Alternatives to Gravit logo

Alternatives to Gravit

Inkscape, Sketch, Affinity, Figma, and Affinity Designer are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Gravit.
20
28
+ 1
2

What is Gravit and what are its top alternatives?

Gravit is a design tool for Mac, Windows, Linux, ChromeOS and the Browser made in the spirit for Freehand and Fireworks. It is completely written in HTML5, Javascript and CSS3. Gravit consists of the core engine called "Infinity", the actual Application and the core Module called "Gravit".
Gravit is a tool in the Open Source Design Tools category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Gravit

  • Inkscape

    Inkscape

    It is professional quality vector graphics software which runs on Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. This software can be used to create or edit vector graphics such as illustrations, diagrams, line arts, charts, logos and complex paintings. ...

  • Sketch

    Sketch

    Easily create complex shapes with our state-of-the-art vector boolean operations and take advantage of our extensive layer styles. ...

  • Affinity

    Affinity

    It is the most powerful platform built to help you leverage your most valuable asset, your network. Using patented technology, It instantly surfaces the important relationship data hidden in your team's communication streams and reveals actionable insights. ...

  • Figma

    Figma

    Figma is the first interface design tool with real-time collaboration. It keeps everyone on the same page. Focus on the work instead of fighting your tools. ...

  • Affinity Designer

    Affinity Designer

    No bloat, no gimmicks, just all the tools you need, implemented how you always dreamed. It is a stripped back, pro-end workhorse that will always get your job done. It was created to thrive on the electric pace of the latest computing hardware. Live, responsive and incredibly fluid, it’s simply a joy to use. ...

  • React Sketch.app

    React Sketch.app

    Managing the assets of design systems in Sketch is complex, error-prone and time consuming. Sketch is scriptable, but the API often changes. React provides the perfect wrapper to build reusable documents in a way already familiar to JavaScript developers. ...

  • Clarity Design System

    Clarity Design System

    UX guidelines, HTML/CSS framework, and Angular components working together to craft exceptional experiences. Start building with our HTML/CSS framework and rapidly go from prototype to production. ...

  • Sizzy

    Sizzy

    Sizzy is a tool for developing responsive websites crazy-fast. It allows you to preview a URL on multiple devices at once, filter the devices, zoom them in and out, and more. ...

Gravit alternatives & related posts

Inkscape logo

Inkscape

65
43
4
An open source vector graphics editor
65
43
+ 1
4

related Inkscape posts

related Sketch posts

Priit Kaasik
Engineering Lead at Katana MRP · | 8 upvotes · 377.2K views

How we ended up choosing Confluence as our internal web / wiki / documentation platform at Katana.

It happened because we chose Bitbucket over GitHub . We had Katana's first hackaton to assemble and test product engineering platform. It turned out that at that time you could have Bitbucket's private repositories and a team of five people for free - Done!

This decision led us to using Bitbucket pipelines for CI, Jira for Kanban, and finally, Confluence. We also use Microsoft Office 365 and started with using OneNote, but SharePoint is still a nightmare product to use to collaborate, so OneNote had to go.

Now, when thinking of the key value of Confluence to Katana then it is Product Requirements Management. We use Page Properties macros, integrations (with Slack , InVision, Sketch etc.) to manage Product Roadmap, flash out Epic and User Stories.

We ended up with using Confluence because it is the best fit for our current engineering ecosystem.

See more
Affinity logo

Affinity

16
13
0
A relationship intelligence platform built to expand and evolve the traditional CRM
16
13
+ 1
0
PROS OF AFFINITY
    No pros available
    CONS OF AFFINITY
      No cons available

      related Affinity posts

      related Figma posts

      Adam Neary

      The tool we use for editing UI is React Storybook. It is the perfect place to make sure your work aligns with designs to the pixel across breakpoints. You get fast hot module reloading and a couple checkboxes to enable/disable browser features like Flexbox.

      The only tricks I apply to Storybook are loading the stories with the mock data we’ve extracted from the API. If your mock data really covers all the various various possible states for your UI, you are good to go. Beyond that, if you have alternative states you want to account for, perhaps loading or error states, you can add them in manually.

      This is the crux of the matter for Storybook. This file is entirely generated from Yeoman (discussed below), and it delivers the examples from the Alps Journey by default. getSectionsFromJourney() just filters the sections.

      One other hack you’ll notice is that I added a pair of divs to bookend my component vertically, since Storybook renders with whitespace around the component. That is fine for buttons or UI with borders, but it’s hard to tell precisely where your component starts and ends, so I hacked them in there.

      Since we are talking about how all these fabulous tools work so well together to help you be productive, can I just say what a delight it is to work on UI with Zeplin or Figma side by side with Storybook. Digging into UI in this abstract way takes all the chaos of this madcap world away one breakpoint at a time, and in that quiet realm, you are good down to the pixel every time.

      To supply Storybook and our unit tests with realistic mock data, we want to extract the mock data directly from our Shared Development Environment. As with codegen, even a small change in a query fragment should also trigger many small changes in mock data. And here, similarly, the hard part is tackled entirely by Apollo CLI, and you can stitch it together with your own code in no time.

      Coming back to Zeplin and Figma briefly, they're both built to allow engineers to extract content directly to facilitate product development.

      Extracting the copy for an entire paragraph is as simple as selecting the content in Zeplin and clicking the “copy” icon in the Content section of the sidebar. In the case of Zeplin, images can be extracted by selecting and clicking the “download” icon in the Assets section of the sidebar.

      ReactDesignStack #StorybookStack #StorybookDesignStack
      See more
      Lucas Litton
      Director of Strategy at DigitalSignal · | 1 upvote · 22.2K views

      We chose Figma because of the collaboration aspect of it. We are able to work as a team to create designs for web apps, mobile apps, and alike. After creating our designs in Figma we start exporting the assets and designs over to Webflow and Supernova.

      See more
      Affinity Designer logo

      Affinity Designer

      92
      65
      8
      A vector graphics editor developed for macOS, iOS, and Microsoft Windows
      92
      65
      + 1
      8

      related Affinity Designer posts

      React Sketch.app logo

      React Sketch.app

      62
      143
      0
      Render React components to Sketch ⚛️💎
      62
      143
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF REACT SKETCH.APP
        No pros available
        CONS OF REACT SKETCH.APP
          No cons available

          related React Sketch.app posts

          Clarity Design System logo

          Clarity Design System

          19
          69
          14
          UI controls and design system for Angular
          19
          69
          + 1
          14

          related Clarity Design System posts

          Sizzy logo

          Sizzy

          18
          38
          0
          A tool for developing responsive websites crazy-fast
          18
          38
          + 1
          0
          PROS OF SIZZY
            No pros available
            CONS OF SIZZY
              No cons available

              related Sizzy posts