Gin Gonic vs Tornado

Overview

Tornado

Stacks530

Followers409

Votes167

GitHub Stars22.3K

Forks5.5K

Gin Gonic

Stacks393

Followers340

Votes16

GitHub Stars86.8K

Forks8.5K

Gin Gonic vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Gin Gonic is written in Go (Golang), while Tornado is written in Python. This fundamental difference in programming languages can influence the speed, ease of development, and compatibility with other systems.
Asynchronous Nature: Tornado is inherently designed to be asynchronous, utilizing a single-threaded event loop, making it more suitable for handling long-lived connections and high concurrency. In contrast, Gin Gonic is not asynchronous by default, which means it may require additional configurations or libraries to achieve similar performance.
Framework Size: Gin Gonic is known for its minimalist approach, providing essential features for building web applications without unnecessary complexity. On the other hand, Tornado comes with a more extensive set of tools and functionalities out of the box, offering a broader range of capabilities but potentially requiring more overhead.
Community Support: The Go community around Gin Gonic tends to focus on simplicity, performance, and efficiency, reflecting the language's design principles. In comparison, Tornado's community, driven by Python's versatility and widespread adoption, offers a diverse range of libraries, plugins, and resources to extend the framework's capabilities.
Deployment and Scaling: Due to its Go origins, Gin Gonic is often favored for deployment in containerized environments like Docker and Kubernetes, leveraging its small footprint and efficient resource utilization. Tornado, being Python-based, can face challenges related to scaling in certain scenarios where performance and resource efficiency are critical.
Documentation: Gin Gonic has well-structured and concise documentation, catering to developers looking for clear explanations and examples to get started quickly with the framework. Conversely, Tornado's documentation may offer a more extensive coverage of features and functionalities due to its broader scope and complexity.

In Summary, Gin Gonic and Tornado differ in programming language, asynchronous nature, framework size, community support, deployment compatibility, and documentation depth.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tornado	Gin Gonic
By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.	It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 22.3K	GitHub Stars 86.8K
GitHub Forks 5.5K	GitHub Forks 8.5K
Stacks 530	Stacks 393
Followers 409	Followers 340
Votes 167	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 37 Open source 31 So fast 27 Great for microservices architecture 20 Websockets 17 Simple Cons 2 Event loop is complicated	Pros 11 Hight performance 5 Open source Cons 2 Low performance 1 No wildcard routing
Integrations
Python	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Tornado, Gin Gonic?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Gin Gonic vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Programming Language: Gin Gonic is written in Go (Golang), while Tornado is written in Python. This fundamental difference in programming languages can influence the speed, ease of development, and compatibility with other systems.
Asynchronous Nature: Tornado is inherently designed to be asynchronous, utilizing a single-threaded event loop, making it more suitable for handling long-lived connections and high concurrency. In contrast, Gin Gonic is not asynchronous by default, which means it may require additional configurations or libraries to achieve similar performance.
Framework Size: Gin Gonic is known for its minimalist approach, providing essential features for building web applications without unnecessary complexity. On the other hand, Tornado comes with a more extensive set of tools and functionalities out of the box, offering a broader range of capabilities but potentially requiring more overhead.
Community Support: The Go community around Gin Gonic tends to focus on simplicity, performance, and efficiency, reflecting the language's design principles. In comparison, Tornado's community, driven by Python's versatility and widespread adoption, offers a diverse range of libraries, plugins, and resources to extend the framework's capabilities.
Deployment and Scaling: Due to its Go origins, Gin Gonic is often favored for deployment in containerized environments like Docker and Kubernetes, leveraging its small footprint and efficient resource utilization. Tornado, being Python-based, can face challenges related to scaling in certain scenarios where performance and resource efficiency are critical.
Documentation: Gin Gonic has well-structured and concise documentation, catering to developers looking for clear explanations and examples to get started quickly with the framework. Conversely, Tornado's documentation may offer a more extensive coverage of features and functionalities due to its broader scope and complexity.

In Summary, Gin Gonic and Tornado differ in programming language, asynchronous nature, framework size, community support, deployment compatibility, and documentation depth.

Gin Gonic vs Tornado

Overview