Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Postman vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?
Postman and Swagger UI are widely used tools in API development and testing. Postman provides a comprehensive API development environment, while Swagger UI focuses on API documentation and visualization.
User Interface: Postman provides a user-friendly interface with a wide range of features, including request creation, response visualization, and test automation capabilities. It offers a graphical interface that simplifies the creation, sending, and management of API requests. In contrast, Swagger UI primarily focuses on API documentation, offering an interactive and visually appealing interface for exploring and testing APIs.
Request Building and Testing: Postman offers a robust set of features for creating and sending API requests. It provides a variety of request methods, authentication options, and parameter customization. Postman also allows for automated testing and the creation of test scripts. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is primarily focused on API documentation and visualization, providing a read-only interface for exploring and interacting with APIs.
API Documentation: Swagger UI is a dedicated tool for API documentation, using the OpenAPI Specification (OAS) to document RESTful APIs in a standardized format. It simplifies the process by automatically generating documentation from the API definition, facilitating sharing and maintenance of API documentation. On the other hand, Postman, while having some documentation capabilities, is not as focused on this aspect as Swagger UI.
Collaboration and Teamwork: Postman provides collaboration features, allowing team members to work together on API development, testing, and documentation. It offers features like shared workspaces, version control, and team collaboration tools. Swagger UI, on the other hand, focuses more on individual API documentation and visualization and may require additional tools or platforms for collaboration among team members.
Ecosystem and Integrations: Postman has a thriving ecosystem with a wide range of integrations and extensions, making it a versatile tool for API development and testing. It integrates with popular development tools, source control systems, and continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines. Swagger UI, while it offers some integrations, has a more limited ecosystem compared to Postman.
In summary, Postman is a comprehensive API development environment with a user-friendly interface, robust testing capabilities, and extensive collaboration features. It excels in request building, automation, and team collaboration. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is primarily focused on API documentation and visualization, providing a visually appealing interface for exploring and sharing API documentation based on the OpenAPI Specification. It is well-suited for generating interactive API documentation but lacks the extensive testing and collaboration features of Postman.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Postman supports automation and organization in a way that Insomnia just doesn't. Admittedly, Insomnia makes it slightly easy to query the data that you get back (in a very MongoDB-esque query language) but Postman sets you up to develop the code that you would use in development/testing right in the editor.
Pros of Postman
- Easy to use490
- Great tool369
- Makes developing rest api's easy peasy276
- Easy setup, looks good156
- The best api workflow out there144
- It's the best53
- History feature53
- Adds real value to my workflow44
- Great interface that magically predicts your needs43
- The best in class app35
- Can save and share script12
- Fully featured without looking cluttered10
- Collections8
- Option to run scrips8
- Global/Environment Variables8
- Shareable Collections7
- Dead simple and useful. Excellent7
- Dark theme easy on the eyes7
- Awesome customer support6
- Great integration with newman6
- Documentation5
- Simple5
- The test script is useful5
- Saves responses4
- This has simplified my testing significantly4
- Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,34
- Easy as pie4
- API-network3
- I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis3
- Mocking API calls with predefined response3
- Now supports GraphQL2
- Postman Runner CI Integration2
- Easy to setup, test and provides test storage2
- Continuous integration using newman2
- Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable2
- Runner2
- Graph2
- <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>1
Pros of Swagger UI
- Open Source49
- Can execute api calls from the documentation34
- Free to use29
- Customizable19
- Easy to implement in .Net14
- Mature, clean spec13
- API Visualization12
- Coverage9
- Scaffolding6
- Easy to use6
- Vibrant and active community5
- Elegant4
- Adopted by tm forum api3
- Clear for React2
- Api1
- Can deploy API to AWS API Gateway and AWS Lambda1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Postman
- Stores credentials in HTTP10
- Bloated features and UI9
- Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens8
- Poor GraphQL support7
- Expensive5
- Not free after 5 users3
- Can't prompt for per-request variables3
- Import swagger1
- Support websocket1
- Import curl1
Cons of Swagger UI
- Need to learn YAML and RAML3
- Documentation doesn't look that good2
- Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages1
- You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting1
- Does not support hypermedia1