StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Expo vs ViroReact

Expo vs ViroReact

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Expo
Expo
Stacks811
Followers693
Votes66
ViroReact
ViroReact
Stacks3
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars194
Forks74

Expo vs ViroReact: What are the differences?

  1. Rendering Performance: Expo uses React Native to achieve good rendering performance, while ViroReact utilizes its own rendering engine for a more optimized performance tailored for AR/VR applications. This difference can result in smoother and more responsive user experiences in ViroReact compared to Expo.
  2. Feature Set: Expo primarily focuses on providing a comprehensive set of tools and libraries for building cross-platform mobile applications with a strong emphasis on simplicity and ease of use. In contrast, ViroReact is specifically designed for creating AR/VR applications, offering a specialized feature set tailored to immersive experiences like 3D object rendering and spatial interactions.
  3. Community and Support: Expo has a large and active community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, providing a wealth of resources, tutorials, and support. On the other hand, ViroReact, being a more niche platform, may have a smaller community but offers targeted support for AR/VR development, including expert guidance on immersive technologies.
  4. Platform Compatibility: Expo enables developers to build applications that run smoothly on both iOS and Android devices with minimal platform-specific adjustments. In contrast, ViroReact is more focused on delivering immersive experiences specifically tailored for ARKit and ARCore platforms, allowing developers to leverage the unique capabilities of these technologies.
  5. Ease of Integration: Expo offers a seamless integration with various third-party services and libraries, simplifying the development process by providing pre-configured tools and APIs. ViroReact, being more specialized, may require additional setup and customization for integrating specific AR/VR functionalities, potentially offering greater flexibility but requiring more technical expertise.
  6. Scalability and Customization: Expo provides a high level of abstraction and predefined components, making it easy to quickly build and deploy applications but limiting the level of customization and scalability. In contrast, ViroReact offers more control over the development process, allowing for deep customization and scalability of AR/VR applications but potentially requiring more effort and expertise to achieve advanced functionalities.

In Summary, Expo and ViroReact differ in rendering performance, feature set, community support, platform compatibility, ease of integration, and scalability/customization, catering to different needs in mobile and AR/VR development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Expo, ViroReact

Furqan
Furqan

Jul 16, 2020

Needs adviceonReact NativeReact Native

Hello guys, I am new here. So, if I posted without specific guidelines, please ignore.

Basically, I am an iOS developer and developing native apps for the last three years. Recently, I started learning React Native to develop apps for both platforms. If anyone out there knows any useful resources that will become a better react native developer.

@{#newbie}|topic:null|

325k views325k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Expo
Expo
ViroReact
ViroReact

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

It is an open source developer platform for rapidly building AR/VR applications using React Native. Use a single code base for your AR and VR apps.

-
Open source; React Native compatible; High performance 3D engine
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
194
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
74
Stacks
811
Stacks
3
Followers
693
Followers
10
Votes
66
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 15
    Free
  • 13
    Hot Reload
  • 9
    Easy to learn
  • 9
    Common ios and android app setup
  • 6
    Streamlined
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React Native
React Native
React Native
React Native
Android OS
Android OS
iOS
iOS

What are some alternatives to Expo, ViroReact?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Qt

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Vue Native

Vue Native

Vue Native is a mobile framework to build truly native mobile app using Vue.js. Its is designed to connect React Native and Vue.js. Vue Native is a wrapper around React Native APIs, which allows you to use Vue.js and compose rich mobile User Interface.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase