Evergreen vs styled-components: What are the differences?
Comparison between Evergreen and styled-components
Evergreen and styled-components are two popular libraries used for styling components in web development. While they both aim to simplify the process of styling components, there are some key differences between them.
1. Theming support: Evergreen provides built-in theming support, allowing developers to easily create and modify themes for their applications. This makes it convenient for maintaining a consistent visual style throughout the entire project. On the other hand, styled-components does not have built-in theming support, but it can be integrated with external libraries for theming purposes.
2. Styling approach: Evergreen uses a more traditional approach to styling components. It provides a set of predefined CSS classes that can be applied to components, allowing developers to style them by applying these classes. styled-components, on the other hand, uses a CSS-in-JS approach where styles are defined directly in JavaScript code. This approach offers more flexibility and modularity, as styles can be easily composed and customized.
3. Component scoping: styled-components automatically generates unique class names for each component, ensuring that styles are properly scoped and do not interfere with each other. This makes it easier to build reusable and composable components without worrying about CSS class collisions. Evergreen, on the other hand, does not provide automatic scoping of styles. Developers need to take care of scoping styles themselves to prevent conflicts.
4. Performance: styled-components provides better performance by automatically generating CSS classes based on the defined styles and caching them for reuse. This reduces the amount of CSS generated and improves rendering performance. Evergreen, on the other hand, relies on predefined CSS classes, which can lead to larger bundle sizes and potentially slower performance.
5. Integration with CSS libraries: Evergreen is designed to work seamlessly with CSS libraries like Tachyons and CSS Modules, allowing developers to leverage the benefits of these libraries in their projects. styled-components, on the other hand, is a standalone library that does not rely on any external CSS libraries.
6. Community and ecosystem: styled-components has a larger community and ecosystem compared to Evergreen. It is widely adopted and has a rich ecosystem of third-party tools and libraries that can be used alongside it. Evergreen, although popular, does not have as large of a community or ecosystem as styled-components.
In summary, Evergreen provides built-in theming support, uses a traditional styling approach, requires manual scoping of styles, may have larger bundle sizes, and works well with CSS libraries. On the other hand, styled-components offers more flexibility in styling, automatic scoping of styles, better performance, and a larger community and ecosystem.
