Overview

GitHub

Stacks296.5K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.3K

Bitbucket

Stacks41.4K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

AWS CodeCommit

Stacks332

Followers826

Votes193

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub: What are the differences?

Key Differences between AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub

Ownership: One key difference between AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub is the ownership of the platform. AWS CodeCommit is owned and maintained by Amazon Web Services, Bitbucket is owned by Atlassian, and GitHub is owned by Microsoft.
Integration: Another difference is the level of integration with other services. AWS CodeCommit is tightly integrated with other AWS services such as AWS CodePipeline and AWS CodeBuild, making it a seamless choice for users already using AWS infrastructure. Bitbucket offers integration with popular tools like Jira and Confluence, making it a preferred choice for Atlassian users. GitHub provides extensive integration with third-party applications and services, making it a highly flexible platform.
Pricing: Pricing is another differentiating factor. AWS CodeCommit follows an AWS pricing model based on the number of active users, repositories, and data transfer. Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans with different feature sets and pricing tiers based on the number of users. GitHub offers a similar pricing model, with free plans for individual users and paid plans for organizations with additional features and collaboration tools.
On-premises Deployment: One important difference is the availability of on-premises deployment options. AWS CodeCommit is a fully managed service and does not provide on-premises deployment options. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers both cloud-hosted and self-hosted options, allowing organizations to deploy it on their own servers. GitHub offers a hybrid deployment option with GitHub Enterprise, allowing organizations to have their own self-hosted instance.
Community Support: The level of community support is also different across the platforms. AWS CodeCommit is primarily used by AWS customers and has a smaller community compared to Bitbucket and GitHub. Bitbucket has a larger community, particularly among Atlassian users, with a wide range of available resources and community support. GitHub has the largest and most active community, making it the go-to platform for open source projects.
Security and Compliance: Finally, there are differences in terms of security and compliance features. AWS CodeCommit offers robust security features such as encryption in transit and at rest, integration with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM), and compliance with various industry standards. Bitbucket also provides strong security features, including encryption and access control, but lacks some of the advanced compliance capabilities of AWS CodeCommit. GitHub offers similar security features with encryption and access control, but compliance features may vary depending on the deployment options.

In Summary, AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub differ in terms of ownership, integration, pricing, deployment options, community support, and security features. Each platform caters to different user needs and preferences, making it important to evaluate these differences before selecting the most suitable platform for your development projects.

🔥 Trending in Code Collaboration on StackShare

Glide

Code Collaboration

AI-assisted technical design docs

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

0

8

Advice on GitHub, Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

623k views623k

Comments

Phillip

Developer at Coach Align

Mar 18, 2021

Decided

Both of us are far more familiar with GitHub than Gitlab, and so for our first big project together decided to go with what we know here instead of figuring out something new (there are so many new things we need to figure out, might as well reduce the number of optionally new things, lol). We aren't currently taking advantage of GitHub Actions or very many other built-in features (besides Dependabot) but luckily it integrates very well with the other services we're using.

409k views409k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	Bitbucket	AWS CodeCommit
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Collaboration;Encryption;Access Control;High Availability and Durability;Unlimited Repositories;Easy Access and Integration
Statistics
Stacks 296.5K	Stacks 41.4K	Stacks 332
Followers 259.0K	Followers 33.4K	Followers 826
Votes 10.3K	Votes 2.8K	Votes 193
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 44 Free private repos 26 IAM integration 24 Pay-As-You-Go Pricing 20 Amazon feels the most Secure 19 Repo data encrypted at rest Cons 12 UI sucks 4 SLOW 3 No Issue Tracker 2 NO LFS support 2 No webhooks
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Git Jenkins

What are some alternatives to GitHub, Bitbucket, AWS CodeCommit?

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.