Google Container Registry vs Quay.io

Overview

Quay.io

Stacks64

Followers86

Votes7

Google Container Registry

Stacks52

Followers19

Votes0

Google Container Registry vs Quay.io: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Google Container Registry and Quay.io.

Ownership and Provider: Google Container Registry is provided by Google Cloud Platform, while Quay.io is a product of Red Hat, which offers support for private and public repositories with flexibility in deployment options.
Pricing Structure: Google Container Registry has a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on storage and data egress, whereas Quay.io offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users and storage capacity, which includes a free tier for open-source projects.
Integration with Third-Party Tools: Google Container Registry integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud services like Kubernetes Engine, Cloud Build, and Cloud Run, while Quay.io provides integrations with various platforms such as Jenkins, GitHub, and Bitbucket.
Authentication and Security Features: Google Container Registry uses Google Cloud IAM for access control and provides VPC Service Controls for additional security, while Quay.io offers features like Webhooks, Robot Accounts, and Single Sign-On for authentication and security.
Region Availability: Google Container Registry is available in multiple regions worldwide, allowing users to choose the location closest to their deployment, whereas Quay.io offers global availability but limits the storage location to the United States only.
Customization and Extensibility: Quay.io allows users to customize and extend functionalities through plugins and custom scripts, providing more flexibility in workflows, while Google Container Registry offers a more streamlined approach with limited customization options.

In Summary, Google Container Registry and Quay.io differ in ownership, pricing, integrations, security features, region availability, and customization capabilities when it comes to container image storage and management.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Quay.io	Google Container Registry
Simply upload your Dockerfile (and any additional files it needs) and we'll build your Dockerfile into an image and push it to your repository.	It is a single place for your team to manage Docker images, perform vulnerability analysis, and decide who can access what with fine-grained access control.
Secure - Your data is transferred using SSL at all times and encrypted when at rest. More information available in our security guide;Shareable - Have to share a repository? No problem! Share with anyone you choose;Cloud Hosted - Accessible from anywhere, anytime	Secure, private Docker registry; Build and deploy automatically; In-depth vulnerability scanning
Statistics
Stacks 64	Stacks 52
Followers 86	Followers 19
Votes 7	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Great UI 1 API 0 Docker cloud repositories are public by default. Bad	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Quay.io, Google Container Registry?

Harbor

Harbor is an open source cloud native registry that stores, signs, and scans container images for vulnerabilities. Harbor solves common challenges by delivering trust, compliance, performance, and interoperability. It fills a gap for organ

Amazon ECR

It is a fully managed container registry that makes it easy to store, manage, share, and deploy your container images and artifacts anywhere. It eliminates the need to operate your own container repositories or worry about scaling the underlying infrastructure.

Kraken by Uber

A P2P-powered Docker registry that focuses on scalability and availability. It is designed for Docker image management, replication and distribution in a hybrid cloud environment.

Amazon Elastic Container Registry Public

It is a fully managed registry that makes it easy for a developer to publicly share container software worldwide for anyone to download. Anyone (with or without an AWS account) can use it to pull container software for use. Amazon ECR Public Gallery is a website that allows anyone to browse and search for public container images, view developer-provided details, and see pull commands. Developers no longer need to use different private and public registries when building and sharing their public container artifacts.

Gandalf

We provide a secure private registry where users can host their docker images and share them privately and securely within teams.

Related Comparisons

Google Container Registry vs Quay.io: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Google Container Registry and Quay.io.

Ownership and Provider: Google Container Registry is provided by Google Cloud Platform, while Quay.io is a product of Red Hat, which offers support for private and public repositories with flexibility in deployment options.
Pricing Structure: Google Container Registry has a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on storage and data egress, whereas Quay.io offers a tiered pricing structure based on the number of users and storage capacity, which includes a free tier for open-source projects.
Integration with Third-Party Tools: Google Container Registry integrates seamlessly with Google Cloud services like Kubernetes Engine, Cloud Build, and Cloud Run, while Quay.io provides integrations with various platforms such as Jenkins, GitHub, and Bitbucket.
Authentication and Security Features: Google Container Registry uses Google Cloud IAM for access control and provides VPC Service Controls for additional security, while Quay.io offers features like Webhooks, Robot Accounts, and Single Sign-On for authentication and security.
Region Availability: Google Container Registry is available in multiple regions worldwide, allowing users to choose the location closest to their deployment, whereas Quay.io offers global availability but limits the storage location to the United States only.
Customization and Extensibility: Quay.io allows users to customize and extend functionalities through plugins and custom scripts, providing more flexibility in workflows, while Google Container Registry offers a more streamlined approach with limited customization options.

Google Container Registry vs Quay.io

Overview