AWS CodeCommit聽vs聽Bitbucket聽vs聽GitHub

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

AWS CodeCommit

260
546
+ 1
188
Bitbucket

27.5K
20.7K
+ 1
2.8K
GitHub

147.2K
114.6K
+ 1
10.2K

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub: What are the differences?

AWS CodeCommit is a cloud-based repository management system for storing and management of assets. The assets can be source code, binary files, and documents. Offers full compatibility to Git as well, allowing you to move your local repositories to cloud-based repositories in CodeCommit. Bitbucket allows integrations with different sources. A web-based version-control-repository hosting service owned by Atlassian, Bitbucket is used extensively for source code and development projects that use either Mercurial or Git revision control systems. Github is now an industry as well as a coding norm. Easy to use, intuitive, accessible, with the simplest of user interfaces. Almost every open source system uses Git these days.

Decisions about AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub
Elmar Wouters
CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media | 7 upvotes 路 77.7K views

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Pros of AWS CodeCommit
Pros of Bitbucket
Pros of GitHub
  • 43
    Free private repos
  • 26
    IAM integration
  • 23
    Pay-As-You-Go Pricing
  • 19
    Amazon feels the most Secure
  • 18
    Repo data encrypted at rest
  • 11
    Faster deployments when using other AWS services
  • 11
    I can make repository by myself if I have AWS account
  • 7
    AWS CodePipeline integration
  • 6
    Codebuild integration
  • 6
    Does not support web hooks yet! :(
  • 4
    Cost Effective
  • 2
    Elastic Beanstalk Integration
  • 2
    No Git LFS! Dealbreaker for me
  • 2
    Integrated with AWS Ecosystem
  • 1
    Integration via SQS/SNS for events (replaces webhooks)
  • 1
    Open source friendly
  • 1
    Issue tracker
  • 1
    IAM
  • 1
    Only US Region
  • 1
    Available in Ireland (Dublin) region
  • 1
    CodeDeploy Integration
  • 1
    CodeCommit Trigger for an AWS Lambda Function
  • 0
    Ui
  • 904
    Free private repos
  • 397
    Simple setup
  • 345
    Nice ui and tools
  • 340
    Unlimited private repositories
  • 239
    Affordable git hosting
  • 122
    Integrates with many apis and services
  • 118
    Reliable uptime
  • 85
    Nice gui
  • 83
    Pull requests and code reviews
  • 57
    Very customisable
  • 15
    Mercurial repositories
  • 13
    SourceTree integration
  • 10
    JIRA integration
  • 9
    Track every commit to an issue in JIRA
  • 7
    Best free alternative to Github
  • 7
    Automatically share repositories with all your teammates
  • 7
    Deployment hooks
  • 6
    Compatible with Mac and Windows
  • 5
    Source Code Insight
  • 4
    Create a wiki
  • 4
    Price
  • 4
    Login with Google
  • 4
    Approve pull request button
  • 3
    Customizable pipelines
  • 3
    #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA
  • 2
    Also supports Mercurial
  • 2
    Unlimited Private Repos at no cost
  • 2
    Continuous Integration and Delivery
  • 1
    Mercurial Support
  • 1
    IAM
  • 1
    Issues tracker
  • 1
    Open source friendly
  • 1
    Teamcity
  • 1
    Multilingual interface
  • 1
    Academic license program
  • 1
    IAM integration
  • 0
    Free Private Repositories
  • 1.8K
    Open source friendly
  • 1.5K
    Easy source control
  • 1.2K
    Nice UI
  • 1.1K
    Great for team collaboration
  • 858
    Easy setup
  • 495
    Issue tracker
  • 477
    Great community
  • 474
    Remote team collaboration
  • 443
    Great way to share
  • 435
    Pull request and features planning
  • 138
    Just works
  • 123
    Integrated in many tools
  • 111
    Free Public Repos
  • 105
    Github Gists
  • 102
    Github pages
  • 80
    Easy to find repos
  • 59
    Open source
  • 58
    Easy to find projects
  • 56
    Network effect
  • 54
    It's free
  • 46
    Extensive API
  • 42
    Organizations
  • 41
    Branching
  • 33
    Developer Profiles
  • 31
    Git Powered Wikis
  • 29
    Great for collaboration
  • 22
    Community SDK involvement
  • 22
    It's fun
  • 21
    Clean interface and good integrations
  • 18
    Learn from others source code
  • 14
    Because: Git
  • 14
    It integrates directly with Azure
  • 13
    Wide acceptance
  • 9
    Large community
  • 9
    Newsfeed
  • 9
    Standard in Open Source collab
  • 8
    It integrates directly with Hipchat
  • 7
    Fast
  • 7
    Beautiful user experience
  • 6
    Cloud SCM
  • 6
    Easy to discover new code libraries
  • 5
    Nice API
  • 5
    It's awesome
  • 5
    Integrations
  • 5
    Graphs
  • 5
    Smooth integration
  • 4
    Reliable
  • 4
    Remarkable uptime
  • 4
    Hands down best online Git service available
  • 3
    Loved by developers
  • 3
    Security options
  • 3
    Easy to use and collaborate with others
  • 3
    Simple but powerful
  • 3
    Uses GIT
  • 3
    Unlimited Public Repos at no cost
  • 3
    Version Control
  • 3
    CI Integration
  • 3
    Quick Onboarding
  • 3
    Free HTML hosting
  • 2
    Nice to use
  • 1
    Ci
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Issues tracker
  • 1
    IAM integration
  • 1
    Easy deployment via SSH
  • 1
    IAM
  • 1
    Good tools support
  • 1
    All in one development service
  • 1
    Free private repos
  • 1
    Easy source control and everything is backed up
  • 1
    Leads the copycats
  • 1
    Never dethroned
  • 1
    Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects
  • 1
    Beautiful
  • 1
    Free HTML hostings
  • 1
    Self Hosted
  • 0
    Profound
  • 0
    1

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of AWS CodeCommit
Cons of Bitbucket
Cons of GitHub
  • 10
    UI sucks
  • 3
    No Issue Tracker
  • 3
    SLOW
  • 2
    Bad diffing/no blame
  • 2
    No fork
  • 2
    No webhooks
  • 1
    NO LFS support
  • 1
    Can't download file from UI
  • 1
    Only time based triggers
  • 0
    Accident-prone UI
  • 19
    Not much community activity
  • 17
    Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui
  • 14
    Quite buggy
  • 10
    Managed by enterprise Java company
  • 8
    CI tool is not free of charge
  • 7
    Complexity with rights management
  • 6
    Only 5 collaborators for private repos
  • 4
    Slow performance
  • 2
    No AWS Codepipelines integration
  • 1
    No more Mercurial repositories
  • 1
    No server side git-hook support
  • 43
    Owned by micrcosoft
  • 36
    Expensive for lone developers that want private repos
  • 15
    Relatively slow product/feature release cadence
  • 10
    API scoping could be better
  • 8
    Only 3 collaborators for private repos
  • 3
    Limited featureset for issue management
  • 2
    GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions
  • 1
    Have to use a token for the package registry
  • 1
    No multilingual interface
  • 1
    Takes a long time to commit

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is AWS CodeCommit?

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is Bitbucket?

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

What is GitHub?

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
What companies use Bitbucket?
What companies use GitHub?

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
What tools integrate with Bitbucket?
What tools integrate with GitHub?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

Dec 8 2020 at 5:50PM
https://img.stackshare.io/company/93/8a444d2b7ec5dd7a4f3fc1819136e05178b964c8.png logo

DigitalOcean

GitHubMySQLMongoDB+11
2
1481
GitHubOptimizelySegment+3
2
925
Mar 18 2020 at 9:12AM
https://img.stackshare.io/stack/578229/default_325d30f638b437d3769e81ad2f3abee953b483f4.png logo

LaunchDarkly

GitHubLaunchDarkly+2
6
863
Mar 4 2020 at 5:14PM
https://ucarecdn.com/c2b38b34-c695-4796-871c-fa01cd485081/ logo

Atlassian

GitBitbucketWindows+4
3
492
JavaScriptGitHubReact+12
5
2995
What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, and GitHub?
GitLab
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
SVN (Subversion)
Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
See all alternatives
Interest over time
How much does AWS CodeCommit cost?
How much does Bitbucket cost?
How much does GitHub cost?
News about AWS CodeCommit
More news