StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cloud Storage
  5. Google Cloud Storage vs Minio

Google Cloud Storage vs Minio

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes75
Minio
Minio
Stacks637
Followers670
Votes43
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks6.4K

Google Cloud Storage vs Minio: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Google Cloud Storage and Minio. Both Google Cloud Storage and Minio are cloud storage solutions, but they have some distinctive features and functionalities that set them apart. Below are the key differences between the two:

  1. Scalability and Global Availability: Google Cloud Storage is a fully managed, highly scalable, and globally available object storage service provided by Google Cloud Platform. It offers high durability and availability, allowing users to store and retrieve their data securely from anywhere around the world. On the other hand, Minio is an open-source, self-hosted object storage server. It provides scalable storage for unstructured data and can be deployed on-premises, in the cloud, or in a hybrid infrastructure. Minio's scalability and availability depend on the infrastructure it is deployed on and the configurations set by the user.

  2. Pricing: Google Cloud Storage follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are billed based on the amount of data stored, data egress, and various other factors. It provides multiple storage classes with different pricing tiers based on the access frequency and storage duration. On the contrary, Minio is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective solution for organizations that prefer to host their own storage infrastructure without incurring additional costs.

  3. Integration and Ecosystem: Google Cloud Storage integrates seamlessly with other Google Cloud Platform services, providing a wide range of capabilities for data management, analytics, machine learning, and more. It has extensive APIs, SDKs, and client libraries that enable developers to leverage its features in their applications. Minio, being an open-source solution, offers integration options with various third-party tools, libraries, and platforms. It supports the Amazon S3 API, making it compatible with a wide range of S3-compatible applications and services.

  4. Security and Compliance: Google Cloud Storage implements robust security measures to protect data at rest and in transit. It provides encryption at rest by default and offers options for customer-managed or Google-managed encryption keys. Google Cloud Storage is compliant with various industry standards and regulations, such as HIPAA, GDPR, and ISO 27001. Minio also supports data encryption at rest and in transit, but the responsibility for managing the encryption keys lies with the user or organization. It provides integrations with external key management systems for enhanced security.

  5. Data Transfer and Transfer Acceleration: Google Cloud Storage offers various options for transferring data to and from the storage, including gsutil command-line tool, Cloud Storage Transfer Service, and Storage Transfer Service for on-premises data. It also provides Transfer Appliance for large-scale offline data transfers. Minio supports data transfer through standard protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, and BitTorrent. While it doesn't provide native offline data transfer solutions like Google Cloud Storage, users can leverage third-party tools or services for transferring large volumes of data to and from Minio.

  6. Managed Services vs Self-Hosted: Google Cloud Storage is a fully managed service that abstracts the underlying infrastructure and provides automatic scalability, replication, and management of storage resources. This relieves users from the burden of infrastructure management but comes with a higher cost compared to self-hosted solutions like Minio. Minio, being self-hosted, gives users more control over their storage infrastructure, allowing customization and flexibility in deployments. However, it requires additional effort and expertise to manage and maintain the infrastructure effectively.

In Summary, Google Cloud Storage is a managed, scalable, and globally available cloud storage service with strong integration and security features, while Minio is an open-source, self-hosted object storage solution with a flexible deployment model and cost advantages for organizations that prefer to manage their own storage infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Google Cloud Storage, Minio

Dalton
Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k
Comments
Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 18, 2020

Decided

We choose Backblaze B2 because it makes more sense for storing static assets.

We admire Backblaze's customer service & transparency, plus, we trust them to maintain fair business practices - including not raising prices in the future.

Lower storage costs means we can keep more data for longer, and lower bandwidth means cache misses don't cost a ton.

120k views120k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage
Minio
Minio

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

High Capacity and Scalability;Strong Data Consistency;Google Developers Console Projects;Bucket Locations;REST APIS;OAuth 2.0 Authentication;Authenticated Browser Downloads;Google Account Support for Sharing
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.4K
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
637
Followers
1.2K
Followers
670
Votes
75
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 28
    Scalable
  • 19
    Cheap
  • 14
    Reliable
  • 9
    Easy
  • 3
    Chealp
Pros
  • 10
    Store and Serve Resumes & Job Description PDF, Backups
  • 8
    S3 Compatible
  • 4
    Open Source
  • 4
    Simple
  • 3
    Lambda Compute
Cons
  • 3
    Deletion of huge buckets is not possible
Integrations
No integrations available
Amazon S3
Amazon S3

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud Storage, Minio?

Amazon S3

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase