StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. DuckDB vs Firebird

DuckDB vs Firebird

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Firebird
Firebird
Stacks83
Followers121
Votes9
GitHub Stars1.4K
Forks263
DuckDB
DuckDB
Stacks49
Followers60
Votes0

DuckDB vs Firebird: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between DuckDB and Firebird

DuckDB is an embeddable analytical database management system, whereas Firebird is a relational database management system utilizing a client/server architecture for cross-platform support. DuckDB is primarily optimized for analytical queries, designed to handle complex data analysis tasks efficiently. On the other hand, Firebird emphasizes transactional processing capabilities, supporting ACID compliance for ensuring data integrity.

DuckDB provides vectorized query execution, enabling faster processing of large datasets through SIMD instructions and cache-conscious algorithms, resulting in improved query performance. In contrast, Firebird relies on more traditional execution techniques, which may impact the performance of complex analytical workloads when compared to DuckDB's optimized approach.

DuckDB supports various data types commonly used in analytical tasks, such as arrays and JSON, making it suitable for handling diverse data structures efficiently. In contrast, Firebird offers a broader range of data types to accommodate different needs, including character large objects (CLOBs) and binary large objects (BLOBs), catering to a wider spectrum of database requirements beyond analytical workloads.

DuckDB's shared-nothing architecture enables horizontal scalability by distributing data across nodes, allowing for seamless expansion and improved performance in distributed environments. Meanwhile, Firebird's client/server architecture may require additional configuration and management to scale horizontally, affecting the agility and ease of scalability compared to DuckDB's more streamlined approach.

DuckDB is written in C++ and provides an easy-to-use Python interface, offering flexibility in integration with other data science tools and frameworks for seamless workflow orchestration. In contrast, Firebird is implemented in C and supports various programming languages, such as Java and Python, providing developers with a wider range of options for application development and database interaction.

DuckDB focuses on efficient analytical processing and is well-suited for data exploration and advanced analytics tasks that demand high performance and scalability. In contrast, Firebird's strength lies in transaction processing and reliability, making it a robust choice for applications requiring strict data consistency and integrity.

In Summary, DuckDB is optimized for analytical queries with a focus on performance and scalability, while Firebird excels in transaction processing and data reliability, catering to different database needs based on specific use cases and requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Firebird
Firebird
DuckDB
DuckDB

Firebird is a relational database offering many ANSI SQL standard features that runs on Linux, Windows, MacOS and a variety of Unix platforms. Firebird offers excellent concurrency, high performance, and powerful language support for stored procedures and triggers. It has been used in production systems, under a variety of names, since 1981.

It is an embedded database designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast while embedded in another process. It is designed to be easy to install and easy to use. DuckDB has no external dependencies. It has bindings for C/C++, Python and R.

-
Embedded database; Designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast; No external dependencies
Statistics
GitHub Stars
1.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
263
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
83
Stacks
49
Followers
121
Followers
60
Votes
9
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Open-Source
  • 3
    Free
  • 1
    Great Performance
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Upgrade from MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL
Cons
  • 2
    Speed
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
C++
C++
R Language
R Language

What are some alternatives to Firebird, DuckDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase