Cakebase vs Microsoft SQL Server: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**
Cakebase and Microsoft SQL Server are two popular database management systems, each with its own set of features and capabilities.

**1. Data Types:** Cakebase primarily supports schema-less data while Microsoft SQL Server uses a predefined schema with structured data types. This difference allows Cakebase to store unstructured data efficiently, making it suitable for projects with evolving data models.

**2. Query Language:** Cakebase relies on a JSON-like query language, making it ideal for developers who are familiar with JavaScript Object Notation. On the other hand, Microsoft SQL Server utilizes SQL as its query language, providing a robust and standardized way to interact with the database.

**3. Scalability:** Cakebase is designed to be horizontally scalable, meaning it can distribute data across multiple nodes to handle increasing workloads. In contrast, although Microsoft SQL Server can be scaled vertically by adding more resources to a single server, it may not offer the same level of scalability as Cakebase in terms of handling a large volume of data.

**4. Cost:** Cakebase is typically more cost-effective for small to medium-sized businesses due to its open-source nature and lower hardware requirements. Microsoft SQL Server, on the other hand, may involve licensing fees and potentially higher hardware costs, making it more suitable for larger enterprises with specific requirements and budgets.

**5. Ecosystem:** Cakebase has a more limited ecosystem compared to Microsoft SQL Server, which has a vast community, extensive documentation, and a wide range of third-party tools and integrations. This makes Microsoft SQL Server a preferred choice for organizations that rely on comprehensive support and resources for their database needs.

**6. ACID Compliance:** While both Cakebase and Microsoft SQL Server are ACID-compliant databases, the approach to achieving ACID properties may differ. Cakebase, being a NoSQL database, may prioritize partition tolerance over strong consistency in certain scenarios, whereas Microsoft SQL Server consistently focuses on maintaining strong consistency in data operations.

In Summary, Cakebase and Microsoft SQL Server differ in data types support, query languages, scalability options, cost implications, ecosystem availability, and ACID compliance approach.