AWS WAF vs Cloudflare WAF

Overview

AWS WAF

Stacks164

Followers191

Votes0

Cloudflare WAF

Stacks33

Followers53

Votes0

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare WAF: What are the differences?

Deployment Models: AWS WAF is typically deployed in front of a specific application hosted on AWS, providing targeted protection. On the other hand, Cloudflare WAF is commonly deployed as a centralized service in front of multiple applications and platforms, offering broader coverage.
Scalability: AWS WAF can be scaled vertically within AWS resources to handle increased traffic and demand. In contrast, Cloudflare WAF offers horizontal scalability through its global network, allowing it to efficiently handle high volumes of traffic across geographically dispersed locations.
Performance: AWS WAF operates within the AWS ecosystem, which can provide lower latency for traffic managed within AWS. Cloudflare WAF leverages its global network to optimize performance, allowing for faster response times and reduced latency in serving traffic from various regions.
Cost Structure: AWS WAF typically involves pay-as-you-go pricing based on the volume of traffic and rules configured, potentially leading to variable costs. Cloudflare WAF offers more straightforward pricing models, including flat-rate plans with predictable costs regardless of traffic volume or rules.
Integration Capabilities: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Amazon CloudFront and Elastic Load Balancing, enhancing its compatibility within the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Cloudflare WAF offers robust integration with various third-party platforms and services, providing flexibility in deployment across different environments.
Global Presence: Cloudflare WAF has a vast network of data centers worldwide, enabling it to provide distributed protection and DDoS mitigation on a global scale. While AWS WAF can also offer global coverage through AWS resources, Cloudflare's extensive network presence can offer additional advantages in terms of performance and security.

In Summary, AWS WAF and Cloudflare WAF differ in deployment models, scalability, performance, cost structure, integration capabilities, and global presence, providing users with options based on their specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS WAF	Cloudflare WAF
AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.	An intelligent, integrated and scalable solution to protect your business-critical web applications from malicious attacks, with no changes to your existing infrastructure.
-	Intuitive dashboard; Terraform integration; Threat intelligence
Statistics
Stacks 164	Stacks 33
Followers 191	Followers 53
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Terraform

What are some alternatives to AWS WAF, Cloudflare WAF?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare WAF: What are the differences?

Deployment Models: AWS WAF is typically deployed in front of a specific application hosted on AWS, providing targeted protection. On the other hand, Cloudflare WAF is commonly deployed as a centralized service in front of multiple applications and platforms, offering broader coverage.
Scalability: AWS WAF can be scaled vertically within AWS resources to handle increased traffic and demand. In contrast, Cloudflare WAF offers horizontal scalability through its global network, allowing it to efficiently handle high volumes of traffic across geographically dispersed locations.
Performance: AWS WAF operates within the AWS ecosystem, which can provide lower latency for traffic managed within AWS. Cloudflare WAF leverages its global network to optimize performance, allowing for faster response times and reduced latency in serving traffic from various regions.
Cost Structure: AWS WAF typically involves pay-as-you-go pricing based on the volume of traffic and rules configured, potentially leading to variable costs. Cloudflare WAF offers more straightforward pricing models, including flat-rate plans with predictable costs regardless of traffic volume or rules.
Integration Capabilities: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with other AWS services like Amazon CloudFront and Elastic Load Balancing, enhancing its compatibility within the AWS ecosystem. In contrast, Cloudflare WAF offers robust integration with various third-party platforms and services, providing flexibility in deployment across different environments.
Global Presence: Cloudflare WAF has a vast network of data centers worldwide, enabling it to provide distributed protection and DDoS mitigation on a global scale. While AWS WAF can also offer global coverage through AWS resources, Cloudflare's extensive network presence can offer additional advantages in terms of performance and security.

AWS WAF vs Cloudflare WAF

Overview