StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Gunicorn vs Ratchet PHP

Gunicorn vs Ratchet PHP

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K
Ratchet PHP
Ratchet PHP
Stacks8
Followers27
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.4K
Forks792

Gunicorn vs Ratchet PHP: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Gunicorn and Ratchet PHP are both tools used in web development, but they differ in their functionality and purpose. Below are the key differences between Gunicorn and Ratchet PHP:

  1. Performance: Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model server for Python web applications, while Ratchet PHP is a PHP library for creating real-time applications. Gunicorn is known for its high performance and the ability to handle high traffic loads efficiently. It is optimized for Python applications and can be used with various frameworks. On the other hand, Ratchet PHP provides real-time communication capabilities such as WebSockets and server-side events, allowing developers to build interactive and dynamic applications.

  2. Language Compatibility: Gunicorn is specifically designed for Python applications and is compatible only with Python-based frameworks. It can seamlessly integrate with frameworks like Django, Flask, and Pyramid. Ratchet PHP, on the other hand, is designed for PHP applications and is compatible with PHP-based frameworks like Symfony, Laravel, and CodeIgniter.

  3. Concurrency Model: Gunicorn follows a pre-fork worker model, where it spawns multiple worker processes to handle incoming requests. Each worker process has its own Python interpreter and memory space, allowing parallel processing of requests. This model helps in utilizing the available system resources efficiently and improves the overall performance. Ratchet PHP, on the other hand, follows an event-driven model, where it uses non-blocking I/O operations to handle multiple client connections. This allows for scalable and efficient handling of real-time communication.

  4. Deployment: Gunicorn is commonly used in production environments and is often deployed behind a reverse proxy server like Nginx. It can be easily integrated into existing infrastructure and provides features like load balancing and process management. Ratchet PHP, on the other hand, is used for building server-side applications that require real-time communication. It can be run as a standalone server or integrated into existing PHP applications.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Gunicorn has a large and active community of developers, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and a wide range of third-party libraries and plugins available. It is a well-established tool with a strong ecosystem, making it easier to find support and resources. Ratchet PHP also has a growing community, but it may have a slightly smaller ecosystem compared to Gunicorn.

  6. Ease of Use: Gunicorn is relatively easy to set up and configure, with straightforward command-line options and configuration settings. It provides default settings that work well for most use cases, making it ideal for beginners. Ratchet PHP requires some knowledge of event-driven programming and real-time communication concepts. It may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are new to asynchronous programming.

Summary:

In summary, Gunicorn is a high-performance server for Python web applications, while Ratchet PHP is a PHP library for creating real-time applications. Gunicorn follows a pre-fork worker model and is optimized for Python-based frameworks, while Ratchet PHP follows an event-driven model and is designed for PHP applications. Gunicorn has a larger community and ecosystem, making it easier to find support and resources, while Ratchet PHP offers real-time communication capabilities like WebSockets.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Ratchet PHP
Ratchet PHP

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

It is a loosely coupled PHP library providing developers with tools to create real time, bi-directional applications between clients and servers over WebSockets.

-
Fast & Easy; Components; Compatible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Stars
6.4K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
792
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
8
Followers
908
Followers
27
Votes
78
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Light
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Git
Git
PHP
PHP
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
phpPgAdmin
phpPgAdmin

What are some alternatives to Gunicorn, Ratchet PHP?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase