StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Collaboration
  4. Tools For Github
  5. GitHub Polls vs LGTM

GitHub Polls vs LGTM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

LGTM
LGTM
Stacks11
Followers26
Votes0
GitHub Stars989
Forks125
GitHub Polls
GitHub Polls
Stacks26
Followers36
Votes0

GitHub Polls vs LGTM: What are the differences?

Introduction

GitHub Polls and LGTM are two different platforms used for different purposes within the realm of software development collaboration and code review. Here are the key differences between GitHub Polls and LGTM:

1. Scalability:

GitHub Polls are limited in scalability as they are mainly used for simple voting on specific issues or topics within a GitHub repository. On the other hand, LGTM (Looks Good To Me) is a code reviewing tool that allows developers to comment, approve, or suggest changes on individual lines of code, making it more scalable for detailed code review processes.

2. Integration:

GitHub Polls are specifically integrated within the GitHub platform, making it easy for users to create and participate in polls directly within a GitHub repository. LGTM, on the other hand, can be integrated with various version control systems such as Git, allowing for code review processes across different platforms and repositories.

3. Collaboration:

While GitHub Polls primarily focus on gathering feedback through simple voting mechanisms, LGTM is designed for collaborative code review processes. LGTM enables developers to leave detailed comments, suggest changes, and approve or reject code changes, fostering a more interactive and collaborative environment for code review.

4. Automation:

LGTM offers more automation features compared to GitHub Polls. With LGTM, developers can set up rules and configurations to automatically trigger code review processes based on certain criteria, streamlining the review process and ensuring consistent code quality standards across projects.

5. Granularity:

GitHub Polls provide a basic level of interaction and feedback through simple voting mechanisms, making it suitable for quick decision-making on issues or topics. In contrast, LGTM offers a more granular approach to code review, allowing reviewers to provide feedback on specific lines of code, facilitating more detailed and thorough review processes.

6. Focus:

GitHub Polls are primarily aimed at gathering feedback or making simple decisions within a GitHub repository. In contrast, LGTM focuses on the code review process, providing tools and features to facilitate in-depth analysis, constructive feedback, and approval workflows for code changes.

In Summary, GitHub Polls and LGTM differ in scalability, integration, collaboration, automation, granularity, and focus within the context of software development collaboration and code review.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

LGTM
LGTM
GitHub Polls
GitHub Polls

LGTM is a simple pull request approval system using GitHub protected branches and maintainers files. Pull requests are locked and cannot be merged until the minimum number of approvals are received. Project maintainers can indicate their approval by commenting on the pull request and including LGTM (looks good to me) in their approval text.

These polls work by pasting individual markdown SVG images into your issue, each wrapped with a link that tracks a vote. A single vote per IP is allowed for a given poll, which are stored in DynamoDB.

Unparalleled security analysis; Automated code review; Free for open source; Deep semantic code search
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
989
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
125
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
11
Stacks
26
Followers
26
Followers
36
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to LGTM, GitHub Polls?

Remergr.io

Remergr.io

Keep your pull requests automatically up-to-date and resolve your pull requests' conflicts directly from GitHub's UI. Save hundreds of hours you spend resolving conflicts by keeping always your pull requests automatically up-to-date to reduce the chance of conflicts. If conflicts are found, you can straightforwardly resolve them on GitHub's UI with a click of a button.

Astral

Astral

Astral pulls down all of your starred repositories on GitHub and allows you to organize them using one or more tags.

TravisBuddy

TravisBuddy

TravisBuddy is a cloud service that creates comments in failed pull requests and tell the author what went wrong and what they can do to fix it.

Insight.io for Github

Insight.io for Github

Improve GitHub code browsing experience by decorating file page with x-ref. Insight.io understands the semantics of a lot of Java, Scala, C++/C, Ruby, Python, PHP repositories at github.

Octokit

Octokit

It is a client library targeting .NET 4.5 and above that provides an easy way to interact with the GitHub API.

Release

Release

When run, this command line interface automatically generates a new GitHub Release and populates it with the changes (commits) made since the last release.

GitHub Desktop

GitHub Desktop

It is an open-source multi-platform GUI Git client designed for working with GitHub repositories. Focus on what matters instead of fighting with Git. Whether you're new to Git or a seasoned user, it simplifies your development workflow.

GitHub CLI

GitHub CLI

It is a free and open-source command-line for GitHub. It provides GitHub's graphical features like pull requests, issues, releases, etc. into a terminal. So, anyone can perform the whole GitHub operation from a terminal or with a script.

Datree

Datree

Prevent Kubernetes misconfigurations from reaching production with Datree’s automated policy checks for your pipeline. The open-source CLI tool empowers engineers to write more stable configurations, so they can actually sleep at night.

Octotree

Octotree

Browser extensions (Chrome, Firefox, Safari and Opera) to display GitHub code in tree format. Useful for developers who frequently read source in GitHub and do not want to download or checkout too many repositories.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana