StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. Beanstalkd vs Bull

Beanstalkd vs Bull

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Beanstalkd
Beanstalkd
Stacks111
Followers161
Votes74
Bull
Bull
Stacks92
Followers113
Votes1
GitHub Stars16.2K
Forks1.4K

Beanstalkd vs Bull: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Beanstalkd and Bull
Beanstalkd and Bull are both popular job queue services used in web development to manage background tasks efficiently. While they serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two that developers should consider before choosing one over the other.

1. **Backend Database Support**: Beanstalkd relies on a separate backend database to store job metadata, whereas Bull stores all job data in-memory or using a backend of your choice, providing more flexibility in terms of database support and management.
2. **Scalability**: Beanstalkd is designed to be lightweight and efficient for small to medium-scale applications, whereas Bull offers more robust features suitable for larger-scale applications that require high performance and scalability.
3. **Error Handling**: Beanstalkd lacks built-in support for handling failed jobs, while Bull provides comprehensive error handling mechanisms such as retries and custom error reporting, making it easier to manage and troubleshoot job failures.
4. **Task Priority Management**: Beanstalkd has limited support for task priorities, with a default FIFO (First In, First Out) approach, whereas Bull allows developers to assign priorities to tasks, enabling more control over task scheduling and execution.
5. **Event-Driven Architecture**: Bull utilizes an event-driven architecture, making it more suitable for applications that require real-time processing and handling of job events, whereas Beanstalkd follows a simple and straightforward design focused on job queuing and processing.
6. **Monitoring and Analytics**: Bull offers more extensive monitoring and analytics features, allowing developers to track job performance, monitor queue activity, and gather insights for optimization, compared to Beanstalkd's basic monitoring capabilities.

In Summary, developers should consider factors such as database support, scalability, error handling, task priorities, event-driven architecture, and monitoring capabilities when choosing between Beanstalkd and Bull for their job queue management needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalkd
Beanstalkd
Bull
Bull

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

-
Minimal CPU usage due to a polling-free design.; Robust design based on Redis.; Delayed jobs.; Schedule and repeat jobs according to a cron specification.; Rate limiter for jobs.; Retries.; Priority.; Concurrency.; Pause/resume—globally or locally.; Multiple job types per queue.; Threaded (sandboxed) processing functions.; Automatic recovery from process crashes.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
16.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.4K
Stacks
111
Stacks
92
Followers
161
Followers
113
Votes
74
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 23
    Fast
  • 12
    Does one thing well
  • 12
    Free
  • 9
    Scalability
  • 8
    Simplicity
Pros
  • 1
    Ease of use
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Beanstalkd, Bull?

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Hangfire

Hangfire

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

delayed_job

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Faktory

Faktory

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Kue

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Cron

Cron

Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.

PHP-FPM

PHP-FPM

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

Que

Que

Que is a high-performance alternative to DelayedJob or QueueClassic that improves the reliability of your application by protecting your jobs with the same ACID guarantees as the rest of your data.

Goose

Goose

It is a simple, reliable & scalable background processing library for Clojure. It has a transparent design & cloud-native architecture.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase