Overview

Electron.NET

Stacks18

Followers86

Votes1

GitHub Stars7.5K

Forks736

Electron Toolkit

Stacks7

Followers92

Votes0

GitHub Stars806

Forks35

Electron Toolkit vs Electron.NET: What are the differences?

## Introduction
When it comes to developing applications using Electron, two popular frameworks are Electron Toolkit and Electron.NET. Both frameworks provide unique features and capabilities suited for different use cases.

1. **Programming Language**: Electron Toolkit is primarily used with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, making it a great choice for web developers. On the other hand, Electron.NET allows developers to build apps using C# and .NET, making it ideal for those who are proficient in these languages.
   
2. **Cross-Platform Support**: Electron Toolkit offers robust cross-platform compatibility, allowing developers to create applications for Windows, macOS, and Linux seamlessly. Electron.NET, in contrast, focuses more on Windows development, offering better integration with Windows-specific features.
   
3. **Performance**: Electron Toolkit may have slightly better performance due to its use of native web technologies. Electron.NET, being based on .NET, may experience a slightly higher performance overhead, especially when dealing with resource-intensive operations.
   
4. **Community Support**: Electron Toolkit has a larger community base as it has been around for a longer time and is widely used for web applications. On the other hand, Electron.NET is gaining traction but may have a smaller community, which could impact the availability of resources and support.
   
5. **Packaging and Distribution**: Electron Toolkit provides more flexibility in packaging and distributing applications, with various options available to developers. Electron.NET streamlines the process by leveraging .NET tools and conventions, simplifying the packaging and distribution steps.
   
6. **Ease of Integration**: Electron Toolkit seamlessly integrates with existing web technologies and frameworks, offering a familiar development environment for web developers. Electron.NET, on the other hand, may require a learning curve for developers new to .NET, but it provides a straightforward integration path for those already familiar with the ecosystem.

In Summary, Electron Toolkit and Electron.NET cater to different developer preferences and project requirements, offering distinct advantages in terms of programming languages, platform support, performance, community, packaging, and integration ease.

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Node.js Frameworks

A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

566

165k

Detailed Comparison

Electron.NET	Electron Toolkit
Electron.NET is a wrapper around a "normal" Electron application with a embedded ASP.NET Core application. Via our Electron.NET IPC bridge we can invoke Electron APIs from .NET. The CLI extensions hosts our toolset to build and start Electron.NET applications.	GUI for Electron - package and built your app.
-	GUI for Electron; App icon generator; Screen capturer; Website builder
Statistics
GitHub Stars 7.5K	GitHub Stars 806
GitHub Forks 736	GitHub Forks 35
Stacks 18	Stacks 7
Followers 86	Followers 92
Votes 1	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Muy pesado Cons 1 Gran consumo ram	No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET Electron	Electron

What are some alternatives to Electron.NET, Electron Toolkit?

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.