Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.
I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.
SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.
As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?
Pros of GitHub
- Open source friendly1.8K
- Easy source control1.5K
- Nice UI1.2K
- Great for team collaboration1.1K
- Easy setup858
- Issue tracker495
- Great community477
- Remote team collaboration474
- Great way to share443
- Pull request and features planning435
- Just works138
- Integrated in many tools123
- Free Public Repos111
- Github Gists105
- Github pages102
- Easy to find repos80
- Open source59
- Easy to find projects58
- Network effect56
- It's free54
- Extensive API46
- Organizations42
- Branching41
- Developer Profiles33
- Git Powered Wikis31
- Great for collaboration29
- Community SDK involvement22
- It's fun22
- Clean interface and good integrations21
- Learn from others source code18
- Because: Git14
- It integrates directly with Azure14
- Wide acceptance13
- Large community9
- Newsfeed9
- Standard in Open Source collab9
- It integrates directly with Hipchat8
- Fast7
- Beautiful user experience7
- Cloud SCM6
- Easy to discover new code libraries6
- Nice API5
- It's awesome5
- Integrations5
- Graphs5
- Smooth integration5
- Reliable4
- Remarkable uptime4
- Hands down best online Git service available4
- Loved by developers3
- Security options3
- Easy to use and collaborate with others3
- Simple but powerful3
- Uses GIT3
- Unlimited Public Repos at no cost3
- Version Control3
- CI Integration3
- Quick Onboarding3
- Free HTML hosting3
- Nice to use2
- Ci1
- Easy to use1
- Issues tracker1
- IAM integration1
- Easy deployment via SSH1
- IAM1
- Good tools support1
- All in one development service1
- Free private repos1
- Easy source control and everything is backed up1
- Leads the copycats1
- Never dethroned1
- Easy and efficient maintainance of the projects1
- Beautiful1
- Free HTML hostings1
- Self Hosted1
- Profound0
- 10
Pros of GitLab
- Self hosted488
- Free416
- Has community edition331
- Easy setup234
- Familiar interface234
- Includes many features, including ci129
- Nice UI105
- Good integration with gitlabci79
- Simple setup52
- Has an official mobile app32
- Free private repository30
- Continuous Integration24
- Open source, great ui (like github)16
- Slack Integration14
- Full CI flow9
- Free and unlimited private git repos8
- User, group, and project access management is simple8
- Intuitive UI7
- All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)7
- Built-in CI6
- Both public and private Repositories4
- Mattermost Chat client3
- Integrated Docker Registry3
- It's fully integrated2
- Unlimited free repos & collaborators2
- I like the its runners and executors feature2
- CI2
- So easy to use2
- One-click install through DigitalOcean2
- It's powerful source code management tool2
- Excellent2
- Build/pipeline definition alongside code2
- Security and Stable2
- Issue system2
- Free private repos2
- Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment2
- On-premises2
- Powerful Continuous Integration System1
- Powerful software planning and maintaining tools1
- Groups of groups1
- Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI1
- Review Apps feature1
- Built-in Docker Registry1
- Dockerized1
- Beautiful1
- Wounderful1
- Opensource1
- Because is the best remote host for git repositories1
- Not Microsoft Owned1
- Full DevOps suite with Git1
- Many private repo1
- Native CI1
- HipChat intergration1
- Kubernetes Integration1
- Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)1
- Great for team collaboration1
- It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker1
- Multilingual interface1
- The dashboard with deployed environments1
- Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits0
Pros of Gitolite
- Easy setup5
- Fine-tuned per-branch permissions4
- Really easy setup1
- Free1
- Free multi-server mirroring1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GitHub
- Owned by micrcosoft43
- Expensive for lone developers that want private repos36
- Relatively slow product/feature release cadence15
- API scoping could be better10
- Only 3 collaborators for private repos8
- Limited featureset for issue management3
- GitHub Packages does not support SNAPSHOT versions2
- Have to use a token for the package registry1
- No multilingual interface1
- Takes a long time to commit1
Cons of GitLab
- Slow ui performance25
- Introduce breaking bugs every release6
- Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)5
- Review Apps feature0
- Built-in Docker Registry0
Cons of Gitolite
- Doesn't have any user interface1
- Antiquated1
- No tools for project and issue tracker1