AWS WAF vs IBM QRadar

Overview

AWS WAF

Stacks164

Followers191

Votes0

IBM QRadar

Stacks19

Followers44

Votes0

AWS WAF vs IBM QRadar: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this document, we will compare AWS WAF and IBM QRadar and highlight the key differences between the two.

Scalability: AWS WAF is highly scalable and can handle various levels of traffic efficiently. It is designed to handle high-volume applications and automatically scales to match the demand. On the other hand, IBM QRadar is primarily a security information and event management (SIEM) system and may not be as scalable as AWS WAF when it comes to handling large volumes of traffic.
Managed Rules: AWS WAF provides managed rule sets that are regularly updated and maintained by AWS. These rule sets help protect against common web attacks, making it easier for users to ensure their application's security. In contrast, IBM QRadar does not offer pre-configured managed rules; users need to create and configure their own rules manually.
Visibility and Monitoring: AWS WAF integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, such as CloudWatch and AWS Firewall Manager, providing users with comprehensive visibility and monitoring of their web applications. Users can easily view and analyze logs, metrics, and other performance data. On the other hand, IBM QRadar provides extensive visibility, event correlation, and monitoring capabilities for various types of security events, not limited to web security.
Deployment Options: AWS WAF can be easily deployed either on AWS CloudFront or directly on Application Load Balancers (ALBs) and Amazon API Gateway. This makes it a suitable choice for users who primarily use AWS services. On the other hand, IBM QRadar is a standalone SIEM solution that can be deployed on-premises or in a private cloud, offering more flexibility for users who have specific requirements for their deployment environment.
Integration with other Security Tools: AWS WAF can integrate with various other AWS security services, such as AWS Shield, AWS Security Hub, and Amazon CloudFront, providing a comprehensive security solution for web applications. IBM QRadar, being a SIEM solution, offers integrations with a wide range of security tools, including threat intelligence feeds, vulnerability scanners, and security orchestration tools.
Pricing Model: AWS WAF follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users pay for the number of rules they use and the amount of traffic processed. This allows users to have more control over their costs. On the other hand, IBM QRadar typically follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay an upfront cost for licensing and ongoing maintenance.

In summary, AWS WAF and IBM QRadar differ in terms of scalability, managed rules, visibility and monitoring capabilities, deployment options, integration with other security tools, and pricing models.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS WAF	IBM QRadar
AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.	It is an enterprise security information and event management (SIEM) product. It includes out-of-the-box analytics, correlation rules and dashboards to help customers address their most pressing security use cases — without requiring significant customization effort.
-	Gain comprehensive visibility into enterprise data across on-premises and cloud-based environments from behind a single pane of glass; Detect known and unknown threats, go beyond individual alerts to identify and prioritize potential incidents, and apply AI to accelerate investigation processes by 50 percent; Gain closed-loop feedback to continuously improve detection, and use the time savings from automated security intelligence to proactively hunt threats and automate containment processes
Statistics
Stacks 164	Stacks 19
Followers 191	Followers 44
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to AWS WAF, IBM QRadar?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

AWS Key Management Service

AWS Key Management Service (KMS) is a managed service that makes it easy for you to create and control the encryption keys used to encrypt your data, and uses Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) to protect the security of your keys. AWS Key Management Service is integrated with other AWS services including Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, and Amazon Redshift. AWS Key Management Service is also integrated with AWS CloudTrail to provide you with logs of all key usage to help meet your regulatory and compliance needs.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

Related Comparisons

AWS WAF vs IBM QRadar: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this document, we will compare AWS WAF and IBM QRadar and highlight the key differences between the two.

Scalability: AWS WAF is highly scalable and can handle various levels of traffic efficiently. It is designed to handle high-volume applications and automatically scales to match the demand. On the other hand, IBM QRadar is primarily a security information and event management (SIEM) system and may not be as scalable as AWS WAF when it comes to handling large volumes of traffic.
Managed Rules: AWS WAF provides managed rule sets that are regularly updated and maintained by AWS. These rule sets help protect against common web attacks, making it easier for users to ensure their application's security. In contrast, IBM QRadar does not offer pre-configured managed rules; users need to create and configure their own rules manually.
Visibility and Monitoring: AWS WAF integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, such as CloudWatch and AWS Firewall Manager, providing users with comprehensive visibility and monitoring of their web applications. Users can easily view and analyze logs, metrics, and other performance data. On the other hand, IBM QRadar provides extensive visibility, event correlation, and monitoring capabilities for various types of security events, not limited to web security.
Deployment Options: AWS WAF can be easily deployed either on AWS CloudFront or directly on Application Load Balancers (ALBs) and Amazon API Gateway. This makes it a suitable choice for users who primarily use AWS services. On the other hand, IBM QRadar is a standalone SIEM solution that can be deployed on-premises or in a private cloud, offering more flexibility for users who have specific requirements for their deployment environment.
Integration with other Security Tools: AWS WAF can integrate with various other AWS security services, such as AWS Shield, AWS Security Hub, and Amazon CloudFront, providing a comprehensive security solution for web applications. IBM QRadar, being a SIEM solution, offers integrations with a wide range of security tools, including threat intelligence feeds, vulnerability scanners, and security orchestration tools.
Pricing Model: AWS WAF follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users pay for the number of rules they use and the amount of traffic processed. This allows users to have more control over their costs. On the other hand, IBM QRadar typically follows a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay an upfront cost for licensing and ongoing maintenance.

AWS WAF vs IBM QRadar

Overview