Flurl vs cURL

Overview

cURL

Stacks525

Followers254

Votes1

GitHub Stars39.8K

Forks6.9K

Flurl

Stacks320

Followers5

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.4K

Forks396

Flurl vs cURL: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flurl and cURL are both widely used tools for making HTTP requests, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Here are six specific differences between Flurl and cURL:

Ease of use and syntax: Flurl, being a .NET library, provides a fluent and intuitive API, allowing developers to write clean and readable code using method chaining. On the other hand, cURL is a command-line tool that requires writing complex commands with various options and flags.
Platform compatibility: Flurl is built on top of the .NET framework and runs exclusively on Windows systems, while cURL is a cross-platform tool that can be used on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Programming language: Flurl is written in C# and is primarily used with .NET development, providing seamless integration with other .NET libraries and frameworks. In contrast, cURL is implemented in C and can be used with various programming languages as it provides a command-line interface.
Capabilities: Flurl is specifically designed for building and consuming HTTP APIs, providing features such as URL building, query parameters, authentication, request headers, and response handling. cURL, on the other hand, is a more versatile tool and supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, FTP, SMTP, and more.
Integration and extensibility: Flurl integrates well with other .NET libraries and frameworks, allowing developers to leverage the existing ecosystem of tools and functionalities. It also provides extensibility through custom plugins and extensions. In comparison, cURL can be integrated into various programming languages and frameworks using system calls or wrappers, but it may require additional effort for seamless integration.
User interface: Flurl lacks a graphical user interface (GUI) as it is primarily used within code. On the contrary, cURL provides a command-line interface that allows users to interact with it directly without the need for writing code.

In summary, Flurl is a user-friendly .NET library designed for building and consuming HTTP APIs, while cURL is a versatile command-line tool that supports multiple protocols and can be used with various programming languages and operating systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

cURL	Flurl
Used in command lines or scripts to transfer data. It is also used in cars, television sets, routers, printers, audio equipment, mobile phones, tablets, and is the internet transfer backbone for thousands of software applications affecting billions of humans daily.	It is a modern, fluent, asynchronous, testable, portable, buzzword-laden URL builder and HTTP client library for .NET.
-	Modern; Fluent; Asynchronous; Testable; Portable
Statistics
GitHub Stars 39.8K	GitHub Stars 4.4K
GitHub Forks 6.9K	GitHub Forks 396
Stacks 525	Stacks 320
Followers 254	Followers 5
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Quickly view HTTP headers	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	.NET

What are some alternatives to cURL, Flurl?

WeTransfer

It is file sharing at its simplest. It works as if your e-mail account can support those large file sizes, you type in your e-mail address and the recipient’s e-mail address, add a message, attach the file, and send.

FileZilla

It is a powerful and free software for transferring files over the Internet. It is a very popular FTP client and is used by webmasters from all over the world.

WinSCP

It is a popular SFTP client and FTP client for Microsoft Windows. Copy file between a local computer and remote servers using FTP, FTPS, SCP, SFTP, WebDAV or S3 file transfer protocols.

HTTPie

It is a Modern command line HTTP client – user-friendly curl alternative with intuitive UI, JSON support, syntax highlighting, wget-like downloads, extensions, etc

Cyberduck

It is a libre server and cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows with support for FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox.

AWS Transfer for SFTP

AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that enables the transfer of files directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP)—also known as Secure Shell (SSH) File Transfer Protocol. AWS helps you seamlessly migrate your file transfer workflows to AWS Transfer for SFTP—by integrating with existing authentication systems, and providing DNS routing with Amazon Route 53—so nothing changes for your customers and partners, or their applications.

telegram-download-deamon

A simple script to automate telegram download of big files. If you have got an Internet connected computer or NAS and you want to automate file downloading from Telegram channels, this daemon is for you.

MEDoc

It is the best assistant in working with all types of documents in electronic form: tax invoices, acts, invoices and reports.

Couchdrop

Couchdrop is a cloud-native b2b file exchange platform that simplifies secure file transfers across organizational boundaries with zero infrastructure management.

Mover

Mover is the best way to migrate or back up files between cloud storage providers and traditional servers. We connect to services like Dropbox, Box, Google Drive, OneDrive, FTP, WebDAV, S3 and many others.

Related Comparisons

Flurl vs cURL: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flurl and cURL are both widely used tools for making HTTP requests, but they have some key differences that set them apart. Here are six specific differences between Flurl and cURL:

Ease of use and syntax: Flurl, being a .NET library, provides a fluent and intuitive API, allowing developers to write clean and readable code using method chaining. On the other hand, cURL is a command-line tool that requires writing complex commands with various options and flags.
Platform compatibility: Flurl is built on top of the .NET framework and runs exclusively on Windows systems, while cURL is a cross-platform tool that can be used on various operating systems such as Windows, macOS, and Linux.
Programming language: Flurl is written in C# and is primarily used with .NET development, providing seamless integration with other .NET libraries and frameworks. In contrast, cURL is implemented in C and can be used with various programming languages as it provides a command-line interface.
Capabilities: Flurl is specifically designed for building and consuming HTTP APIs, providing features such as URL building, query parameters, authentication, request headers, and response handling. cURL, on the other hand, is a more versatile tool and supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, FTP, SMTP, and more.
Integration and extensibility: Flurl integrates well with other .NET libraries and frameworks, allowing developers to leverage the existing ecosystem of tools and functionalities. It also provides extensibility through custom plugins and extensions. In comparison, cURL can be integrated into various programming languages and frameworks using system calls or wrappers, but it may require additional effort for seamless integration.
User interface: Flurl lacks a graphical user interface (GUI) as it is primarily used within code. On the contrary, cURL provides a command-line interface that allows users to interact with it directly without the need for writing code.

Flurl vs cURL

Overview