What is delayed_job?
Who uses delayed_job?
Why developers like delayed_job?
Here are some stack decisions, common use cases and reviews by companies and developers who chose delayed_job in their tech stack.
Docker Compose might have been a bit of overkill for a dev environment as a solo founder, but I'd found so much with past side projects (though this is no longer a side project) that I would frequently waste time every time I came back to work on the project getting my dev env sorted again.
Made the conscious choice to make a "prod-ish" docker-compose config up front to make sure that didn't bite me again.
Structured it so I have the following containers running
- server - the Rails app in API style
- client - the Create React App
- ngrok - ngrok to receive webhooks in dev
- db - PostgreSQL
- queues - delayed_job worker
delayed_job is a great Rails background job library for new projects, as it only uses what you already have: a relational database. We happily used it during the company’s first two years.
But it started to falter as our web and database transactions significantly grew. Our app interacted with users via SMS texts sent inside background jobs. Because the delayed_job daemon ran every couple seconds, this meant that users often waited several long seconds before getting text replies, which was not acceptable. Moreover, job processing was done inside AWS Elastic Beanstalk web instances, which were already under stress and not meant to handle jobs.
We needed a fast background job system that could process jobs in near real-time and integrate well with AWS. Sidekiq is a fast and popular Ruby background job library, but it does not leverage the Elastic Beanstalk worker architecture, and you have to maintain a Redis instance.
We ended up choosing active-elastic-job, which seamlessly integrates with worker instances and Amazon SQS. SQS is a fast queue and you don’t need to worry about infrastructure or scaling, as AWS handles it for you.
We noticed significant performance gains immediately after making the switch.
We use Sidekiq to process millions of Ruby background jobs a day under normal loads. We sometimes process more than that when running one-off backfill tasks.
With so many jobs, it wouldn't really make sense to use delayed_job, as it would put our main database under unnecessary load, which would make it a bottleneck with most DB queries serving jobs and not end users. I suppose you could create a separate DB just for jobs, but that can be a hassle. Sidekiq uses a separate Redis instance so you don't have this problem. And it is very performant!
I also like that its free version comes "batteries included" with:
- A web monitoring UI that provides some nice stats.
- An API that can come in handy for one-off tasks, like changing the queue of certain already enqueued jobs.
Sidekiq is a pleasure to use. All our engineers love it!