Alternatives to Ebean logo

Alternatives to Ebean

jOOQ, Hibernate, MyBatis, Slick, and MySQL are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Ebean.
10
21
+ 1
0

What is Ebean and what are its top alternatives?

It is an object-relational mapping product written in Java. It is designed to be simpler to use and understand than JPA or JDO products.
Ebean is a tool in the Object Relational Mapper (ORM) category of a tech stack.
Ebean is an open source tool with 1.5K GitHub stars and 265 GitHub forks. Here’s a link to Ebean's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to Ebean

  • jOOQ
    jOOQ

    It implements the active record pattern. Its purpose is to be both relational and object oriented by providing a domain-specific language to construct queries from classes generated from a database schema. ...

  • Hibernate
    Hibernate

    Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper. ...

  • MyBatis
    MyBatis

    It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records. ...

  • Slick
    Slick

    It is a modern database query and access library for Scala. It allows you to work with stored data almost as if you were using Scala collections while at the same time giving you full control over when a database access happens and which data is transferred. ...

  • MySQL
    MySQL

    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software. ...

  • PostgreSQL
    PostgreSQL

    PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions. ...

  • MongoDB
    MongoDB

    MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding. ...

  • Redis
    Redis

    Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams. ...

Ebean alternatives & related posts

jOOQ logo

jOOQ

110
1
A light database-mapping software library
110
1
PROS OF JOOQ
  • 1
    Easy dsl
CONS OF JOOQ
    Be the first to leave a con

    related jOOQ posts

    Hibernate logo

    Hibernate

    1.5K
    34
    Idiomatic persistence for Java and relational databases.
    1.5K
    34
    PROS OF HIBERNATE
    • 22
      Easy ORM
    • 8
      Easy transaction definition
    • 3
      Is integrated with spring jpa
    • 1
      Open Source
    CONS OF HIBERNATE
    • 3
      Can't control proxy associations when entity graph used

    related Hibernate posts

    Ganesa Vijayakumar
    Full Stack Coder | Technical Architect · | 19 upvotes · 5.7M views

    I'm planning to create a web application and also a mobile application to provide a very good shopping experience to the end customers. Shortly, my application will be aggregate the product details from difference sources and giving a clear picture to the user that when and where to buy that product with best in Quality and cost.

    I have planned to develop this in many milestones for adding N number of features and I have picked my first part to complete the core part (aggregate the product details from different sources).

    As per my work experience and knowledge, I have chosen the followings stacks to this mission.

    UI: I would like to develop this application using React, React Router and React Native since I'm a little bit familiar on this and also most importantly these will help on developing both web and mobile apps. In addition, I'm gonna use the stacks JavaScript, jQuery, jQuery UI, jQuery Mobile, Bootstrap wherever required.

    Service: I have planned to use Java as the main business layer language as I have 7+ years of experience on this I believe I can do better work using Java than other languages. In addition, I'm thinking to use the stacks Node.js.

    Database and ORM: I'm gonna pick MySQL as DB and Hibernate as ORM since I have a piece of good knowledge and also work experience on this combination.

    Search Engine: I need to deal with a large amount of product data and it's in-detailed info to provide enough details to end user at the same time I need to focus on the performance area too. so I have decided to use Solr as a search engine for product search and suggestions. In addition, I'm thinking to replace Solr by Elasticsearch once explored/reviewed enough about Elasticsearch.

    Host: As of now, my plan to complete the application with decent features first and deploy it in a free hosting environment like Docker and Heroku and then once it is stable then I have planned to use the AWS products Amazon S3, EC2, Amazon RDS and Amazon Route 53. I'm not sure about Microsoft Azure that what is the specialty in it than Heroku and Amazon EC2 Container Service. Anyhow, I will do explore these once again and pick the best suite one for my requirement once I reached this level.

    Build and Repositories: I have decided to choose Apache Maven and Git as these are my favorites and also so popular on respectively build and repositories.

    Additional Utilities :) - I would like to choose Codacy for code review as their Startup plan will be very helpful to this application. I'm already experienced with Google CheckStyle and SonarQube even I'm looking something on Codacy.

    Happy Coding! Suggestions are welcome! :)

    Thanks, Ganesa

    See more
    NIDHISH PUTHIYADATH
    Lead Software Engineer at EDIFECS · | 1 upvote · 316.6K views

    Material Design for Angular Angular 2 Node.js TypeScript Spring-Boot RxJS Microsoft SQL Server Hibernate Spring MVC

    We built our customer facing portal application using Angular frontend backed by Spring boot.

    See more
    MyBatis logo

    MyBatis

    225
    17
    SQL Mapper Framework for Java
    225
    17
    PROS OF MYBATIS
    • 6
      Easy to use
    • 3
      Flexible
    • 3
      Extensions
    • 3
      Integrated with Spring
    • 2
      Data-first support
    CONS OF MYBATIS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related MyBatis posts

      Slick logo

      Slick

      9.2K
      0
      Database query and access library for Scala
      9.2K
      0
      PROS OF SLICK
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF SLICK
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Slick posts

          MySQL logo

          MySQL

          126.5K
          3.8K
          The world's most popular open source database
          126.5K
          3.8K
          PROS OF MYSQL
          • 800
            Sql
          • 679
            Free
          • 562
            Easy
          • 528
            Widely used
          • 490
            Open source
          • 180
            High availability
          • 160
            Cross-platform support
          • 104
            Great community
          • 79
            Secure
          • 75
            Full-text indexing and searching
          • 26
            Fast, open, available
          • 16
            Reliable
          • 16
            SSL support
          • 15
            Robust
          • 9
            Enterprise Version
          • 7
            Easy to set up on all platforms
          • 3
            NoSQL access to JSON data type
          • 1
            Relational database
          • 1
            Easy, light, scalable
          • 1
            Sequel Pro (best SQL GUI)
          • 1
            Replica Support
          CONS OF MYSQL
          • 16
            Owned by a company with their own agenda
          • 3
            Can't roll back schema changes

          related MySQL posts

          Nick Rockwell
          SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 4.3M views

          When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

          So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

          React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

          Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

          See more

          Hello, I am building a website for a school that's used by students to find Zoom meeting links, view their marks, and check course materials. It is also used by the teachers to put the meeting links, students' marks, and course materials.

          I created a similar website using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL. Now I want to implement this project using some frameworks: Next.js, ExpressJS and use PostgreSQL instead of MYSQL

          I want to have some advice on whether these are enough to implement my project.

          See more
          PostgreSQL logo

          PostgreSQL

          99.2K
          3.5K
          A powerful, open source object-relational database system
          99.2K
          3.5K
          PROS OF POSTGRESQL
          • 764
            Relational database
          • 510
            High availability
          • 439
            Enterprise class database
          • 383
            Sql
          • 304
            Sql + nosql
          • 173
            Great community
          • 147
            Easy to setup
          • 131
            Heroku
          • 130
            Secure by default
          • 113
            Postgis
          • 50
            Supports Key-Value
          • 48
            Great JSON support
          • 34
            Cross platform
          • 33
            Extensible
          • 28
            Replication
          • 26
            Triggers
          • 23
            Multiversion concurrency control
          • 23
            Rollback
          • 21
            Open source
          • 18
            Heroku Add-on
          • 17
            Stable, Simple and Good Performance
          • 15
            Powerful
          • 13
            Lets be serious, what other SQL DB would you go for?
          • 11
            Good documentation
          • 9
            Scalable
          • 8
            Free
          • 8
            Reliable
          • 8
            Intelligent optimizer
          • 7
            Transactional DDL
          • 7
            Modern
          • 6
            One stop solution for all things sql no matter the os
          • 5
            Relational database with MVCC
          • 5
            Faster Development
          • 4
            Full-Text Search
          • 4
            Developer friendly
          • 3
            Excellent source code
          • 3
            Free version
          • 3
            Great DB for Transactional system or Application
          • 3
            Relational datanbase
          • 3
            search
          • 3
            Open-source
          • 2
            Text
          • 2
            Full-text
          • 1
            Can handle up to petabytes worth of size
          • 1
            Composability
          • 1
            Multiple procedural languages supported
          • 0
            Native
          CONS OF POSTGRESQL
          • 10
            Table/index bloatings

          related PostgreSQL posts

          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12.1M views

          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
          • Respectively Git as revision control system
          • SourceTree as Git GUI
          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
          • SonarQube as quality gate
          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
          See more

          Hello, I am building a website for a school that's used by students to find Zoom meeting links, view their marks, and check course materials. It is also used by the teachers to put the meeting links, students' marks, and course materials.

          I created a similar website using HTML, CSS, PHP, and MySQL. Now I want to implement this project using some frameworks: Next.js, ExpressJS and use PostgreSQL instead of MYSQL

          I want to have some advice on whether these are enough to implement my project.

          See more
          MongoDB logo

          MongoDB

          94.2K
          4.1K
          The database for giant ideas
          94.2K
          4.1K
          PROS OF MONGODB
          • 829
            Document-oriented storage
          • 594
            No sql
          • 554
            Ease of use
          • 465
            Fast
          • 410
            High performance
          • 255
            Free
          • 218
            Open source
          • 180
            Flexible
          • 145
            Replication & high availability
          • 112
            Easy to maintain
          • 42
            Querying
          • 39
            Easy scalability
          • 38
            Auto-sharding
          • 37
            High availability
          • 31
            Map/reduce
          • 27
            Document database
          • 25
            Easy setup
          • 25
            Full index support
          • 16
            Reliable
          • 15
            Fast in-place updates
          • 14
            Agile programming, flexible, fast
          • 12
            No database migrations
          • 8
            Easy integration with Node.Js
          • 8
            Enterprise
          • 6
            Enterprise Support
          • 5
            Great NoSQL DB
          • 4
            Support for many languages through different drivers
          • 3
            Schemaless
          • 3
            Aggregation Framework
          • 3
            Drivers support is good
          • 2
            Fast
          • 2
            Managed service
          • 2
            Easy to Scale
          • 2
            Awesome
          • 2
            Consistent
          • 1
            Good GUI
          • 1
            Acid Compliant
          CONS OF MONGODB
          • 6
            Very slowly for connected models that require joins
          • 3
            Not acid compliant
          • 2
            Proprietary query language

          related MongoDB posts

          Jeyabalaji Subramanian

          Recently we were looking at a few robust and cost-effective ways of replicating the data that resides in our production MongoDB to a PostgreSQL database for data warehousing and business intelligence.

          We set ourselves the following criteria for the optimal tool that would do this job: - The data replication must be near real-time, yet it should NOT impact the production database - The data replication must be horizontally scalable (based on the load), asynchronous & crash-resilient

          Based on the above criteria, we selected the following tools to perform the end to end data replication:

          We chose MongoDB Stitch for picking up the changes in the source database. It is the serverless platform from MongoDB. One of the services offered by MongoDB Stitch is Stitch Triggers. Using stitch triggers, you can execute a serverless function (in Node.js) in real time in response to changes in the database. When there are a lot of database changes, Stitch automatically "feeds forward" these changes through an asynchronous queue.

          We chose Amazon SQS as the pipe / message backbone for communicating the changes from MongoDB to our own replication service. Interestingly enough, MongoDB stitch offers integration with AWS services.

          In the Node.js function, we wrote minimal functionality to communicate the database changes (insert / update / delete / replace) to Amazon SQS.

          Next we wrote a minimal micro-service in Python to listen to the message events on SQS, pickup the data payload & mirror the DB changes on to the target Data warehouse. We implemented source data to target data translation by modelling target table structures through SQLAlchemy . We deployed this micro-service as AWS Lambda with Zappa. With Zappa, deploying your services as event-driven & horizontally scalable Lambda service is dumb-easy.

          In the end, we got to implement a highly scalable near realtime Change Data Replication service that "works" and deployed to production in a matter of few days!

          See more
          Robert Zuber

          We use MongoDB as our primary #datastore. Mongo's approach to replica sets enables some fantastic patterns for operations like maintenance, backups, and #ETL.

          As we pull #microservices from our #monolith, we are taking the opportunity to build them with their own datastores using PostgreSQL. We also use Redis to cache data we’d never store permanently, and to rate-limit our requests to partners’ APIs (like GitHub).

          When we’re dealing with large blobs of immutable data (logs, artifacts, and test results), we store them in Amazon S3. We handle any side-effects of S3’s eventual consistency model within our own code. This ensures that we deal with user requests correctly while writes are in process.

          See more
          Redis logo

          Redis

          60K
          3.9K
          Open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store
          60K
          3.9K
          PROS OF REDIS
          • 887
            Performance
          • 542
            Super fast
          • 514
            Ease of use
          • 444
            In-memory cache
          • 324
            Advanced key-value cache
          • 194
            Open source
          • 182
            Easy to deploy
          • 165
            Stable
          • 156
            Free
          • 121
            Fast
          • 42
            High-Performance
          • 40
            High Availability
          • 35
            Data Structures
          • 32
            Very Scalable
          • 24
            Replication
          • 23
            Pub/Sub
          • 22
            Great community
          • 19
            "NoSQL" key-value data store
          • 16
            Hashes
          • 13
            Sets
          • 11
            Sorted Sets
          • 10
            Lists
          • 10
            NoSQL
          • 9
            Async replication
          • 9
            BSD licensed
          • 8
            Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background
          • 8
            Bitmaps
          • 7
            Open Source
          • 7
            Keys with a limited time-to-live
          • 6
            Lua scripting
          • 6
            Strings
          • 5
            Awesomeness for Free
          • 5
            Hyperloglogs
          • 4
            Runs server side LUA
          • 4
            Transactions
          • 4
            Networked
          • 4
            Outstanding performance
          • 4
            Feature Rich
          • 4
            Written in ANSI C
          • 4
            LRU eviction of keys
          • 3
            Data structure server
          • 3
            Performance & ease of use
          • 2
            Temporarily kept on disk
          • 2
            Dont save data if no subscribers are found
          • 2
            Automatic failover
          • 2
            Easy to use
          • 2
            Scalable
          • 2
            Channels concept
          • 2
            Object [key/value] size each 500 MB
          • 2
            Existing Laravel Integration
          • 2
            Simple
          CONS OF REDIS
          • 15
            Cannot query objects directly
          • 3
            No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types
          • 1
            No WAL

          related Redis posts

          Russel Werner
          Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 2.9M views

          StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

          Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

          #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

          See more
          Simon Reymann
          Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH · | 30 upvotes · 12.1M views

          Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

          • GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
          • Respectively Git as revision control system
          • SourceTree as Git GUI
          • Visual Studio Code as IDE
          • CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
          • Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
          • SonarQube as quality gate
          • Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
          • VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
          • Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
          • Heroku for deploying in test environments
          • nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
          • SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
          • Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
          • PostgreSQL as preferred database system
          • Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

          The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

          • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
          • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
          • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
          • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
          • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
          • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
          See more