Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub: What are the differences?
AWS CodeCommit is a cloud-based repository management system for storing and management of assets. The assets can be source code, binary files, and documents. Offers full compatibility to Git as well, allowing you to move your local repositories to cloud-based repositories in CodeCommit. Bitbucket allows integrations with different sources. A web-based version-control-repository hosting service owned by Atlassian, Bitbucket is used extensively for source code and development projects that use either Mercurial or Git revision control systems. Github is now an industry as well as a coding norm. Easy to use, intuitive, accessible, with the simplest of user interfaces. Almost every open source system uses Git these days.
Decisions about AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub
Elmar Wouters
CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media · | 7 upvotes · 77.7K views
I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.
I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.
Weverton Timoteo
CTO at SourceLevel · | 14 upvotes · 305.5K views
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Weverton Timoteo
CTO at SourceLevel · | 15 upvotes · 250.8K views
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
Pros of AWS CodeCommit
Pros of Bitbucket
Pros of GitHub
Pros of AWS CodeCommit
- Free private repos43
- IAM integration26
- Pay-As-You-Go Pricing23
- Amazon feels the most Secure19
- Repo data encrypted at rest18
- Faster deployments when using other AWS services11
- I can make repository by myself if I have AWS account11
- AWS CodePipeline integration7
- Codebuild integration6
- Does not support web hooks yet! :(6
- Cost Effective4
- Elastic Beanstalk Integration2
- No Git LFS! Dealbreaker for me2
- Integrated with AWS Ecosystem2
- Integration via SQS/SNS for events (replaces webhooks)1
- Open source friendly1
- Issue tracker1
- IAM1
- Only US Region1
- Available in Ireland (Dublin) region1
- CodeDeploy Integration1
- CodeCommit Trigger for an AWS Lambda Function1
- Ui0
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos904
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools345
- Unlimited private repositories340
- Affordable git hosting239
- Integrates with many apis and services122
- Reliable uptime118
- Nice gui85
- Pull requests and code reviews83
- Very customisable57
- Mercurial repositories15
- SourceTree integration13
- JIRA integration10
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA9
- Best free alternative to Github7
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Deployment hooks7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows6
- Source Code Insight5
- Create a wiki4
- Price4
- Login with Google4
- Approve pull request button4
- Customizable pipelines3
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA3
- Also supports Mercurial2
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost2
- Continuous Integration and Delivery2
- Mercurial Support1
- IAM1
- Issues tracker1
- Open source friendly1
- Teamcity1
- Multilingual interface1
- Academic license program1
- IAM integration1
- Free Private Repositories0
Pros of GitHub
- Open source friendly1.8K
- Easy source control1.5K
- Nice UI1.2K
- Great for team collaboration1.1K
- Easy setup858
- Issue tracker495
- Great community477
- Remote team collaboration474
- Great way to share443
- Pull request and features planning435
- Just works138
- Integrated in many tools123
- Free Public Repos111
- Github Gists105
- Github pages102
- Easy to find repos80
- Open source59
- Easy to find projects58
- Network effect56
- It's free54
- Extensive API46
- Organizations42
- Branching41
- Developer Profiles33
- Git Powered Wikis31
- Great for collaboration29
- Community SDK involvement22
- It's fun22
- Clean interface and good integrations21
- Learn from others source code18
- Because: Git14
- It integrates directly with Azure14
- Wide acceptance13
- Large community9
- Newsfeed9
- Standard in Open Source collab9
- It integrates directly with Hipchat8
- Fast7
- Beautiful user experience7
- Cloud SCM6
- Easy to discover new code libraries6
- Nice API5
- It's awesome5
- Integrations5
- Graphs5
- Smooth integration5
- Reliable4
- Remarkable uptime4
- Hands down best online Git service available4
- Loved by developers3
- Security options3
- Easy to use and collaborate with others3
- Simple but powerful3
- Uses GIT3
- Unlimited Public Repos at no cost3
- Version Control3
- CI Integration3
- Quick Onboarding3
- Free HTML hosting3
- Nice to use2
- Ci1
- Easy to use1
- Issues tracker1
- IAM integration1
- Easy deployment via SSH1
- IAM1
- Good tools support1
- All in one development service1
- Free private repos1
- Easy source control and everything is backed up1
- Leads the copycats1
- Never dethroned1
- Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects1
- Beautiful1
- Free HTML hostings1
- Self Hosted1
- Profound0
- 10
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of AWS CodeCommit
Cons of Bitbucket
Cons of GitHub
Cons of AWS CodeCommit
- UI sucks10
- No Issue Tracker3
- SLOW3
- Bad diffing/no blame2
- No fork2
- No webhooks2
- NO LFS support1
- Can't download file from UI1
- Only time based triggers1
- Accident-prone UI0
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy14
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of GitHub
- Owned by micrcosoft43
- Expensive for lone developers that want private repos36
- Relatively slow product/feature release cadence15
- API scoping could be better10
- Only 3 collaborators for private repos8
- Limited featureset for issue management3
- GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions2
- Have to use a token for the package registry1
- No multilingual interface1
- Takes a long time to commit1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is AWS CodeCommit?
CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.
What is Bitbucket?
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
What is GitHub?
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub as a desired skillset
What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
What companies use Bitbucket?
What companies use GitHub?
What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
What companies use Bitbucket?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
What tools integrate with Bitbucket?
What tools integrate with GitHub?
What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
What tools integrate with GitHub?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+11 2
1481
+3 2
925
+2 6
863
+4 3
492
+12 5
2995
+17 12
5504
+32 17
4399
+12 9
2190
What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub?
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
SVN (Subversion)
Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
Interest over time
How much does AWS CodeCommit cost?
How much does Bitbucket cost?
How much does GitHub cost?
News about AWS CodeCommit
More newsNews about Bitbucket
Introducing a New Pull Request Sidebar
(bitbucket.org)
Jan 15, 2021
Manual steps in parallel groups available for Pipelines
(bitbucket.org)
Dec 16, 2020
Introducing a New Pull Request Status in Bitbucket Cloud: Changes Requested
(bitbucket.org)
Dec 11, 2020
Docker Hub rate limits in Bitbucket Pipelines
(bitbucket.org)
Oct 30, 2020
Performance Improvements, Reliability, and Feature Flag Mishaps
(bitbucket.org)
Oct 28, 2020
News about GitHub
2020 Transparency Report
(github.blog)
1 day ago
The little bug that couldn’t: Securing OpenSSL
(github.blog)
1 day ago
Hello from GitHub’s new Chief Security Officer
(github.blog)
2 days ago
Let’s talk about tech internships
(github.blog)
2 days ago
Black History Month Spotlight: Honoring Black creators, activists, and community builders
(github.blog)
2 days ago