Alternatives to Cilium logo

Alternatives to Cilium

Weave, Istio, Envoy, linkerd, and Postman are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Cilium.
39
81
+ 1
1

What is Cilium and what are its top alternatives?

Open source software for providing and transparently securing network connectivity and loadbalancing between application workloads such as application containers or processes.
Cilium is a tool in the Security category of a tech stack.
Cilium is an open source tool with 22.7K GitHub stars and 3.4K GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Cilium's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Cilium

  • Weave
    Weave

    Weave can traverse firewalls and operate in partially connected networks. Traffic can be encrypted, allowing hosts to be connected across an untrusted network. With weave you can easily construct applications consisting of multiple containers, running anywhere. ...

  • Istio
    Istio

    Istio is an open platform for providing a uniform way to integrate microservices, manage traffic flow across microservices, enforce policies and aggregate telemetry data. Istio's control plane provides an abstraction layer over the underlying cluster management platform, such as Kubernetes, Mesos, etc. ...

  • Envoy
    Envoy

    Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures. ...

  • linkerd
    linkerd

    linkerd is an out-of-process network stack for microservices. It functions as a transparent RPC proxy, handling everything needed to make inter-service RPC safe and sane--including load-balancing, service discovery, instrumentation, and routing. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Postman
    Postman

    It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide. ...

  • Stack Overflow
    Stack Overflow

    Stack Overflow is a question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers. It's built and run by you as part of the Stack Exchange network of Q&A sites. With your help, we're working together to build a library of detailed answers to every question about programming. ...

  • Google Maps
    Google Maps

    Create rich applications and stunning visualisations of your data, leveraging the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and usability of Google Maps and a modern web platform that scales as you grow. ...

Cilium alternatives & related posts

Weave logo

Weave

50
7
Weave creates a virtual network that connects Docker containers deployed across multiple hosts.
50
7
PROS OF WEAVE
  • 3
    Easy setup
  • 3
    Seamlessly with mesos/marathon
  • 1
    Seamless integration with application layer
CONS OF WEAVE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Weave posts

    Istio logo

    Istio

    960
    54
    Open platform to connect, manage, and secure microservices, by Google, IBM, and Lyft
    960
    54
    PROS OF ISTIO
    • 14
      Zero code for logging and monitoring
    • 9
      Service Mesh
    • 8
      Great flexibility
    • 5
      Resiliency
    • 5
      Powerful authorization mechanisms
    • 5
      Ingress controller
    • 4
      Easy integration with Kubernetes and Docker
    • 4
      Full Security
    CONS OF ISTIO
    • 17
      Performance

    related Istio posts

    Shared insights
    on
    IstioIstioDaprDapr

    At my company, we are trying to move away from a monolith into microservices led architecture. We are now stuck with a problem to establish a communication mechanism between microservices. Since, we are planning to use service meshes and something like Dapr/Istio, we are not sure on how to split services between the two. Service meshes offer Traffic Routing or Splitting whereas, Dapr can offer state management and service-service invocation. At the same time both of them provide mLTS, Metrics, Resiliency and tracing. How to choose who should offer what?

    See more
    Anas MOKDAD
    Shared insights
    on
    KongKongIstioIstio

    As for the new support of service mesh pattern by Kong, I wonder how does it compare to Istio?

    See more
    Envoy logo

    Envoy

    298
    9
    C++ front/service proxy
    298
    9
    PROS OF ENVOY
    • 9
      GRPC-Web
    CONS OF ENVOY
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Envoy posts

      Noah Zoschke
      Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 511.3K views

      We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. Behind the scenes the Config API is built with Go , GRPC and Envoy.

      At Segment, we build new services in Go by default. The language is simple so new team members quickly ramp up on a codebase. The tool chain is fast so developers get immediate feedback when they break code, tests or integrations with other systems. The runtime is fast so it performs great at scale.

      For the newest round of APIs we adopted the GRPC service #framework.

      The Protocol Buffer service definition language makes it easy to design type-safe and consistent APIs, thanks to ecosystem tools like the Google API Design Guide for API standards, uber/prototool for formatting and linting .protos and lyft/protoc-gen-validate for defining field validations, and grpc-gateway for defining REST mapping.

      With a well designed .proto, its easy to generate a Go server interface and a TypeScript client, providing type-safe RPC between languages.

      For the API gateway and RPC we adopted the Envoy service proxy.

      The internet-facing segmentapis.com endpoint is an Envoy front proxy that rate-limits and authenticates every request. It then transcodes a #REST / #JSON request to an upstream GRPC request. The upstream GRPC servers are running an Envoy sidecar configured for Datadog stats.

      The result is API #security , #reliability and consistent #observability through Envoy configuration, not code.

      We experimented with Swagger service definitions, but the spec is sprawling and the generated clients and server stubs leave a lot to be desired. GRPC and .proto and the Go implementation feels better designed and implemented. Thanks to the GRPC tooling and ecosystem you can generate Swagger from .protos, but it’s effectively impossible to go the other way.

      See more
      Joseph Irving
      DevOps Engineer at uSwitch · | 7 upvotes · 740.1K views
      Shared insights
      on
      KubernetesKubernetesEnvoyEnvoyGolangGolang
      at

      At uSwitch we wanted a way to load balance between our multiple Kubernetes clusters in AWS to give us added redundancy. We already had ingresses defined for all our applications so we wanted to build on top of that, instead of creating a new system that would require our various teams to change code/config etc.

      Envoy seemed to tick a lot of boxes:

      • Loadbalancing capabilities right out of the box: health checks, circuit breaking, retries etc.
      • Tracing and prometheus metrics support
      • Lightweight
      • Good community support

      This was all good but what really sold us was the api that supported dynamic configuration. This would allow us to dynamically configure envoy to route to ingresses and clusters as they were created or destroyed.

      To do this we built a tool called Yggdrasil using their Go sdk. Yggdrasil effectively just creates envoy configuration from Kubernetes ingress objects, so you point Yggdrasil at your kube clusters, it generates config from the ingresses and then envoy can loadbalance between your clusters for you. This is all done dynamically so as soon as new ingress is created the envoy nodes get updated with the new config. Importantly this all worked with what we already had, no need to create new config for every application, we just put this on top of it.

      See more
      linkerd logo

      linkerd

      130
      7
      Twitter-Style Operability for Microservices
      130
      7
      PROS OF LINKERD
      • 3
        CNCF Project
      • 1
        Service Mesh
      • 1
        Fast Integration
      • 1
        Pre-check permissions
      • 1
        Light Weight
      CONS OF LINKERD
        Be the first to leave a con

        related linkerd posts

        Postman logo

        Postman

        96.5K
        1.8K
        Only complete API development environment
        96.5K
        1.8K
        PROS OF POSTMAN
        • 490
          Easy to use
        • 369
          Great tool
        • 276
          Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
        • 156
          Easy setup, looks good
        • 144
          The best api workflow out there
        • 53
          It's the best
        • 53
          History feature
        • 44
          Adds real value to my workflow
        • 43
          Great interface that magically predicts your needs
        • 35
          The best in class app
        • 12
          Can save and share script
        • 10
          Fully featured without looking cluttered
        • 8
          Collections
        • 8
          Option to run scrips
        • 8
          Global/Environment Variables
        • 7
          Shareable Collections
        • 7
          Dead simple and useful. Excellent
        • 7
          Dark theme easy on the eyes
        • 6
          Awesome customer support
        • 6
          Great integration with newman
        • 5
          Documentation
        • 5
          Simple
        • 5
          The test script is useful
        • 4
          Saves responses
        • 4
          This has simplified my testing significantly
        • 4
          Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
        • 4
          Easy as pie
        • 3
          API-network
        • 3
          I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
        • 3
          Mocking API calls with predefined response
        • 2
          Now supports GraphQL
        • 2
          Postman Runner CI Integration
        • 2
          Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
        • 2
          Continuous integration using newman
        • 2
          Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
        • 2
          Runner
        • 2
          Graph
        • 1
          <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
        CONS OF POSTMAN
        • 10
          Stores credentials in HTTP
        • 9
          Bloated features and UI
        • 8
          Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
        • 7
          Poor GraphQL support
        • 5
          Expensive
        • 3
          Not free after 5 users
        • 3
          Can't prompt for per-request variables
        • 1
          Import swagger
        • 1
          Support websocket
        • 1
          Import curl

        related Postman posts

        Noah Zoschke
        Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.2M views

        We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

        Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

        Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

        This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

        Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

        Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

        Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.9M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more
        Postman logo

        Postman

        96.5K
        1.8K
        Only complete API development environment
        96.5K
        1.8K
        PROS OF POSTMAN
        • 490
          Easy to use
        • 369
          Great tool
        • 276
          Makes developing rest api's easy peasy
        • 156
          Easy setup, looks good
        • 144
          The best api workflow out there
        • 53
          It's the best
        • 53
          History feature
        • 44
          Adds real value to my workflow
        • 43
          Great interface that magically predicts your needs
        • 35
          The best in class app
        • 12
          Can save and share script
        • 10
          Fully featured without looking cluttered
        • 8
          Collections
        • 8
          Option to run scrips
        • 8
          Global/Environment Variables
        • 7
          Shareable Collections
        • 7
          Dead simple and useful. Excellent
        • 7
          Dark theme easy on the eyes
        • 6
          Awesome customer support
        • 6
          Great integration with newman
        • 5
          Documentation
        • 5
          Simple
        • 5
          The test script is useful
        • 4
          Saves responses
        • 4
          This has simplified my testing significantly
        • 4
          Makes testing API's as easy as 1,2,3
        • 4
          Easy as pie
        • 3
          API-network
        • 3
          I'd recommend it to everyone who works with apis
        • 3
          Mocking API calls with predefined response
        • 2
          Now supports GraphQL
        • 2
          Postman Runner CI Integration
        • 2
          Easy to setup, test and provides test storage
        • 2
          Continuous integration using newman
        • 2
          Pre-request Script and Test attributes are invaluable
        • 2
          Runner
        • 2
          Graph
        • 1
          <a href="http://fixbit.com/">useful tool</a>
        CONS OF POSTMAN
        • 10
          Stores credentials in HTTP
        • 9
          Bloated features and UI
        • 8
          Cumbersome to switch authentication tokens
        • 7
          Poor GraphQL support
        • 5
          Expensive
        • 3
          Not free after 5 users
        • 3
          Can't prompt for per-request variables
        • 1
          Import swagger
        • 1
          Support websocket
        • 1
          Import curl

        related Postman posts

        Noah Zoschke
        Engineering Manager at Segment · | 30 upvotes · 3.2M views

        We just launched the Segment Config API (try it out for yourself here) — a set of public REST APIs that enable you to manage your Segment configuration. A public API is only as good as its #documentation. For the API reference doc we are using Postman.

        Postman is an “API development environment”. You download the desktop app, and build API requests by URL and payload. Over time you can build up a set of requests and organize them into a “Postman Collection”. You can generalize a collection with “collection variables”. This allows you to parameterize things like username, password and workspace_name so a user can fill their own values in before making an API call. This makes it possible to use Postman for one-off API tasks instead of writing code.

        Then you can add Markdown content to the entire collection, a folder of related methods, and/or every API method to explain how the APIs work. You can publish a collection and easily share it with a URL.

        This turns Postman from a personal #API utility to full-blown public interactive API documentation. The result is a great looking web page with all the API calls, docs and sample requests and responses in one place. Check out the results here.

        Postman’s powers don’t end here. You can automate Postman with “test scripts” and have it periodically run a collection scripts as “monitors”. We now have #QA around all the APIs in public docs to make sure they are always correct

        Along the way we tried other techniques for documenting APIs like ReadMe.io or Swagger UI. These required a lot of effort to customize.

        Writing and maintaining a Postman collection takes some work, but the resulting documentation site, interactivity and API testing tools are well worth it.

        See more
        Simon Reymann
        Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 27 upvotes · 5.9M views

        Our whole Node.js backend stack consists of the following tools:

        • Lerna as a tool for multi package and multi repository management
        • npm as package manager
        • NestJS as Node.js framework
        • TypeScript as programming language
        • ExpressJS as web server
        • Swagger UI for visualizing and interacting with the API’s resources
        • Postman as a tool for API development
        • TypeORM as object relational mapping layer
        • JSON Web Token for access token management

        The main reason we have chosen Node.js over PHP is related to the following artifacts:

        • Made for the web and widely in use: Node.js is a software platform for developing server-side network services. Well-known projects that rely on Node.js include the blogging software Ghost, the project management tool Trello and the operating system WebOS. Node.js requires the JavaScript runtime environment V8, which was specially developed by Google for the popular Chrome browser. This guarantees a very resource-saving architecture, which qualifies Node.js especially for the operation of a web server. Ryan Dahl, the developer of Node.js, released the first stable version on May 27, 2009. He developed Node.js out of dissatisfaction with the possibilities that JavaScript offered at the time. The basic functionality of Node.js has been mapped with JavaScript since the first version, which can be expanded with a large number of different modules. The current package managers (npm or Yarn) for Node.js know more than 1,000,000 of these modules.
        • Fast server-side solutions: Node.js adopts the JavaScript "event-loop" to create non-blocking I/O applications that conveniently serve simultaneous events. With the standard available asynchronous processing within JavaScript/TypeScript, highly scalable, server-side solutions can be realized. The efficient use of the CPU and the RAM is maximized and more simultaneous requests can be processed than with conventional multi-thread servers.
        • A language along the entire stack: Widely used frameworks such as React or AngularJS or Vue.js, which we prefer, are written in JavaScript/TypeScript. If Node.js is now used on the server side, you can use all the advantages of a uniform script language throughout the entire application development. The same language in the back- and frontend simplifies the maintenance of the application and also the coordination within the development team.
        • Flexibility: Node.js sets very few strict dependencies, rules and guidelines and thus grants a high degree of flexibility in application development. There are no strict conventions so that the appropriate architecture, design structures, modules and features can be freely selected for the development.
        See more
        Stack Overflow logo

        Stack Overflow

        70.2K
        893
        Question and answer site for professional and enthusiast programmers
        70.2K
        893
        PROS OF STACK OVERFLOW
        • 257
          Scary smart community
        • 206
          Knows all
        • 142
          Voting system
        • 134
          Good questions
        • 83
          Good SEO
        • 22
          Addictive
        • 14
          Tight focus
        • 10
          Share and gain knowledge
        • 7
          Useful
        • 3
          Fast loading
        • 2
          Gamification
        • 1
          Knows everyone
        • 1
          Experts share experience and answer questions
        • 1
          Stack overflow to developers As google to net surfers
        • 1
          Questions answered quickly
        • 1
          No annoying ads
        • 1
          No spam
        • 1
          Fast community response
        • 1
          Good moderators
        • 1
          Quick answers from users
        • 1
          Good answers
        • 1
          User reputation ranking
        • 1
          Efficient answers
        • 1
          Leading developer community
        CONS OF STACK OVERFLOW
        • 3
          Not welcoming to newbies
        • 3
          Unfair downvoting
        • 3
          Unfriendly moderators
        • 3
          No opinion based questions
        • 3
          Mean users
        • 2
          Limited to types of questions it can accept

        related Stack Overflow posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more
        Google Maps logo

        Google Maps

        42.7K
        568
        Build highly customisable maps with your own content and imagery
        42.7K
        568
        PROS OF GOOGLE MAPS
        • 253
          Free
        • 136
          Address input through maps api
        • 82
          Sharable Directions
        • 47
          Google Earth
        • 46
          Unique
        • 3
          Custom maps designing
        • 1
          Eşya Depolama
        CONS OF GOOGLE MAPS
        • 5
          Google Attributions and logo
        • 2
          Only map allowed alongside google place autocomplete

        related Google Maps posts

        Tom Klein

        Google Analytics is a great tool to analyze your traffic. To debug our software and ask questions, we love to use Postman and Stack Overflow. Google Drive helps our team to share documents. We're able to build our great products through the APIs by Google Maps, CloudFlare, Stripe, PayPal, Twilio, Let's Encrypt, and TensorFlow.

        See more

        A huge component of our product relies on gathering public data about locations of interest. Google Places API gives us that ability in the most efficient way. Since we are primarily going to be using as google data as a source of information for our MVP, we might as well start integrating the Google Places API in our system. We have worked with Google Maps in the past and we might take some inspiration from our previous projects onto this one.

        See more