AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit
AWS CodeCommit



- No public GitHub repository available -
- No public GitHub repository available -

What is AWS CodeCommit?

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

What is GitHub?

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

What is GitLab?

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose AWS CodeCommit?
Why do developers choose GitHub?
Why do developers choose GitLab?
What are the cons of using AWS CodeCommit?
What are the cons of using GitHub?
What are the cons of using GitLab?
What companies use AWS CodeCommit?
What companies use GitHub?
What companies use GitLab?
What are some alternatives to AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and GitLab?
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
GitHub Enterprise
GitHub Enterprise lets developers use the tools they love across the development process with support for popular IDEs, continuous integration tools, and hundreds of third party apps and services.
The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.
JFrog Artifactory
It integrates with your existing ecosystem supporting end-to-end binary management that overcomes the complexity of working with different software package management systems, and provides consistency to your CI/CD workflow.
See all alternatives
What tools integrate with AWS CodeCommit?
What tools integrate with GitHub?
What tools integrate with GitLab?
    No integrations found
    Decisions about AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and GitLab
    Logan Campos
    Logan Campos
    Computer Programmer at · | 10 upvotes · 38.4K views

    As an former administrator for GitLab enterprise I can say for closed source development it is an amazing tool to have. It does however have limits. For starters you will need to bother your unix administrators to assign a license to you. And after that happens the same guys start getting cranky if you use git LFS(Large File Storage) or manage a couple repos about ~100MBish. if you fork open source efforts remember to git clone --depth 1 ! As a free user of GitHub , I don't get crazy CI pipelines or crazy project management tools. I also don't need it !

    See more
    Russtopia Labs
    Russtopia Labs
    Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs · | 3 upvotes · 19.7K views

    I installed Gogs after a few repos I planned to use on GitHub disappeared without explanation, and after Microsoft's acquisition of same, it made me think about the over-centralization of community-developed software. A self-hosted solution that enables easy point-and-click mirroring of important repositories for my projects, both in-house and 3rd-party, ensures I won't be bitten by upstream catastrophes. (So far, Microsoft's stewardship has been fine, but always be prepared). It's also a very nice way to host one's own private repos before they're ready for prime-time on github.

    Gogs is written in Go and is easy to install and configure, much more so than GitLab. The only major feature I wish it had is an integrated code review tool.

    See more
    Daniel Quinn
    Daniel Quinn
    Senior Developer at Founders4Schools · | 6 upvotes · 7.2K views
    atThe Paperless ProjectThe Paperless Project

    We use GitHub because it's the default go-to place for the Free software community. Currently, Github is enjoying the network effect: you write code there because everyone writes there code there, so this choice was less of a choice than "what we all end up doing".

    Personally, I prefer GitLab for its bundled-in tools like CI, boards, packaging, and Docker repo, but so long as the vast majority of talented nerds out there are on Github, that's where Paperless will be.

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and GitLab
    Avatar of veggiemonk
    JavaScript Developer
    Review ofGitLabGitLab

    You cannot get easier setup and deployment with GitLab. The documentation is huge and many common use cases are covered. It has a Community Edition (CE, free, 100% open source) and an Enterprise Edittion (EE, see pricing). The CE is more than good enough. Although in the entreprise world, the EE is much better suited if, for instance, LDAP is needed. There is a Web UI that allows people to version their work without too much hassle. If you are a developer and have worked with git before this is really easy.

    Avatar of sivakumar-kailasam
    Staff Software Engineer
    Review ofGitHubGitHub

    For starters you can fork a repo, edit it online and send a pull request which is huge if its something very small that you want to commit. The whole pull request system, the UI and the UX are great. If I sent out a pull request that failed on travis CI then all I need to do is fix it in my fork and the original pull request will have these updates as well making it super easy for everyone involved. Overall a great service.

    Avatar of AnakinPt
    Lead Engineer at Fineos
    Review ofAWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

    The pull requests are only merged by FF what makes all the merges hard to manage. The IAM configuration is very awkward and the unavailability to add git hooks to prevent commits to be made into the server makes this tool not much usable for a software development company.

    Review ofGitHubGitHub

    I love GitHub! They provide a completely free service for hosting, storing, and collaborating on code. Seriously, if you aren't using them, go sign up now.

    Review ofGitHubGitHub

    Great collaboration-friendly git repository hosting. Plus integration with all sorts of other stuff, like Travis CI. But the command bar has disappeared...

    Avatar of princesust
    Review ofGitHubGitHub

    It's the best tools I have ever used.

    How developers use AWS CodeCommit, GitHub, and GitLab
    Avatar of Airbnb
    Airbnb uses GitHubGitHub

    "Having a CI server building all commits across all branches was a huge first step, but to make this useful we needed to surface the outcome of these builds. This is where GitHub’s commit status API comes in. Every time our CI server begins a build, it pings GitHub’s commit status endpoint, and every time it completes a build it hits the endpoint again with the outcome. Now every open PR includes a yellow/red/green indicator for the branch in question, with a direct link to the build status page on our CI server. In practice this means more transparency, faster feedback cycles, and a guarantee that every branch merged into master has a passing test suite. This integration has been a huge help in keeping our master branch green, and has thus greatly reduced our deploy times (since engineers aren’t waiting on build failures to be resolved in master)."

    Avatar of Matt Welke
    Matt Welke uses GitHubGitHub

    Pervasive, easy to use Git repo hosting. I host ongoing personal projects privately and my personal blog (via GitHub Pages).

    I also take successful proofs of concept (for example, experimenting with linking AWS Lambda to Heroku Postgres to create a serverless SQL backed web app), and host them as public example repos. These are linked to Dependabot and CircleCI if they have tests so that dependencies can be kept up to date automatically over time and the code using the dependencies can stay fresh over time for example viewers.

    Avatar of yaswanthgoud3235
    yaswanthgoud3235 uses GitHubGitHub

    GitHub is a Web-based Git version control repository hosting service. It is mostly used for computer code. It offers all of the distributed version control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. It provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project

    Avatar of Instacart
    Instacart uses GitHubGitHub

    Yeah, so we use GitHub, and we basically use a variant of continuous deployment where when anyone merges in a feature that they’ve finished with, they ship it immediately, and we bundle it up as a build pack and send it to all of our EC2 servers... Any developer on the team can trigger a build and deploy at any time. So on a given day, we probably deploy 20 or 30 times to prod.

    Avatar of StackShare
    StackShare uses GitHubGitHub

    One thing I really wish GitHub had: Trello-style kanban for Issues. There are a bunch of services and tools that add Kanban to GitHub Issues. But Trello just seems far better. If GitHub had it’s own kanban tool, I’d probably use it. Right now it’s pretty painful to try to tie cards to commits manually (when/if we remember to).

    Avatar of Eldoria
    Eldoria uses GitLabGitLab

    Als einer der größten Konkurrenten zu GitHub und BitBucket, stellt GitLab eine verlässliche Alternative dar. Als private GitLab Instanz oder als Service bietet GitLab alle Features die wir benötigen und das völlig Kostenfrei in der Community Edition. Hier liegen alle unsere Repositories.

    Avatar of Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
    Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) uses GitLabGitLab

    Gitlab offers us a self-hosted replacement for Github and even more than we were expecting from it. All of our code is hosted in our private GitLab-instance, that also hosts our artifacts and is used to deploy them into production.

    Avatar of HyVive
    HyVive uses GitLabGitLab

    Our self hosted gitlab service provides us with a private and secure environment for developing and testing our internal software. All of our dockerfiles, source code and configuration files for our infrastructure are stored here.

    Avatar of Refractal
    Refractal uses GitLabGitLab

    GitLab is our main Git server, housed on a separate box inside our VPN, it's diverse features and sandbox-support allows it to be an extremely good way to secure your source code.

    Avatar of Volkan Özçelik
    Volkan Özçelik uses AWS CodeCommitAWS CodeCommit

    I use CodeCommit for projects that require a tighter integration with the AWS ecosystem.

    Otherwise, my default source control system as a service of choice is: GitHub.

    Avatar of yaswanthgoud3235
    yaswanthgoud3235 uses GitLabGitLab

    GitLab is a web-based Git repository manager with wiki and issue tracking features, using an open source license, developed by GitLab Inc. The software

    How much does AWS CodeCommit cost?
    How much does GitHub cost?
    How much does GitLab cost?
    News about AWS CodeCommit
    More news