StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Azure Storage vs Cloud Local Storage

Azure Storage vs Cloud Local Storage

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Stacks1.3K
Followers787
Votes52
Cloud Local Storage
Cloud Local Storage
Stacks4
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars29
Forks0

Azure Storage vs Cloud Local Storage: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Integration with Azure Services: Azure Storage tightly integrates with other Azure services, allowing for seamless data exchange and processing while Cloud Local Storage might require additional configurations and setup for integration with third-party services.

  2. Scalability: Azure Storage offers limitless scalability and can handle vast amounts of data seamlessly by automatically adjusting resources based on demand, whereas Cloud Local Storage might have limitations based on the hardware and capacity of the local storage system.

  3. Redundancy and Durability: Azure Storage provides multiple redundancy options to ensure data durability and availability, including geo-redundancy, while Cloud Local Storage might not offer such robust redundancy options.

  4. Cost Structure: Azure Storage offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where customers only pay for the storage capacity they use and the transactions they perform, allowing for cost optimization. In contrast, Cloud Local Storage might involve higher upfront costs for hardware and maintenance.

  5. Global Reach: Azure Storage has data centers worldwide, enabling data to be stored closer to users for faster access and compliance with data sovereignty laws. Cloud Local Storage is limited to the geographical location of the local storage system, potentially leading to slower access for global users.

  6. Security and Compliance: Azure Storage provides built-in security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access control mechanisms, and compliance certifications, ensuring data protection. Cloud Local Storage might require additional security measures and compliance checks to meet industry standards.

In Summary, Azure Storage offers seamless integration, scalability, redundancy, cost optimization, global reach, and enhanced security compared to Cloud Local Storage. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Azure Storage
Azure Storage
Cloud Local Storage
Cloud Local Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Serverless storage exposed via simple, familiar API. Simply call getItem & setItem, passing a name and a value and your data is stored forever on cloud-local-storage.

Blobs, Tables, Queues, and Files;Highly scalable;Durable & highly available;Premium Storage;Designed for developers
Data on firebase servers; SDK for Node and Web; Forever Free; Open-source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
29
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
4
Followers
787
Followers
5
Votes
52
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 24
    All-in-one storage solution
  • 15
    Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
  • 9
    Shared drive mapping
  • 2
    Cost-effective
  • 2
    Cheapest hot and cloud storage
Cons
  • 2
    Direct support is not provided by Azure storage
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Node.js
Node.js
Firebase
Firebase

What are some alternatives to Azure Storage, Cloud Local Storage?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase