Cisco Identity Services Engine vs pfSense

Overview

pfSense

Stacks109

Followers95

Votes0

Cisco Identity Services Engine

Stacks2

Followers6

Votes0

Cisco Identity Services Engine vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown text, we will outline the key differences between Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and pfSense, two widely used network security solutions.

Licensing Model: Cisco ISE is a proprietary software that requires users to purchase a license for its full functionality, while pfSense is an open-source solution that can be downloaded and used for free. This difference in licensing models may make pfSense more accessible for smaller businesses or organizations with budget constraints.
Feature Set: Cisco ISE offers a comprehensive set of features for network access control, authentication, and policy enforcement, making it suitable for large enterprises with complex security requirements. On the other hand, pfSense focuses more on firewall and routing functionality, making it better suited for smaller or mid-sized organizations looking for a cost-effective security solution.
Vendor Support: As a proprietary solution, Cisco ISE comes with vendor support and regular updates from Cisco, providing users with a level of assurance and reliability. In comparison, pfSense relies on community support and may not offer the same level of technical assistance or timely updates as a commercial product like Cisco ISE.
Scalability: Cisco ISE is designed to scale efficiently to support thousands of devices and users in large networks, with built-in redundancy and high availability features. PfSense, while capable of handling medium-sized networks, may not offer the same level of scalability or performance as Cisco ISE in enterprise-grade deployments.
Integration Capabilities: Cisco ISE is designed to integrate seamlessly with other Cisco security products and network infrastructure, providing a holistic security solution for organizations using Cisco equipment. PfSense, while offering some integration options with third-party tools and services, may not have the same level of tight integration as Cisco ISE within a Cisco-centric network environment.

In Summary, the key differences between Cisco Identity Services Engine and pfSense lie in their licensing models, feature sets, vendor support, scalability, and integration capabilities, catering to different organizational needs and priorities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

pfSense	Cisco Identity Services Engine
It is an open source firewall/router computer software distribution based on FreeBSD. It is installed on a physical computer or a virtual machine to make a dedicated firewall/router for a network.	A critical component of any zero-trust strategy is securing the workplace that everyone and everything connects to. Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) enables a dynamic and automated approach to policy enforcement that simplifies the delivery of highly secure network access control. ISE empowers software-defined access and automates network segmentation within IT and OT environments.
Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI); GeoIP blocking	Gain visibility with context and control; Extend zero trust to contain threats; Accelerate value of existing solutions; Take the next step in secure access
Statistics
Stacks 109	Stacks 2
Followers 95	Followers 6
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Squid OpenVPN OpenLDAP	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to pfSense, Cisco Identity Services Engine?

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Virgil Security

Virgil consists of an open-source encryption library, which implements CMS and ECIES(including RSA schema), a Key Management API, and a cloud-based Key Management Service.

ExpeditedSSL

Stop pouring through MAN pages and outdated blog posts that don't take into account new requirements. With our add-on, you can go from install to confirmed installation in as little as twenty minutes: using nothing but your browser.

Clef

Clef is secure two-factor — built for consumers. Easy to use, integrate, and pay for.

Wazuh

It is a free, open source and enterprise-ready security monitoring solution for threat detection, integrity monitoring, incident response and compliance.

Detectify

Detectify is a web security service that simulates automated hacker attacks on your website, detecting critical security issues before real hackers do. We provide you with descriptive reports of the results so that you can continue to build safe products

SSLMate

SSLMate is the easiest way for developers and sysadmins to buy SSL certificates.

Related Comparisons

Cisco Identity Services Engine vs pfSense: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown text, we will outline the key differences between Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and pfSense, two widely used network security solutions.

Licensing Model: Cisco ISE is a proprietary software that requires users to purchase a license for its full functionality, while pfSense is an open-source solution that can be downloaded and used for free. This difference in licensing models may make pfSense more accessible for smaller businesses or organizations with budget constraints.
Feature Set: Cisco ISE offers a comprehensive set of features for network access control, authentication, and policy enforcement, making it suitable for large enterprises with complex security requirements. On the other hand, pfSense focuses more on firewall and routing functionality, making it better suited for smaller or mid-sized organizations looking for a cost-effective security solution.
Vendor Support: As a proprietary solution, Cisco ISE comes with vendor support and regular updates from Cisco, providing users with a level of assurance and reliability. In comparison, pfSense relies on community support and may not offer the same level of technical assistance or timely updates as a commercial product like Cisco ISE.
Scalability: Cisco ISE is designed to scale efficiently to support thousands of devices and users in large networks, with built-in redundancy and high availability features. PfSense, while capable of handling medium-sized networks, may not offer the same level of scalability or performance as Cisco ISE in enterprise-grade deployments.
Integration Capabilities: Cisco ISE is designed to integrate seamlessly with other Cisco security products and network infrastructure, providing a holistic security solution for organizations using Cisco equipment. PfSense, while offering some integration options with third-party tools and services, may not have the same level of tight integration as Cisco ISE within a Cisco-centric network environment.

Cisco Identity Services Engine vs pfSense

Overview