GitHub vs GitLab vs Gogs

Overview

GitHub

Stacks296.5K

Followers259.0K

Votes10.3K

GitLab

Stacks63.6K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Gogs

Stacks174

Followers306

Votes182

GitHub vs GitLab vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction:

GitHub, GitLab, and Gogs are popular platforms for managing Git repositories, each offering unique features and benefits for developers and teams. Below are the key differences between these three platforms.

Deployment Options: GitLab and Gogs can be self-hosted, offering more control over the infrastructure and data storage, while GitHub primarily relies on its cloud-based service. This difference gives developers the flexibility to choose the deployment option that best suits their needs and security requirements.
Built-in CI/CD: GitLab stands out with its powerful built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment capabilities, offering a seamless automation pipeline within the platform. While GitHub provides integrations with third-party CI/CD tools, GitLab's ability to manage the entire workflow in one place gives it an edge in streamlining the development process.
Community and Support: GitHub has a larger user base and more extensive community support, making it a preferred choice for open-source projects and collaboration. GitLab also has a robust community but may not offer the same level of resources and support as GitHub. Gogs, on the other hand, caters more to smaller teams and individual developers with a simpler setup.
Project Management Features: GitLab includes comprehensive project management tools such as issue tracking, Kanban boards, and time tracking, integrated within the platform. GitHub offers similar features but may require additional third-party integrations for more advanced project management functionalities. Gogs, being lightweight, focuses more on the core version control aspects without extensive project management features.
Licensing Model: GitLab is an open-core platform with a mix of open-source and proprietary features, offering both free and paid tiers for users. GitHub follows a freemium model with certain features available for free and additional functionalities included in paid plans. Gogs, being open-source software, is free to use and modify, catering to developers looking for a self-hosted solution without licensing constraints.

In summary, GitHub, GitLab, and Gogs differ in deployment options, CI/CD capabilities, community support, project management features, and licensing models, catering to a wide range of developers and teams based on their specific needs and preferences.

Advice on GitHub, GitLab, Gogs

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

623k views623k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitHub	GitLab	Gogs
GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.	GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
Command instructions; Source browser; Git powered wikis; Integrated issue tracking; Code reviews with inline comments; Compare view; Newsfeed; Followers; Developer profiles; Autocompletion for @username mentions	Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 296.5K	Stacks 63.6K	Stacks 174
Followers 259.0K	Followers 54.5K	Followers 306
Votes 10.3K	Votes 2.5K	Votes 182
Pros & Cons
Pros 1773 Open source friendly 1463 Easy source control 1254 Nice UI 1137 Great for team collaboration 868 Easy setup Cons 56 Owned by micrcosoft 38 Expensive for lone developers that want private repos 15 Relatively slow product/feature release cadence 10 API scoping could be better 9 Only 3 collaborators for private repos	Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 36 Self-hosted github like service 31 Very low memory footprint 29 Easy to install / update 17 Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi 16 Single binary deploy no dependencies
Integrations
Grove Lighthouse Airbrake Codeship Bugsnag BugHerd Visual Studio Code HipChat CopperEgg Nitrous.IO	No integrations available	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to GitHub, GitLab, Gogs?

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

GitHub Enterprise

GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.

Related Comparisons

GitHub vs GitLab vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Deployment Options: GitLab and Gogs can be self-hosted, offering more control over the infrastructure and data storage, while GitHub primarily relies on its cloud-based service. This difference gives developers the flexibility to choose the deployment option that best suits their needs and security requirements.
Built-in CI/CD: GitLab stands out with its powerful built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment capabilities, offering a seamless automation pipeline within the platform. While GitHub provides integrations with third-party CI/CD tools, GitLab's ability to manage the entire workflow in one place gives it an edge in streamlining the development process.
Community and Support: GitHub has a larger user base and more extensive community support, making it a preferred choice for open-source projects and collaboration. GitLab also has a robust community but may not offer the same level of resources and support as GitHub. Gogs, on the other hand, caters more to smaller teams and individual developers with a simpler setup.
Project Management Features: GitLab includes comprehensive project management tools such as issue tracking, Kanban boards, and time tracking, integrated within the platform. GitHub offers similar features but may require additional third-party integrations for more advanced project management functionalities. Gogs, being lightweight, focuses more on the core version control aspects without extensive project management features.
Licensing Model: GitLab is an open-core platform with a mix of open-source and proprietary features, offering both free and paid tiers for users. GitHub follows a freemium model with certain features available for free and additional functionalities included in paid plans. Gogs, being open-source software, is free to use and modify, catering to developers looking for a self-hosted solution without licensing constraints.

GitHub vs GitLab vs Gogs

Overview

GitHub vs GitLab vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Advice on GitHub, GitLab, Gogs

Detailed Comparison