StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Azure Data Factory vs OpenRefine

Azure Data Factory vs OpenRefine

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory
Stacks253
Followers484
Votes0
GitHub Stars516
Forks610
OpenRefine
OpenRefine
Stacks33
Followers68
Votes0
GitHub Stars11.6K
Forks2.1K

Azure Data Factory vs OpenRefine: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Azure Data Factory and OpenRefine are both data integration tools that aim to help in processing and managing large volumes of data. However, they have key differences that set them apart in terms of features and functionalities. This article will summarize the key differences between Azure Data Factory and OpenRefine in six distinct points.

1. Data Sources and Integration Capabilities: Azure Data Factory is a fully managed cloud-based service that provides a wide range of connectors to various data sources, including on-premises databases, cloud storage, and SaaS applications. It offers seamless integration with Azure services, enabling users to ingest, transform, and load data easily. On the other hand, OpenRefine is primarily designed for data cleaning and transformation tasks and supports various file formats such as CSV, Excel, and JSON. While it offers some data source connectivity, its integration capabilities are more limited compared to Azure Data Factory.

2. Data Transformation and Data Flow Orchestration: Azure Data Factory offers a visual interface for designing and orchestrating data transformation pipelines or workflows. It provides a rich set of data transformation activities, such as mapping, filtering, and aggregating, which can be performed using built-in functions or custom code. OpenRefine, on the other hand, focuses more on data cleaning and manipulation. It provides advanced data transformation capabilities using various functions and operations directly applied to the dataset.

3. Scalability and Performance: Azure Data Factory has built-in scalability and high-performance capabilities to handle large-scale data processing. It can scale horizontally to handle big data workloads efficiently. It leverages Azure resources and services for distributed computing, ensuring high throughput and low latency. OpenRefine, on the other hand, is more suitable for smaller datasets and is limited in terms of scalability and performance. It operates on a single machine, which may cause performance issues when processing large volumes of data.

4. Data Governance and Security: Azure Data Factory offers robust security features and compliance certifications, ensuring data protection and regulatory compliance. It provides encryption, authentication, and authorization mechanisms to secure data in transit and at rest. It also integrates with Azure Active Directory for user access management. OpenRefine, being a desktop application, does not provide the same level of data governance and security features as Azure Data Factory. Security measures need to be implemented separately when working with OpenRefine.

5. Collaboration and Teamwork: Azure Data Factory supports collaboration and teamwork by providing integration with Azure DevOps and other collaboration tools. It allows multiple users to work on the same data integration projects concurrently and provides version control and deployment capabilities. OpenRefine, on the other hand, is primarily designed for individual use and lacks built-in collaboration features. Users can export projects and share them with others, but true collaborative functionalities are limited.

6. Pricing and Cost Model: Azure Data Factory follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the number of data integration activities executed and the data processed. It offers different pricing tiers with various features and performance levels. OpenRefine, on the other hand, is an open-source tool and is free to use without any upfront costs. However, users need to consider the hardware and infrastructure costs associated with running OpenRefine on their own hardware.

In summary, Azure Data Factory and OpenRefine have key differences in terms of data sources and integration capabilities, data transformation and data flow orchestration, scalability and performance, data governance and security, collaboration and teamwork, and pricing and cost model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Azure Data Factory, OpenRefine

Vamshi
Vamshi

Data Engineer at Tata Consultancy Services

May 29, 2020

Needs adviceonPySparkPySparkAzure Data FactoryAzure Data FactoryDatabricksDatabricks

I have to collect different data from multiple sources and store them in a single cloud location. Then perform cleaning and transforming using PySpark, and push the end results to other applications like reporting tools, etc. What would be the best solution? I can only think of Azure Data Factory + Databricks. Are there any alternatives to #AWS services + Databricks?

269k views269k
Comments
Sarah
Sarah

Jun 25, 2020

Needs adviceonOpenRefineOpenRefine

I'm looking for an open-source/free/cheap tool to clean messy data coming from various travel APIs. We use many different APIs and save the info in our DB. However, many duplicates cannot be easily recognized as such.

We would either write an algorithm or use smart technology/tools with ML to help with product management.

While there are many things to be considered, this is one feature that it should have:

"To avoid confusion, we need to merge the suppliers & products accordingly. Products and suppliers must be able to be merged and assigned separately.

Reason: It may happen that one supplier offers different products. E.g., 1 tour operator offers 3 products via 1 API, but only 1 product with 3 (or a different amount of) variations via a different API. Also, the commission may differ for products, which we need to consider. Very often, products that are live (are bookable in real-time) on via 1 API, but are not live on the other. E.g., Supplier product 1 & 2 of API1 are live, product 3 not. For the same supplier, API2 provides live availability for products 1, 2, and 3.

Summing up, when merging the suppliers (tour operators) we need to consider:

  • Are the products the same for all APIs?
  • Which booking system API gives a better commission? Note: Some APIs charge us 1-5% depending on the monthly sale, which needs to be considered
  • Which booking system provides live availability
  • Is it the same supplier, or is the name only similar?

Most of the time, the supplier names differ even if they are the same (e.g., API1 often names them XX Pty Ltd, while API2 leaves "Pty Ltd" out). Additionally, the product title, description, etc. differ.

We need to write logic and create an algorithm to find the duplicates & to merge, assign, or (de)activate the respective supplier or product. My previous developer started a module to merge the suppliers, which does not seem to work correctly. Also, it is way too time taking considering the high amount of products that we have.

I would recommend merging, assigning etc. products and suppliers only if our algorithm says it's 90- 100% the matching supplier/product. Otherwise, admins need to be able to check & modify this. E.g. everything with a lower possibility of matching will be matched automatically, but can be undone or modified.

The next time the cron job runs, this needs to be considered to avoid recreating duplicates & creating a mess."

I am not sure in what way OpenRefine can help to achieve this and what ML tool can be connected to learn from the decisions the product management team makes. Maybe you have an idea of how other travel portals deal with messy data, duplicates, etc.?

I'm looking for the cheapest solution for a start-up, but it should do the work properly.

19.2k views19.2k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory
OpenRefine
OpenRefine

It is a service designed to allow developers to integrate disparate data sources. It is a platform somewhat like SSIS in the cloud to manage the data you have both on-prem and in the cloud.

It is a powerful tool for working with messy data: cleaning it; transforming it from one format into another; and extending it with web services and external data.

Real-Time Integration; Parallel Processing; Data Chunker; Data Masking; Proactive Monitoring; Big Data Processing
Faceting; Clustering; Editing cells; Reconciling; Extending web services
Statistics
GitHub Stars
516
GitHub Stars
11.6K
GitHub Forks
610
GitHub Forks
2.1K
Stacks
253
Stacks
33
Followers
484
Followers
68
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Octotree
Octotree
Java
Java
.NET
.NET
Python
Python
Dask
Dask
Ludwig
Ludwig
Vertica
Vertica

What are some alternatives to Azure Data Factory, OpenRefine?

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena

Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that makes it easy to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Athena is serverless, so there is no infrastructure to manage, and you pay only for the queries that you run.

Apache Flink

Apache Flink

Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.

lakeFS

lakeFS

It is an open-source data version control system for data lakes. It provides a “Git for data” platform enabling you to implement best practices from software engineering on your data lake, including branching and merging, CI/CD, and production-like dev/test environments.

Druid

Druid

Druid is a distributed, column-oriented, real-time analytics data store that is commonly used to power exploratory dashboards in multi-tenant environments. Druid excels as a data warehousing solution for fast aggregate queries on petabyte sized data sets. Druid supports a variety of flexible filters, exact calculations, approximate algorithms, and other useful calculations.

Apache Kylin

Apache Kylin

Apache Kylin™ is an open source Distributed Analytics Engine designed to provide SQL interface and multi-dimensional analysis (OLAP) on Hadoop/Spark supporting extremely large datasets, originally contributed from eBay Inc.

Apache Camel

Apache Camel

An open source Java framework that focuses on making integration easier and more accessible to developers.

Splunk

Splunk

It provides the leading platform for Operational Intelligence. Customers use it to search, monitor, analyze and visualize machine data.

Apache Impala

Apache Impala

Impala is a modern, open source, MPP SQL query engine for Apache Hadoop. Impala is shipped by Cloudera, MapR, and Amazon. With Impala, you can query data, whether stored in HDFS or Apache HBase – including SELECT, JOIN, and aggregate functions – in real time.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase