StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CUBA Platform vs Spring MVC

CUBA Platform vs Spring MVC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Stacks479
Followers519
Votes0
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform
Stacks10
Followers23
Votes3
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks216

CUBA Platform vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

1. **Architecture**: CUBA Platform follows a full-stack architecture where the backend and frontend components are tightly integrated with a common data model and domain-specific language, while Spring MVC is a lightweight framework focused on building web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern. 2. **Visual Components**: CUBA Platform provides a set of rich user interface components out of the box, allowing developers to quickly create sophisticated web applications, whereas Spring MVC does not offer as many pre-built visual components, requiring developers to rely more on third-party libraries or custom implementations. 3. **Metadata-driven Development**: CUBA Platform enables metadata-driven development, allowing developers to define entities, screens, and business logic using a visual designer without writing boilerplate code, while Spring MVC requires developers to write more code manually for configuring and mapping components. 4. **Security Features**: CUBA Platform includes built-in security features such as role-based access control, data-level security, and auditing mechanisms, making it easier for developers to implement and manage security in their applications compared to Spring MVC, where developers need to rely on third-party security libraries or custom implementations. 5. **Built-in Data Management**: CUBA Platform provides built-in data management features including data modeling tools, ORM integration, and data access layers, simplifying the process of working with databases, whereas Spring MVC requires developers to manually implement data management solutions using frameworks like Hibernate or MyBatis. 6. **Integration with Middleware Services**: CUBA Platform offers seamless integration with middleware services such as BPM engines, reporting tools, and authentication providers through its extensible architecture, whereas Spring MVC may require more manual configuration and overhead to integrate with such services.

In Summary, the key differences between CUBA Platform and Spring MVC lie in their architecture, visual components, metadata-driven development capabilities, security features, data management tools, and integration with middleware services.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform

A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.

It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development.

Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Generic user interface; Multiple data stores; User management; Data access control; Full audit of user actions; Dynamic attributes; File storage; Admin tools; Scheduled tasks; Generic REST API; Single sign-on
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
216
Stacks
479
Stacks
10
Followers
519
Followers
23
Votes
0
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Component based
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Lots out of the box
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Hibernate
Hibernate
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spring MVC, CUBA Platform?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase