AWS DeepRacer vs OpenVINO

Overview

OpenVINO

Stacks15

Followers32

Votes0

AWS DeepRacer

Stacks3

Followers6

Votes0

AWS DeepRacer vs OpenVINO: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between AWS DeepRacer and OpenVINO.

Machine Learning Frameworks: AWS DeepRacer is built on the reinforcement learning framework, allowing users to train models through self-play and racing simulations. OpenVINO, on the other hand, is an open-source toolkit designed for optimizing and deploying deep learning models on various Intel hardware platforms.
Training Environment: AWS DeepRacer provides a cloud-based training environment where users can easily access resources and scale up their training workloads. In contrast, OpenVINO requires users to set up their own local environment for model training and deployment.
Hardware Support: AWS DeepRacer is specifically tailored for the DeepRacer car, which comes equipped with the necessary sensors, actuators, and compute power for training and racing. OpenVINO, on the other hand, supports a wide range of Intel-based hardware platforms, allowing for more flexibility in deployment options.
Community and Resources: AWS DeepRacer has a dedicated community of developers and enthusiasts who actively participate in races, challenges, and forums, providing a rich source of learning and collaboration. OpenVINO also has a supportive community but may not be as specialized towards autonomous racing applications.
Ease of Deployment: AWS DeepRacer offers a seamless deployment process on the AWS cloud infrastructure, providing easy scaling and management capabilities. OpenVINO, while powerful, may require more manual configuration and setup for deployment on different hardware architectures.
Cost Considerations: AWS DeepRacer involves costs for cloud computing resources, training simulations, and physical DeepRacer car purchases. OpenVINO, being an open-source toolkit, is more cost-effective in terms of software licensing but may incur costs related to hardware setup and maintenance.

In Summary, AWS DeepRacer and OpenVINO differ in terms of machine learning frameworks, training environments, hardware support, community resources, ease of deployment, and cost considerations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenVINO	AWS DeepRacer
It is a comprehensive toolkit for quickly developing applications and solutions that emulate human vision. Based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), the toolkit extends CV workloads across Intel® hardware, maximizing performance.	Developers of all skill levels can get hands on with machine learning through a cloud based 3D racing simulator, fully autonomous 1/18th scale race car driven by reinforcement learning, and global racing league.
Optimize and deploy deep learning solutions across multiple Intel® platforms; Accelerate and optimize low-level, image-processing capabilities using the OpenCV library; Maximize the performance of your application for any type of processor	A fun way to learn machine learning; Master the basics with time-trial racing; Expand your skills with head-to-head racing
Statistics
Stacks 15	Stacks 3
Followers 32	Followers 6
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to OpenVINO, AWS DeepRacer?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

AWS DeepRacer vs OpenVINO: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between AWS DeepRacer and OpenVINO.

Machine Learning Frameworks: AWS DeepRacer is built on the reinforcement learning framework, allowing users to train models through self-play and racing simulations. OpenVINO, on the other hand, is an open-source toolkit designed for optimizing and deploying deep learning models on various Intel hardware platforms.
Training Environment: AWS DeepRacer provides a cloud-based training environment where users can easily access resources and scale up their training workloads. In contrast, OpenVINO requires users to set up their own local environment for model training and deployment.
Hardware Support: AWS DeepRacer is specifically tailored for the DeepRacer car, which comes equipped with the necessary sensors, actuators, and compute power for training and racing. OpenVINO, on the other hand, supports a wide range of Intel-based hardware platforms, allowing for more flexibility in deployment options.
Community and Resources: AWS DeepRacer has a dedicated community of developers and enthusiasts who actively participate in races, challenges, and forums, providing a rich source of learning and collaboration. OpenVINO also has a supportive community but may not be as specialized towards autonomous racing applications.
Ease of Deployment: AWS DeepRacer offers a seamless deployment process on the AWS cloud infrastructure, providing easy scaling and management capabilities. OpenVINO, while powerful, may require more manual configuration and setup for deployment on different hardware architectures.
Cost Considerations: AWS DeepRacer involves costs for cloud computing resources, training simulations, and physical DeepRacer car purchases. OpenVINO, being an open-source toolkit, is more cost-effective in terms of software licensing but may incur costs related to hardware setup and maintenance.

In Summary, AWS DeepRacer and OpenVINO differ in terms of machine learning frameworks, training environments, hardware support, community resources, ease of deployment, and cost considerations.

AWS DeepRacer vs OpenVINO

Overview

AWS DeepRacer vs OpenVINO: What are the differences?