Alternatives to DigitalOcean Spaces logo

Alternatives to DigitalOcean Spaces

Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, DigitalOcean Block Storage, Dropbox, and CloudFlare are the most popular alternatives and competitors to DigitalOcean Spaces.
60
87
+ 1
4

What is DigitalOcean Spaces and what are its top alternatives?

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.
DigitalOcean Spaces is a tool in the Cloud Storage category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to DigitalOcean Spaces

  • Amazon S3

    Amazon S3

    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web ...

  • Google Cloud Storage

    Google Cloud Storage

    Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure. ...

  • DigitalOcean Block Storage

    DigitalOcean Block Storage

    Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs. ...

  • Dropbox

    Dropbox

    Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more. ...

  • CloudFlare

    CloudFlare

    Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet. ...

  • Amazon EBS

    Amazon EBS

    Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage. ...

  • Azure Storage

    Azure Storage

    Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud. ...

  • Minio

    Minio

    Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License ...

DigitalOcean Spaces alternatives & related posts

Amazon S3 logo

Amazon S3

41.7K
30.1K
2K
Store and retrieve any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
41.7K
30.1K
+ 1
2K
PROS OF AMAZON S3
  • 591
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 328
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
  • 29
    Logical
  • 12
    Easy Setup
  • 11
    1000+ POPs
  • 10
    REST API
  • 5
    Secure
  • 3
    Easy
  • 2
    Web UI for uploading files
  • 2
    Plug and play
  • 1
    GDPR ready
  • 1
    Flexible
  • 1
    Faster on response
  • 1
    Plug-gable
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Easy integration with CloudFront
CONS OF AMAZON S3
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 5
    Requires a credit card
  • 3
    Complex to set up

related Amazon S3 posts

Ashish Singh
Tech Lead, Big Data Platform at Pinterest | 36 upvotes 路 921.5K views

To provide employees with the critical need of interactive querying, we鈥檝e worked with Presto, an open-source distributed SQL query engine, over the years. Operating Presto at Pinterest鈥檚 scale has involved resolving quite a few challenges like, supporting deeply nested and huge thrift schemas, slow/ bad worker detection and remediation, auto-scaling cluster, graceful cluster shutdown and impersonation support for ldap authenticator.

Our infrastructure is built on top of Amazon EC2 and we leverage Amazon S3 for storing our data. This separates compute and storage layers, and allows multiple compute clusters to share the S3 data.

We have hundreds of petabytes of data and tens of thousands of Apache Hive tables. Our Presto clusters are comprised of a fleet of 450 r4.8xl EC2 instances. Presto clusters together have over 100 TBs of memory and 14K vcpu cores. Within Pinterest, we have close to more than 1,000 monthly active users (out of total 1,600+ Pinterest employees) using Presto, who run about 400K queries on these clusters per month.

Each query submitted to Presto cluster is logged to a Kafka topic via Singer. Singer is a logging agent built at Pinterest and we talked about it in a previous post. Each query is logged when it is submitted and when it finishes. When a Presto cluster crashes, we will have query submitted events without corresponding query finished events. These events enable us to capture the effect of cluster crashes over time.

Each Presto cluster at Pinterest has workers on a mix of dedicated AWS EC2 instances and Kubernetes pods. Kubernetes platform provides us with the capability to add and remove workers from a Presto cluster very quickly. The best-case latency on bringing up a new worker on Kubernetes is less than a minute. However, when the Kubernetes cluster itself is out of resources and needs to scale up, it can take up to ten minutes. Some other advantages of deploying on Kubernetes platform is that our Presto deployment becomes agnostic of cloud vendor, instance types, OS, etc.

#BigData #AWS #DataScience #DataEngineering

See more
Simon Reymann
Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH | 28 upvotes 路 3.5M views

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively Git as revision control system
  • SourceTree as Git GUI
  • Visual Studio Code as IDE
  • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
  • SonarQube as quality gate
  • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
  • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
  • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
  • Heroku for deploying in test environments
  • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
  • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
  • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
See more
Google Cloud Storage logo

Google Cloud Storage

1.2K
1K
73
Durable and highly available object storage service
1.2K
1K
+ 1
73
PROS OF GOOGLE CLOUD STORAGE
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 18
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
  • 1
    More praticlal and easy
CONS OF GOOGLE CLOUD STORAGE
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Google Cloud Storage posts

    Aliadoc Team

    In #Aliadoc, we're exploring the crowdfunding option to get traction before launch. We are building a SaaS platform for website design customization.

    For the Admin UI and website editor we use React and we're currently transitioning from a Create React App setup to a custom one because our needs have become more specific. We use CloudFlare as much as possible, it's a great service.

    For routing dynamic resources and proxy tasks to feed websites to the editor we leverage CloudFlare Workers for improved responsiveness. We use Firebase for our hosting needs and user authentication while also using several Cloud Functions for Firebase to interact with other services along with Google App Engine and Google Cloud Storage, but also the Real Time Database is on the radar for collaborative website editing.

    We generally hate configuration but honestly because of the stage of our project we lack resources for doing heavy sysops work. So we are basically just relying on Serverless technologies as much as we can to do all server side processing.

    Visual Studio Code definitively makes programming a much easier and enjoyable task, we just love it. We combine it with Bitbucket for our source code control needs.

    See more
    DigitalOcean Block Storage logo

    DigitalOcean Block Storage

    10
    18
    2
    Attach highly available and scalable SSD-based Block Storage to your Droplet
    10
    18
    + 1
    2
    PROS OF DIGITALOCEAN BLOCK STORAGE
    • 1
      Easy to use
    • 1
      Cheap
    CONS OF DIGITALOCEAN BLOCK STORAGE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related DigitalOcean Block Storage posts

      Dropbox logo

      Dropbox

      19.2K
      14.6K
      1.7K
      Build the power of Dropbox into your apps
      19.2K
      14.6K
      + 1
      1.7K
      PROS OF DROPBOX
      • 432
        Easy to work with
      • 256
        Free
      • 215
        Popular
      • 175
        Shared file hosting
      • 168
        'just works'
      • 100
        No brainer
      • 79
        Integration with external services
      • 76
        Simple
      • 49
        Good api
      • 38
        Least cost (free) for the basic needs case
      • 10
        It just works
      • 7
        Convenient
      • 6
        Accessible from all of my devices
      • 5
        Command Line client
      • 3
        Can even be used by your grandma
      • 3
        Synchronizing laptop and desktop - work anywhere
      • 3
        Mac app
      • 3
        Sync API
      • 2
        Beautiful UI
      • 2
        Ability to pay monthly without losing your files
      • 2
        Extended version history
      • 2
        Delta synchronization
      • 2
        Cross platform app
      • 2
        Reliable
      • 1
        Cons
      • 1
        YC Company
      • 1
        Pros
      • 1
        What a beautiful app
      • 1
        The more the merrier
      • 1
        So easy
      • 1
        For when client needs file without opening firewall
      • 1
        Easy/no setup
      • 1
        Easy to work with
      • 1
        Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliabl
      • 1
        Everybody needs to share and synchronize files reliably
      • 1
        Backups, local and cloud
      • 1
        Easy to use
      • 0
        The more the merrier
      CONS OF DROPBOX
      • 3
        Personal vs company account is confusing
      • 1
        Replication kills CPU and battery

      related Dropbox posts

      Shared insights
      on
      BoxBoxDropboxDropboxKloudlessKloudless

      Anyone recommend a good connector like Kloudless for connecting a SaaS app to Dropbox/Box etc? Cheers

      See more
      Jorge Cortell
      Founder & CEO at Kanteron Systems | 1 upvote 路 130.1K views

      We originally used Dropbox as an easy way to store and share documents, but moved to the much more powerful and convenient Google Drive, although we still use Dropbox occasionally.

      See more
      CloudFlare logo

      CloudFlare

      67.5K
      15.2K
      1.7K
      The Web Performance & Security Company.
      67.5K
      15.2K
      + 1
      1.7K
      PROS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 420
        Easy setup, great cdn
      • 274
        Free ssl
      • 196
        Easy setup
      • 184
        Security
      • 179
        Ssl
      • 94
        Great cdn
      • 76
        Optimizer
      • 69
        Simple
      • 43
        Great UI
      • 28
        Great js cdn
      • 11
        HTTP/2 Support
      • 11
        AutoMinify
      • 11
        Apps
      • 11
        DNS Analytics
      • 8
        Ipv6
      • 8
        Easy
      • 8
        Rocket Loader
      • 7
        IPv6 "One Click"
      • 6
        Free GeoIP
      • 6
        Fantastic CDN service
      • 6
        Nice DNS
      • 6
        SSHFP
      • 6
        Cheapest SSL
      • 6
        Amazing performance
      • 6
        API
      • 5
        Free and reliable, Faster then anyone else
      • 5
        SPDY
      • 5
        DNSSEC
      • 4
        Asynchronous resource loading
      • 4
        Ip
      • 3
        Easy Use
      • 3
        Ubuntu
      • 3
        Global Load Balancing
      • 3
        Performance
      • 1
        CDN
      • 1
        Maker
      • 1
        Support for SSHFP records
      • 1
        Mtn
      CONS OF CLOUDFLARE
      • 1
        Expensive when you exceed their fair usage limits
      • 1
        No support for SSHFP records

      related CloudFlare posts

      Johnny Bell

      When I first built my portfolio I used GitHub for the source control and deployed directly to Netlify on a push to master. This was a perfect setup, I didn't need any knowledge about #DevOps or anything, it was all just done for me.

      One of the issues I had with Netlify was I wanted to gzip my JavaScript files, I had this setup in my #Webpack file, however Netlify didn't offer an easy way to set this.

      Over the weekend I decided I wanted to know more about how #DevOps worked so I decided to switch from Netlify to Amazon S3. Instead of creating any #Git Webhooks I decided to use Buddy for my pipeline and to run commands. Buddy is a fantastic tool, very easy to setup builds, copying the files to my Amazon S3 bucket, then running some #AWS console commands to set the content-encoding of the JavaScript files. - Buddy is also free if you only have a few pipelines, so I didn't need to pay anything 馃馃徎.

      When I made these changes I also wanted to monitor my code, and make sure I was keeping up with the best practices so I implemented Code Climate to look over my code and tell me where there code smells, issues, and other issues I've been super happy with it so far, on the free tier so its also free.

      I did plan on using Amazon CloudFront for my SSL and cacheing, however it was overly complex to setup and it costs money. So I decided to go with the free tier of CloudFlare and it is amazing, best choice I've made for caching / SSL in a long time.

      See more
      Johnny Bell

      I recently moved my portfolio to Amazon S3 and I needed a new way to cache and SSL my site as Amazon S3 does not come with this right out of the box. I tried Amazon CloudFront as I was already on Amazon S3 I thought this would be super easy and straight forward to setup... It was not, I was unable to get this working even though I followed all the online steps and even reached out for help to Amazon.

      I'd used CloudFlare in the past, and thought let me see if I can set up CloudFlare on an Amazon S3 bucket. The setup for this was so basic and easy... I had it setup with caching and SSL within 5 minutes, and it was 100% free.

      See more
      Amazon EBS logo

      Amazon EBS

      660
      501
      82
      Block level storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances.
      660
      501
      + 1
      82
      PROS OF AMAZON EBS
      • 36
        Point-in-time snapshots
      • 27
        Data reliability
      • 19
        Configurable i/o performance
      CONS OF AMAZON EBS
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Amazon EBS posts

        We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.

        We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.

        We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.

        You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?

        See more
        Azure Storage logo

        Azure Storage

        611
        666
        51
        Reliable, economical cloud storage for data big and small
        611
        666
        + 1
        51
        PROS OF AZURE STORAGE
        • 23
          All-in-one storage solution
        • 15
          Pay only for data used regardless of disk size
        • 9
          Shared drive mapping
        • 2
          Cost-effective
        • 2
          Cheapest hot and cloud storage
        CONS OF AZURE STORAGE
        • 2
          Direct support is not provided by Azure storage

        related Azure Storage posts

        Minio logo

        Minio

        293
        478
        37
        AWS S3 open source alternative written in Go
        293
        478
        + 1
        37
        PROS OF MINIO
        • 8
          Store and Serve Resumes & Job Description PDF, Backups
        • 5
          S3 Compatible
        • 4
          Simple
        • 4
          Open Source
        • 3
          Encryption and Tamper-Proof
        • 2
          Highly Available
        • 2
          Pluggable Storage Backend
        • 2
          Lambda Compute
        • 2
          Private Cloud Storage
        • 2
          Scalable
        • 2
          Data Protection
        • 1
          Performance
        CONS OF MINIO
        • 2
          Deletion of huge buckets is not possible

        related Minio posts