Effector vs ng-state

Overview

Effector

Stacks32

Followers26

Votes23

ng-state

Stacks4

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars14

Forks2

Effector vs ng-state: What are the differences?

State Management Approach: Effector uses a reactive state management approach, where changes to the state trigger reactions in the system, while ng-state follows a more traditional, imperative state management approach.
Accessibility: Effector provides a more fine-grained control over state accessibility and permissions, allowing for more granular management of state changes, whereas ng-state offers a simpler, more straightforward approach to state management.
Performance: Effector is known for its high performance, as it is designed to minimize unnecessary re-renders and optimize state updates, while ng-state may not have the same level of performance optimizations.
Integration with Frameworks: Effector is designed to work well with multiple frameworks and libraries, offering a more versatile state management solution, whereas ng-state is specifically tailored for Angular applications and may not be as easily adaptable to other frameworks.
API Complexity: Effector has a more complex API with a steeper learning curve, but it offers more advanced features and capabilities for state management, whereas ng-state has a simpler API that may be more approachable for beginners but may lack some advanced functionalities.
Community Support: Effector has a growing community of users and contributors who actively maintain and improve the library, providing robust support and resources, while ng-state may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for developers.

In Summary, Effector and ng-state differ in their state management approach, accessibility, performance, integration with frameworks, API complexity, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Effector	ng-state
It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.	RxJS and ImmutableJs powered nested state management for Angular 2+ applications inspired by @ngrx/store. It is simple, fast, reliable with no boilerplate.
Type safe; Framework agnostic; Developer-friendly; Maximum performance; Tiny bundle size; Plain javascript	Developers do not need to remember long nested paths to access stores;Decouples / Hides paths to state from components;Uses Redux like pure functions - actions to interact with state;No boilerplate;It is highly performant because of rxjs and ImmutableJS or Immer;Because of immutable data structure nobody can mutate state;Keeps state manipulation class close to component Actions but separated which reduces boiler plate and enables cleaner unit testing;Uses Redux like messages for communication between not related components Dispatcher;Easy to test Test actions;Has Redux DevTools integration and Time Travel functionality;Can restore state from server Server Side Rendering (SSR)
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 14
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2
Stacks 32	Stacks 4
Followers 26	Followers 11
Votes 23	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Statically typed 7 Less boilerplate 4 Small bundle size 2 Effects calculation 2 Signal functions Cons 2 Undocumented methods like setState 1 Lack of debugging tools	No community feedback yet
Integrations
TypeScript JavaScript Flow (JS)	AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Effector, ng-state?

Redux

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Zustand

Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.

redux-saga

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

vuex

Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.

redux-thunk

Redux Thunk middleware allows you to write action creators that return a function instead of an action. The thunk can be used to delay the dispatch of an action, or to dispatch only if a certain condition is met. The inner function receives the store methods dispatch and getState as parameters.

Unstated

State so simple, it goes without saying

reselect

Simple “selector” library for Redux (and others) inspired by getters in NuclearJS, subscriptions in re-frame and this proposal from speedskater.

Redux Observable

It allows developers to dispatch a function that returns an observable, promise or iterable of action(s). Compose and cancel async actions to create side effects and more.

Recoiljs

It is an experimental state management library for React apps. It provides several capabilities that are difficult to achieve with React alone, while being compatible with the newest features of React.

Related Comparisons

Effector vs ng-state: What are the differences?

State Management Approach: Effector uses a reactive state management approach, where changes to the state trigger reactions in the system, while ng-state follows a more traditional, imperative state management approach.
Accessibility: Effector provides a more fine-grained control over state accessibility and permissions, allowing for more granular management of state changes, whereas ng-state offers a simpler, more straightforward approach to state management.
Performance: Effector is known for its high performance, as it is designed to minimize unnecessary re-renders and optimize state updates, while ng-state may not have the same level of performance optimizations.
Integration with Frameworks: Effector is designed to work well with multiple frameworks and libraries, offering a more versatile state management solution, whereas ng-state is specifically tailored for Angular applications and may not be as easily adaptable to other frameworks.
API Complexity: Effector has a more complex API with a steeper learning curve, but it offers more advanced features and capabilities for state management, whereas ng-state has a simpler API that may be more approachable for beginners but may lack some advanced functionalities.
Community Support: Effector has a growing community of users and contributors who actively maintain and improve the library, providing robust support and resources, while ng-state may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for developers.

In Summary, Effector and ng-state differ in their state management approach, accessibility, performance, integration with frameworks, API complexity, and community support.

Effector vs ng-state

Overview