StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Security
  4. Security
  5. AWS WAF vs Google reCaptcha

AWS WAF vs Google reCaptcha

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Stacks164
Followers191
Votes0
Google reCaptcha
Google reCaptcha
Stacks281
Followers78
Votes0

AWS WAF vs Google reCaptcha: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will be examining the key differences between AWS WAF and Google reCaptcha. Both AWS WAF and Google reCaptcha are important tools in the field of web security, but they differ in several aspects. Below are the key differences between these two services.

  1. Pricing Model: AWS WAF follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model where you are charged based on the number of web requests and rules used. On the other hand, Google reCaptcha is mostly free for individual websites. However, if higher usage limits and enterprise features are required, there are paid options available.

  2. Deployment Approach: AWS WAF is deployed as a web application firewall directly on AWS infrastructure, allowing you to protect your applications and APIs hosted on Amazon Web Services. Google reCaptcha, on the other hand, is a service that can be easily integrated into any website or application regardless of the hosting provider.

  3. Security Capabilities: AWS WAF focuses on protecting web applications from common web exploits and cyberattacks, such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting (XSS), and application-layer DDoS attacks. It provides advanced security features like IP blocking, rate limiting, and rule-based filtering. Google reCaptcha, on the other hand, is primarily designed to distinguish between human and automated bots, offering protection against spam and abusive traffic.

  4. Flexibility and Customization: AWS WAF offers a high level of flexibility and customization options, allowing you to create and manage complex rules to fit your specific security requirements. It provides a wide range of rule conditions and actions that can be tailored according to your application's needs. In contrast, Google reCaptcha provides a more standardized approach with pre-defined challenges and interactions, limiting the customization options for the user.

  5. Integration and Compatibility: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, such as Amazon CloudFront (CDN) and AWS Application Load Balancer, providing easy scalability and management. It is also compatible with various AWS security tools, like AWS Firewall Manager for centralized management. Google reCaptcha, on the other hand, can be integrated into any website or application, regardless of the technology stack or hosting provider being used.

  6. User Experience: When it comes to user experience, Google reCaptcha offers a more seamless and user-friendly integration with its "invisible reCaptcha" option, where users do not need to actively solve challenges or click checkboxes. This provides a smoother experience for genuine users, reducing friction and improving conversion rates. AWS WAF, while effective in protecting against malicious traffic, may introduce some additional steps or challenges during the user authentication process, resulting in a potentially less seamless experience.

In summary, AWS WAF and Google reCaptcha differ in their pricing models, deployment approaches, security capabilities, flexibility, integration options, and user experience. Choosing between these two services depends on your specific security requirements, budget, target audience, and desired level of customization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Google reCaptcha
Google reCaptcha

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.

It is a free service that protects your website from spam and abuse. It uses an advanced risk analysis engine and adaptive CAPTCHAs to keep automated software from engaging in abusive activities on your site. It does this while letting your valid users pass through with ease.

-
Powered by machine learning;Protects your website from spam and abuse;Uses advanced risk analysis engine
Statistics
Stacks
164
Stacks
281
Followers
191
Followers
78
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java
HTML5
HTML5
Kotlin
Kotlin

What are some alternatives to AWS WAF, Google reCaptcha?

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Tirreno

Tirreno

Open security analytics. Understand, monitor, and protect your product from cyber threats, account takeovers, fake accounts, and abuse.

Virgil Security

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope