Effector vs vuex

Overview

vuex

Stacks1.7K

Followers926

Votes7

GitHub Stars28.4K

Forks9.6K

Effector

Stacks32

Followers26

Votes23

Effector vs vuex: What are the differences?

State Handling Approach: Effector uses a more functional and reactive approach to handle state management, while Vuex follows a more traditional and centralized approach with actions, mutations, and state.
Performance Optimization: Effector is built with a focus on runtime performance optimization to minimize unnecessary re-computations and updates, whereas Vuex may have performance limitations in complex applications due to its reactivity system.
Type Safety: Effector offers built-in support for type safety and static type checking with TypeScript, ensuring more robust and error-free code, whereas Vuex may require additional configuration and plugins for achieving similar levels of type safety.
Developer Experience: Effector provides a more intuitive and developer-friendly API for creating and managing state, effects, and events, compared to Vuex which may have a steeper learning curve and boilerplate code.
Integration with Frameworks: Effector is framework-agnostic and can be easily integrated into various front-end frameworks, while Vuex is specifically designed for Vue.js applications, limiting its usability in projects using different frameworks.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Vuex has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, support, and ecosystem of plugins and tools, whereas Effector, being a newer library, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.

In Summary, Effector and Vuex differ in their state handling approach, performance optimization, type safety, developer experience, integration with frameworks, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

vuex	Effector
Vuex is a state management pattern + library for Vue.js applications. It serves as a centralized store for all the components in an application, with rules ensuring that the state can only be mutated in a predictable fashion. It also integrates with Vue's official devtools extension to provide advanced features such as zero-config time-travel debugging and state snapshot export / import.	It is an effective multi-store state manager for Javascript apps, that allows you to manage data in complex applications.
-	Type safe; Framework agnostic; Developer-friendly; Maximum performance; Tiny bundle size; Plain javascript
Statistics
GitHub Stars 28.4K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.6K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.7K	Stacks 32
Followers 926	Followers 26
Votes 7	Votes 23
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Debugging 2 Zero-config time-travel 2 Centralized State Management 1 Easy to setup	Pros 8 Statically typed 7 Less boilerplate 4 Small bundle size 2 Effects calculation 2 Signal functions Cons 2 Undocumented methods like setState 1 Lack of debugging tools
Integrations
Vue.js	TypeScript JavaScript Flow (JS)

What are some alternatives to vuex, Effector?

Redux

It helps you write applications that behave consistently, run in different environments (client, server, and native), and are easy to test. t provides a great experience, such as live code editing combined with a time traveling debugger.

MobX

MobX is a battle tested library that makes state management simple and scalable by transparently applying functional reactive programming (TFRP). React and MobX together are a powerful combination. React renders the application state by providing mechanisms to translate it into a tree of renderable components. MobX provides the mechanism to store and update the application state that React then uses.

Zustand

Small, fast and scaleable bearbones state-management solution. Has a comfy api based on hooks, that isn't boilerplatey or opinionated, but still just enough to be explicit and flux-like.

redux-saga

An alternative side effect model for Redux apps

redux-thunk

Redux Thunk middleware allows you to write action creators that return a function instead of an action. The thunk can be used to delay the dispatch of an action, or to dispatch only if a certain condition is met. The inner function receives the store methods dispatch and getState as parameters.

Unstated

State so simple, it goes without saying

reselect

Simple “selector” library for Redux (and others) inspired by getters in NuclearJS, subscriptions in re-frame and this proposal from speedskater.

Redux Observable

It allows developers to dispatch a function that returns an observable, promise or iterable of action(s). Compose and cancel async actions to create side effects and more.

Recoiljs

It is an experimental state management library for React apps. It provides several capabilities that are difficult to achieve with React alone, while being compatible with the newest features of React.

XState

It is a library for creating, interpreting, and executing finite state machines and statecharts. It's a really powerful package that can be used to manage state in React Apps.

Related Comparisons

Effector vs vuex: What are the differences?

State Handling Approach: Effector uses a more functional and reactive approach to handle state management, while Vuex follows a more traditional and centralized approach with actions, mutations, and state.
Performance Optimization: Effector is built with a focus on runtime performance optimization to minimize unnecessary re-computations and updates, whereas Vuex may have performance limitations in complex applications due to its reactivity system.
Type Safety: Effector offers built-in support for type safety and static type checking with TypeScript, ensuring more robust and error-free code, whereas Vuex may require additional configuration and plugins for achieving similar levels of type safety.
Developer Experience: Effector provides a more intuitive and developer-friendly API for creating and managing state, effects, and events, compared to Vuex which may have a steeper learning curve and boilerplate code.
Integration with Frameworks: Effector is framework-agnostic and can be easily integrated into various front-end frameworks, while Vuex is specifically designed for Vue.js applications, limiting its usability in projects using different frameworks.
Community Support and Ecosystem: Vuex has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, support, and ecosystem of plugins and tools, whereas Effector, being a newer library, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available.

In Summary, Effector and Vuex differ in their state handling approach, performance optimization, type safety, developer experience, integration with frameworks, and community support.

Effector vs vuex

Overview