AWS WAF vs pfSense

Overview

AWS WAF

Stacks164

Followers191

Votes0

pfSense

Stacks109

Followers95

Votes0

AWS WAF vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Introduction:

AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) and pfSense are both security solutions used to protect web applications and networks. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two.

Deployment: AWS WAF is a managed firewall service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that operates in the cloud. It is a scalable solution and is integrated with other AWS services. On the other hand, pfSense is an open-source firewall and router software that can be deployed on physical hardware or virtual machines.
Cost: AWS WAF is a subscription-based service, where users pay for the resources they consume on AWS, including the WAF service. The cost varies based on the chosen configuration and the amount of traffic processed. In contrast, pfSense is open-source and free to use, although users may incur costs to deploy it on dedicated hardware or virtual machines.
Ease of Use: AWS WAF offers a user-friendly interface and simplified setup process. It integrates with other AWS services, making it easier to configure and manage security rules. PfSense, while powerful, may require more technical expertise for initial setup and configuration.
Scalability: AWS WAF is designed to handle high volumes of web traffic and can scale automatically based on demand. It can handle millions of requests per second. PfSense, on the other hand, may have scalability limitations depending on the hardware or virtual machine it is deployed on.
Managed Service vs Self-Managed: AWS WAF is a managed service provided by AWS, which means that Amazon takes care of the infrastructure, maintenance, and updates. Users can focus on configuring the security rules and policies. PfSense, being an open-source software solution, requires users to handle their own infrastructure, updates, and maintenance.
Integration with external services: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon CloudFront, Elastic Load Balancing, and AWS Shield. This allows for a comprehensive security solution. PfSense, being a standalone software solution, may require additional setup and configuration to integrate with other services.

In summary, AWS WAF and pfSense differ in terms of deployment, cost, ease of use, scalability, managed service vs self-managed, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS WAF	pfSense
AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.	It is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. It is installed on a physical computer or a virtual machine to make a dedicated firewall/router for a network.
-	Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI); GeoIP blocking
Statistics
Stacks 164	Stacks 109
Followers 191	Followers 95
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Squid OpenVPN OpenLDAP

What are some alternatives to AWS WAF, pfSense?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

AWS WAF vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Deployment: AWS WAF is a managed firewall service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that operates in the cloud. It is a scalable solution and is integrated with other AWS services. On the other hand, pfSense is an open-source firewall and router software that can be deployed on physical hardware or virtual machines.
Cost: AWS WAF is a subscription-based service, where users pay for the resources they consume on AWS, including the WAF service. The cost varies based on the chosen configuration and the amount of traffic processed. In contrast, pfSense is open-source and free to use, although users may incur costs to deploy it on dedicated hardware or virtual machines.
Ease of Use: AWS WAF offers a user-friendly interface and simplified setup process. It integrates with other AWS services, making it easier to configure and manage security rules. PfSense, while powerful, may require more technical expertise for initial setup and configuration.
Scalability: AWS WAF is designed to handle high volumes of web traffic and can scale automatically based on demand. It can handle millions of requests per second. PfSense, on the other hand, may have scalability limitations depending on the hardware or virtual machine it is deployed on.
Managed Service vs Self-Managed: AWS WAF is a managed service provided by AWS, which means that Amazon takes care of the infrastructure, maintenance, and updates. Users can focus on configuring the security rules and policies. PfSense, being an open-source software solution, requires users to handle their own infrastructure, updates, and maintenance.
Integration with external services: AWS WAF seamlessly integrates with other AWS services such as Amazon CloudFront, Elastic Load Balancing, and AWS Shield. This allows for a comprehensive security solution. PfSense, being a standalone software solution, may require additional setup and configuration to integrate with other services.

In summary, AWS WAF and pfSense differ in terms of deployment, cost, ease of use, scalability, managed service vs self-managed, and integration capabilities.

AWS WAF vs pfSense

Overview