StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. Microservices Tools
  5. Azure Service Fabric vs Zuul

Azure Service Fabric vs Zuul

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zuul
Zuul
Stacks392
Followers385
Votes8
Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric
Stacks103
Followers284
Votes26
GitHub Stars3.0K
Forks399

Azure Service Fabric vs Zuul: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will compare Azure Service Fabric and Zuul and highlight their key differences in terms of features and capabilities.

  1. Scalability: Azure Service Fabric is a distributed system platform that enables building scalable and reliable applications. It provides automatic scaling, allowing applications to dynamically adjust resources based on demand. On the other hand, Zuul acts as a gateway service for routing requests to multiple microservices. While Zuul can handle scaling by deploying multiple instances, it does not provide automatic scaling like Azure Service Fabric.

  2. Service Discovery and Load Balancing: Azure Service Fabric includes built-in service discovery and load balancing mechanisms. It uses a hierarchical naming model to enable service discovery and automatically distributes incoming requests across instances of the services. Zuul, however, relies on a service registry like Netflix Eureka for service discovery and uses client-side load balancing to distribute requests.

  3. Application Packaging and Deployment: Azure Service Fabric provides a comprehensive application packaging and deployment model. It supports multiple application models such as containers, guest executables, and Service Fabric services. Developers can package their applications as a single unit and deploy them to the cluster. Zuul, being a gateway service, does not focus on application packaging and deployment as it primarily acts as a routing layer for microservices.

  4. Fault Tolerance and Resilience: Azure Service Fabric offers built-in fault tolerance and resilience features such as stateful services, reliable collections, and automated failover. It can recover from failures and automatically redistribute load to healthy instances. In contrast, Zuul mainly focuses on routing and does not provide built-in fault tolerance mechanisms. It relies on the underlying microservices for handling failures and resilience.

  5. Monitoring and Diagnostics: Azure Service Fabric provides extensive monitoring and diagnostics capabilities. It includes built-in tools for monitoring application health, performance metrics, and traces. It also integrates with Azure Monitor for centralized logging and analysis. Zuul, being a gateway service, does not offer dedicated monitoring and diagnostics features. It relies on the monitoring capabilities provided by the underlying microservices.

  6. Supported Platforms: Azure Service Fabric is a fully managed service from Microsoft Azure and can be used on Azure cloud or on-premises infrastructure. It provides support for multiple languages and frameworks. Zuul, on the other hand, is an open-source gateway service developed by Netflix and primarily targets microservices architectures. It is language and framework agnostic and can be used in various cloud environments.

In summary, Azure Service Fabric and Zuul differ in their scalability models, service discovery and load balancing approaches, application packaging and deployment, fault tolerance and resilience mechanisms, monitoring and diagnostics features, as well as the platforms they are designed to work with.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Zuul
Zuul
Azure Service Fabric
Azure Service Fabric

It is the front door for all requests from devices and websites to the backend of the Netflix streaming application. As an edge service application, It is built to enable dynamic routing, monitoring, resiliency, and security. Routing is an integral part of a microservice architecture.

Azure Service Fabric is a distributed systems platform that makes it easy to package, deploy, and manage scalable and reliable microservices. Service Fabric addresses the significant challenges in developing and managing cloud apps.

-
Simplify microservices development and application lifecycle management; Reliably scale and orchestrate containers and microservices; Data-aware platform for low-latency, high-throughput workloads with stateful containers or microservices; Run anything – your choice of languages and programming models; Run anywhere – supports Windows/Linux in Azure, on-premises, or other clouds; Scales up to thousands of machines
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
399
Stacks
392
Stacks
103
Followers
385
Followers
284
Votes
8
Votes
26
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Load blancing
Pros
  • 5
    Intelligent, fast, reliable
  • 4
    Runs most of Azure core services
  • 3
    Reliability
  • 3
    Open source
  • 3
    Superior programming models

What are some alternatives to Zuul, Azure Service Fabric?

Istio

Istio

Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc.

Moleculer

Moleculer

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

Express Gateway

Express Gateway

A cloud-native microservices gateway completely configurable and extensible through JavaScript/Node.js built for ALL platforms and languages. Enterprise features are FREE thanks to the power of 3K+ ExpressJS battle hardened modules.

ArangoDB Foxx

ArangoDB Foxx

It is a JavaScript framework for writing data-centric HTTP microservices that run directly inside of ArangoDB.

Dapr

Dapr

It is a portable, event-driven runtime that makes it easy for developers to build resilient, stateless and stateful microservices that run on the cloud and edge and embraces the diversity of languages and developer frameworks.

linkerd

linkerd

linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing.

Jersey

Jersey

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

Ocelot

Ocelot

It is aimed at people using .NET running a micro services / service oriented architecture that need a unified point of entry into their system. However it will work with anything that speaks HTTP and run on any platform that ASP.NET Core supports. It manipulates the HttpRequest object into a state specified by its configuration until it reaches a request builder middleware where it creates a HttpRequestMessage object which is used to make a request to a downstream service.

Micro

Micro

Micro is a framework for cloud native development. Micro addresses the key requirements for building cloud native services. It leverages the microservices architecture pattern and provides a set of services which act as the building blocks

Claudia

Claudia

Claudia helps you deploy Node.js microservices to Amazon Web Services easily. It automates and simplifies deployment workflows and error prone tasks, so you can focus on important problems and not have to worry about AWS service quirks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana