BigchainDB vs MySQL: What are the differences?
<BigchainDB vs. MySQL>
1. **Data Model**: BigchainDB is a NoSQL database that stores data as assets, transactions, and blocks which are immutable. In contrast, MySQL follows the relational database model, storing data in tables with rows and columns, allowing for complex relationships.
2. **Consensus Mechanism**: BigchainDB uses a Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus mechanism, where transactions are validated by a network of nodes. On the other hand, MySQL does not have a built-in consensus mechanism, relying on traditional methods for data validation and consensus.
3. **Scalability**: BigchainDB is designed for scalability with its blockchain architecture, allowing for high throughput and performance in decentralized applications. In comparison, MySQL may face limitations in scalability due to its traditional relational database design, especially in distributed environments.
4. **Transaction Speed**: BigchainDB offers faster transaction speeds as it leverages parallel processing and a distributed network for validating transactions. MySQL, while efficient for traditional queries and data manipulation, may not match the transaction speeds of BigchainDB in certain use cases.
5. **Data Security**: BigchainDB ensures data security through the immutability and transparency inherent in blockchain technology, making it tamper-proof and resistant to unauthorized changes. MySQL relies on security measures such as user authentication and access control, which may not provide the same level of data integrity as BigchainDB.
6. **Use Cases**: BigchainDB is well-suited for applications requiring provenance, supply chain management, and asset tracking due to its blockchain capabilities. MySQL, being a traditional relational database, is commonly used for structured data storage and retrieval in various applications.
In Summary, BigchainDB and MySQL differ in their data models, consensus mechanisms, scalability, transaction speeds, data security, and use cases.