Gin Gonic vs Play

Overview

Play

Stacks752

Followers609

Votes496

GitHub Stars12.6K

Forks4.1K

Gin Gonic

Stacks393

Followers340

Votes16

GitHub Stars86.8K

Forks8.5K

Gin Gonic vs Play: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key Differences between Gin Gonic and Play

1. **Programming Language**: Gin Gonic is written in Go language, while Play is written in Java.
2. **Concurrency Model**: Gin Gonic is designed to take advantage of Go's powerful concurrency model, making it highly efficient for handling multiple requests simultaneously. In contrast, Play uses traditional Java concurrency options.
3. **Performance**: Gin Gonic is known for its lightweight and fast routing capabilities, making it a preferred choice for high-performance web applications. Play, on the other hand, is more feature-rich and may have slightly lower performance due to the overhead of the JVM.
4. **Community Support**: Gin Gonic has a growing community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, with a focus on simplicity and performance. Play, being a part of the larger Java ecosystem, has strong community support and a wide range of libraries and tools available.
5. **Learning Curve**: Due to its simplicity and minimalist design, Gin Gonic is known for having a relatively lower learning curve compared to Play, which offers a more comprehensive framework with a steeper learning curve.
6. **Project Structure**: Gin Gonic promotes a more flexible and adaptable project structure, allowing developers to customize their applications according to their specific needs. Play, being a more opinionated framework, follows a standardized project structure that may not be as customizable.

In Summary, Gin Gonic and Play differ in terms of programming language, concurrency model, performance, community support, learning curve, and project structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Play	Gin Gonic
Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.	It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 12.6K	GitHub Stars 86.8K
GitHub Forks 4.1K	GitHub Forks 8.5K
Stacks 752	Stacks 393
Followers 609	Followers 340
Votes 496	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 81 Scala 55 Web-friendly architecture 55 Built on akka 50 Stateless 47 High-scalable Cons 3 Evolves fast, keep up with releases 1 Unnecessarily complicated	Pros 11 Hight performance 5 Open source Cons 2 Low performance 1 No wildcard routing

What are some alternatives to Play, Gin Gonic?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Gin Gonic vs Play: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Key Differences between Gin Gonic and Play

1. **Programming Language**: Gin Gonic is written in Go language, while Play is written in Java.
2. **Concurrency Model**: Gin Gonic is designed to take advantage of Go's powerful concurrency model, making it highly efficient for handling multiple requests simultaneously. In contrast, Play uses traditional Java concurrency options.
3. **Performance**: Gin Gonic is known for its lightweight and fast routing capabilities, making it a preferred choice for high-performance web applications. Play, on the other hand, is more feature-rich and may have slightly lower performance due to the overhead of the JVM.
4. **Community Support**: Gin Gonic has a growing community of developers contributing to its ecosystem, with a focus on simplicity and performance. Play, being a part of the larger Java ecosystem, has strong community support and a wide range of libraries and tools available.
5. **Learning Curve**: Due to its simplicity and minimalist design, Gin Gonic is known for having a relatively lower learning curve compared to Play, which offers a more comprehensive framework with a steeper learning curve.
6. **Project Structure**: Gin Gonic promotes a more flexible and adaptable project structure, allowing developers to customize their applications according to their specific needs. Play, being a more opinionated framework, follows a standardized project structure that may not be as customizable.

In Summary, Gin Gonic and Play differ in terms of programming language, concurrency model, performance, community support, learning curve, and project structure.

Gin Gonic vs Play

Overview