Fielder vs Lodash

Overview

Lodash

Stacks10.7K

Followers886

Votes3

GitHub Stars61.3K

Forks7.1K

Fielder

Stacks1

Followers3

Votes0

GitHub Stars192

Forks10

Lodash vs Fielder: What are the differences?

Lodash: A JavaScript utility library. A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm; Fielder: A field-first form library for React and React Native. Fielder has been built from the ground up with a field-first approach to validation What does this mean?

Validation can easily be added and removed to a form
Only validate what the user can see (see cross form validation below)
No need for a large set of upfront domain knowledge.

Lodash and Fielder are primarily classified as "Javascript Utilities & Libraries" and "Javascript UI Libraries" tools respectively.

Lodash is an open source tool with 45.4K GitHub stars and 5.02K GitHub forks. Here's a link to Lodash's open source repository on GitHub.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Lodash, Fielder

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash	Fielder
A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.	Fielder has been built from the ground up with a field-first approach to validation. What does this mean? - Validation can easily be added and removed to a form - Only validate what the user can see (see cross form validation below) - No need for a large set of upfront domain knowledge
-	Validation can easily be added and removed to a form; Only validate what the user can see (see cross form validation below); No need for a large set of upfront domain knowledge
Statistics
GitHub Stars 61.3K	GitHub Stars 192
GitHub Forks 7.1K	GitHub Forks 10
Stacks 10.7K	Stacks 1
Followers 886	Followers 3
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Better than Underscore 1 Simple 0 Better that Underscore Cons 1 It reduce the performance	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	React React Native

What are some alternatives to Lodash, Fielder?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.