Overview

Flight

Stacks15

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars6.5K

Forks542

Vue.js

Stacks55.5K

Followers44.7K

Votes1.6K

GitHub Stars209.7K

Forks33.8K

Flight vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Data Binding: In Vue.js, data binding is automatic and bi-directional, meaning changes in the model are reflected in the view and vice versa. However, in Flight, data binding needs to be implemented manually, making the process more explicit and controlled.
Component Architecture: Vue.js comes with a built-in component system, making it easier to create reusable and maintainable components. On the other hand, Flight does not have a built-in component architecture, requiring developers to structure their code accordingly.
Community Support: Vue.js has a larger and more active community compared to Flight, which results in more resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers. This community support can significantly impact the learning curve and development speed of a project.
Virtual DOM: Vue.js uses a virtual DOM to efficiently update and render the UI based on data changes, resulting in better performance. In contrast, Flight does not use a virtual DOM, potentially impacting the performance when dealing with complex user interfaces.
Template Syntax: Vue.js uses HTML-based template syntax which is familiar to most developers, making it easier to learn and use. While Flight also uses a template system, it is more unique and may require additional time for developers to master.
JavaScript Library vs Framework: Flight is a lightweight JavaScript library focused on providing utilities and structure for writing web applications, while Vue.js is a full-featured framework with built-in tools for routing, state management, and more. This distinction impacts the level of abstraction and decision-making required by developers.

In Summary, Vue.js offers automatic data binding, a built-in component system, strong community support, virtual DOM for performance, familiar template syntax, and is a full-featured framework, while Flight requires manual data binding, lacks a built-in component architecture, has a smaller community, does not use a virtual DOM, has a unique template syntax, and is a lightweight library.

🔥 Trending in UI Components on StackShare

React UI Components

A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

399

147k

Advice on Flight, Vue.js

Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceon

Vue.js

React

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k

Comments

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

Decidedon

Vuetify

Vue.js

Nuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

@{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
@{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
@{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
@{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
@{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
@{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
@{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
@{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.

5.13M views5.13M

Comments

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

It was easier to find people who've worked on React than Vue. Angular did not have this problem, but seemed way too bloated compared to React. Angular also brings in restrictions working within their MVC framework. React on the other hand only handles the view/rendering part and rest of the control is left to the developers. React has a very active community, support and has lots of ready-to-use plugins/libraries available.

683k views683k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flight	Vue.js
Flight is distinct from existing frameworks in that it doesn't prescribe or provide any particular approach to rendering or providing data to a web application. It's agnostic to how requests are routed, which templating language you use or even if you render your HTML on the client or the server. While some web frameworks encourage developers to arrange their code around a prescribed model layer, Flight is organized around the existing DOM model with functionality mapped directly to DOM nodes.	It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
-	Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars 6.5K	GitHub Stars 209.7K
GitHub Forks 542	GitHub Forks 33.8K
Stacks 15	Stacks 55.5K
Followers 19	Followers 44.7K
Votes 0	Votes 1.6K
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 294 Simple and easy to start with 230 Good documentation 196 Components 131 Simple the best 100 Simplified AngularJS Cons 9 Less Common Place 5 YXMLvsHTML Markup 3 Only support programatically multiple root nodes 3 Don't support fragments

What are some alternatives to Flight, Vue.js?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.