Axon vs JHipster

Overview

JHipster

Stacks200

Followers327

Votes0

GitHub Stars22.2K

Forks4.1K

Axon

Stacks67

Followers89

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.5K

Forks822

Axon vs JHipster: What are the differences?

1. **Architecture**: Axon follows a CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) architecture, separating the write model (commands) from the read model (queries), while JHipster is a monolithic application generator that follows traditional MVC architecture. 2. **Event Sourcing**: Axon supports event sourcing out-of-the-box, storing all changes to application state as a sequence of events, allowing for easy tracking and auditing of data modifications, while JHipster does not inherently support event sourcing. 3. **Scalability**: Axon is designed for scalable and distributed systems, providing mechanisms for interacting with components asynchronously and handling high loads more efficiently, while JHipster might require additional configurations for achieving high scalability. 4. **Community Support**: JHipster has a large and active community, offering a wide range of plugins, modules, and integrations for rapid development, whereas Axon's community, although growing, might have comparatively limited resources and support. 5. **Domain-Driven Design (DDD) Emphasis**: Axon places a strong emphasis on Domain-Driven Design principles, making it easier to model complex business domains and ensuring a better alignment between the codebase and the business requirements, which might not be as pronounced in JHipster. 6. **Purpose**: Axon Framework is specifically designed for building applications based on CQRS and event sourcing patterns, providing comprehensive support for such architectures, while JHipster is a more general-purpose application generator suited for a variety of project types.

In Summary, Axon and JHipster differ in architecture, event sourcing support, scalability, community backing, emphasis on DDD, and overall purpose.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

JHipster	Axon
It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.	Based on architectural principles, such as DDD and CQRS, Axon Framework provides the building blocks to create scalable and extensible applications while maintaining consistency in distributed systems.
-	Scalability and Performance; Auditability and Transparency; Business Agility; Application and Business Insights
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.2K	GitHub Stars 3.5K
GitHub Forks 4.1K	GitHub Forks 822
Stacks 200	Stacks 67
Followers 327	Followers 89
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	MongoDB Kafka Spring Boot Java Spring Framework gRPC Kotlin Spring Cloud Project Reactor

What are some alternatives to JHipster, Axon?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Axon vs JHipster: What are the differences?

In Summary, Axon and JHipster differ in architecture, event sourcing support, scalability, community backing, emphasis on DDD, and overall purpose.

Axon vs JHipster

Overview