StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Caddy vs Microsoft IIS

Caddy vs Microsoft IIS

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
Caddy
Caddy
Stacks363
Followers282
Votes20
GitHub Stars67.7K
Forks4.5K

Caddy vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Caddy and Microsoft IIS

Introduction

Caddy and Microsoft IIS are both web servers commonly used for hosting websites and applications. However, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Ease of Use: Caddy is known for its simplicity and ease of use. It has a user-friendly configuration format and automatic HTTPS by default, making it easy for developers to set up secure websites. On the other hand, Microsoft IIS can be more complex, requiring more configuration and setup steps.

  2. Web Server Architecture: Caddy is designed to be lightweight and efficient, using a concurrent architecture that allows it to handle multiple requests simultaneously. This makes it suitable for handling high traffic loads. In contrast, Microsoft IIS is based on a thread-based architecture, which can be less efficient when dealing with a large number of concurrent requests.

  3. Platform Compatibility: Caddy is built using the Go programming language, which allows it to be easily compiled and run on multiple platforms, including Windows, Linux, and macOS. This makes it a versatile choice for developers working on different operating systems. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, is primarily designed for Windows servers and does not have official support for other platforms.

  4. Performance and Scalability: Caddy is known for its high performance and efficiency, thanks to its lightweight design and modern architecture. It can handle a large number of concurrent requests and is optimized for speed. Microsoft IIS, while still capable of handling high traffic loads, may require more resources and configuration to achieve the same level of performance.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Caddy has a smaller but vibrant open-source community and ecosystem. It offers a wide range of plugins and integrations that can extend its functionality. Microsoft IIS, being a product of Microsoft, has a larger user base and a more extensive ecosystem with additional tools, documentation, and support options.

  6. Pricing and Licensing: Caddy is primarily licensed under the Apache 2.0 license, which allows for free usage and modification of the source code. It also offers a commercial license for enterprise customers. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, is a commercial product that requires a license for usage, which can be a significant cost factor for organizations.

In summary, Caddy stands out for its simplicity, lightweight architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and vibrant open-source community. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, offers a more extensive ecosystem, deep integration with Windows servers, and additional enterprise-level support options. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the project or organization.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft IIS, Caddy

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Caddy
Caddy

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

-
Static file server; Reverse proxy; Load balancing; Automatic HTTPS; TLS by default; Caddyfile; Config API; Config adapters; HTTP/1.1; HTTP/2; HTTP/3; Virtual hosting; TLS ceritificate auto-renew; Extensible; No dependencies; Fewer moving parts
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
67.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.5K
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
363
Followers
7.7K
Followers
282
Votes
236
Votes
20
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 6
    Sane config file syntax
  • 6
    Easy HTTP/2 Server Push
  • 4
    Builtin HTTPS
  • 2
    Runtime config API
  • 2
    Letsencrypt support
Cons
  • 3
    New kid

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, Caddy?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase