Overview

Cmder

Stacks45

Followers50

Votes0

GitHub Stars26.6K

Forks2.1K

ConEmu

Stacks30

Followers38

Votes0

Cmder vs ConEmu: What are the differences?

Key differences between Cmder and ConEmu

Cmder and ConEmu are both popular open-source terminal emulators for Windows that offer advanced features and customization options. However, there are several key differences between the two:

Ease of Installation: Cmder is designed to be a standalone package that includes all the necessary components and configurations out of the box. On the other hand, ConEmu requires separate installations of Cygwin or MSYS to provide similar functionality.
User Interface: Cmder has a more modern and visually appealing user interface, with a sleek black console and customizable color schemes. ConEmu, on the other hand, has a more traditional and utilitarian interface, which some users might prefer for its simplicity.
Integration with External Tools: Cmder comes bundled with several useful tools and software, such as Git, PowerShell, and SSH. This integration allows users to easily execute commands and utilize these tools without having to install them separately. ConEmu, on the other hand, does not come with any pre-installed tools and requires users to set up and configure external tools manually.
Customizability: Both Cmder and ConEmu offer extensive customization options, allowing users to personalize their terminal environment to their liking. However, Cmder provides a more user-friendly and intuitive configuration interface, making it easier for users to customize and fine-tune their settings.
Developer Support: Cmder is actively maintained and updated by a dedicated team of developers, which ensures a more stable and reliable experience. ConEmu, while still receiving occasional updates, has a smaller developer community and may not have the same level of ongoing support.
Resource Usage: Cmder is known for being lightweight and resource-efficient, making it an ideal choice for users with lower-end systems or limited resources. ConEmu, while still relatively lightweight, might consume slightly more system resources due to its additional features and compatibility with external tools.

In Summary, Cmder and ConEmu differ in terms of their installation process, user interface, integration with external tools, customizability, developer support, and resource usage. Choose Cmder for an easy-to-install, visually appealing, and feature-rich experience, while ConEmu offers a more traditional interface and greater flexibility for experienced users.

🔥 Trending in Build Automation on StackShare

npm

Build Automation

The package manager for JavaScript.

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

357

82.2k

Detailed Comparison

Cmder	ConEmu
It is a software package created out of pure frustration over the absence of nice console emulators on Windows. It is based on amazing software, and spiced up with the Monokai color scheme and a custom prompt layout.	It aims to be handy, comprehensive, fast and reliable terminal window where you may host any console application developed either for WinAPI (cmd, powershell, far) or Unix PTY (cygwin, msys, wsl bash).
Total portability; Keyboard shortcuts	smooth window resizing; tabs and splits (panes);
Statistics
GitHub Stars 26.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 45	Stacks 30
Followers 50	Followers 38
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Windows	Windows PowerShell

What are some alternatives to Cmder, ConEmu?

iTerm2

A replacement for Terminal and the successor to iTerm. It works on Macs with macOS 10.12 or newer. iTerm2 brings the terminal into the modern age with features you never knew you always wanted.

Windows Terminal

A new, modern, feature-rich, productive terminal application for command-line users. It includes many of the features most frequently requested by the Windows command-line community.

Putty

It is an SSH and telnet client, developed originally by Simon Tatham for the Windows platform. It is open source software that is available with source code and is developed and supported by a group of volunteers.

Alacritty

It is the fastest terminal emulator in existence. Using the GPU for rendering enables optimizations that simply aren't possible without it. It currently supports macOS, Linux, BSD, and Windows.

Hyper Terminal

The goal of the project is to create a beautiful and extensible experience for command-line interface users, built on open web standards. Focus will be primarily around speed and stability.

SecureCRT

It provides rock-solid terminal emulation for computing professionals, raising productivity with advanced session management and a host of ways to save time and streamline repetitive tasks. It provides secure remote access, file transfer, and data tunneling for everyone in your organization.

Wave Terminal

It is an open-source, AI-native terminal that streamlines developer workflows with inline rendering, a modern UI, and persistent sessions. It offers plugins for rendering various file types, a powerful code editor, seamless local and remote session management, and native AI integration.