Cisco Firepower vs pfSense

Overview

pfSense

Stacks109

Followers95

Votes0

Cisco Firepower

Stacks10

Followers24

Votes0

Cisco Firepower vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Scalability: Cisco Firepower offers high scalability and can handle large networks with ease, making it a suitable choice for enterprise-level deployments. On the other hand, pfSense is better suited for smaller to medium-sized networks due to its limitations in scaling to very large deployments.
Integration with Cisco products: Cisco Firepower seamlessly integrates with other Cisco products and services, enabling easier management and streamlined network operations. In contrast, pfSense may require additional configurations and setups to integrate with Cisco products, which can be more time-consuming and complex.
Support and Updates: Cisco Firepower comes with dedicated support from Cisco, ensuring timely updates, patches, and technical assistance. PfSense, being an open-source solution, relies on community support which may not always be as prompt or reliable as vendor-provided support.
Feature Set: Cisco Firepower offers a comprehensive set of security features such as intrusion prevention, advanced threat detection, and deep packet inspection, making it a robust solution for network security. PfSense, while feature-rich, may not offer the same level of advanced security capabilities out-of-the-box.
Monitoring and Reporting: Cisco Firepower provides robust monitoring and reporting capabilities, allowing administrators to gain insights into network traffic, security events, and overall network performance. PfSense, while offering basic monitoring and reporting features, may require additional configurations or third-party tools for more in-depth analysis.
Cost: Cisco Firepower is a commercial solution that comes with a licensing fee, which may be a significant factor for organizations with budget constraints. In contrast, pfSense is an open-source solution, offering cost-effective network security options for organizations looking to minimize expenses.

In Summary, Cisco Firepower and pfSense differ in scalability, integration with Cisco products, support, feature set, monitoring and reporting capabilities, and cost.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

pfSense	Cisco Firepower
It is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. It is installed on a physical computer or a virtual machine to make a dedicated firewall/router for a network.	Protect your business while you grow your business. It offers performance, ease of use, and deep visibility and control to detect and stop threats fast. Its design optimizes security services without degrading network performance.
Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI); GeoIP blocking	Application Visibility and Control (AVC); Next-Gen IPS (NGIPS); Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Networks; URL Filtering
Statistics
Stacks 109	Stacks 10
Followers 95	Followers 24
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Squid OpenVPN OpenLDAP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to pfSense, Cisco Firepower?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Cisco Firepower vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Scalability: Cisco Firepower offers high scalability and can handle large networks with ease, making it a suitable choice for enterprise-level deployments. On the other hand, pfSense is better suited for smaller to medium-sized networks due to its limitations in scaling to very large deployments.
Integration with Cisco products: Cisco Firepower seamlessly integrates with other Cisco products and services, enabling easier management and streamlined network operations. In contrast, pfSense may require additional configurations and setups to integrate with Cisco products, which can be more time-consuming and complex.
Support and Updates: Cisco Firepower comes with dedicated support from Cisco, ensuring timely updates, patches, and technical assistance. PfSense, being an open-source solution, relies on community support which may not always be as prompt or reliable as vendor-provided support.
Feature Set: Cisco Firepower offers a comprehensive set of security features such as intrusion prevention, advanced threat detection, and deep packet inspection, making it a robust solution for network security. PfSense, while feature-rich, may not offer the same level of advanced security capabilities out-of-the-box.
Monitoring and Reporting: Cisco Firepower provides robust monitoring and reporting capabilities, allowing administrators to gain insights into network traffic, security events, and overall network performance. PfSense, while offering basic monitoring and reporting features, may require additional configurations or third-party tools for more in-depth analysis.
Cost: Cisco Firepower is a commercial solution that comes with a licensing fee, which may be a significant factor for organizations with budget constraints. In contrast, pfSense is an open-source solution, offering cost-effective network security options for organizations looking to minimize expenses.

In Summary, Cisco Firepower and pfSense differ in scalability, integration with Cisco products, support, feature set, monitoring and reporting capabilities, and cost.

Cisco Firepower vs pfSense

Overview