros
  • 4
    Great graphdb
  • 2
    Great support
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Rest api
  • 1
    Embeddable
Cons
  • 4
    Unstable

What are some alternatives to ArangoDB, OrientDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase