StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Gunicorn

Apache Tomcat vs Gunicorn

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Stacks1.3K
Followers908
Votes78
GitHub Stars10.3K
Forks1.8K
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K

Apache Tomcat vs Gunicorn: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache Tomcat and Gunicorn

Apache Tomcat and Gunicorn are both widely used server software for hosting web applications, but they have some key differences. Here are the main differences between the two:

  1. Architecture: Apache Tomcat is a web server and servlet container, specifically designed for Java-based web applications. It can handle Java Servlets, JavaServer Pages (JSP), and other Java-based technologies. On the other hand, Gunicorn is a web server specifically designed for running Python web applications. It supports the WSGI protocol and can run any WSGI-compliant application.

  2. Language Support: Apache Tomcat is primarily used for hosting Java-based web applications and provides native support for Java technologies. It can run any application written in Java, including frameworks like Spring and Struts. Gunicorn, on the other hand, is tailored for Python web applications. It can run Django, Flask, and other Python frameworks without any additional configurations.

  3. Concurrency Model: Apache Tomcat follows a threaded model for handling multiple concurrent requests. It uses a thread pool to process requests in parallel, with each thread handling a single request at a time. In contrast, Gunicorn follows a pre-fork model, where multiple worker processes are created to handle requests. Each worker process runs in its own memory space and can handle multiple requests simultaneously.

  4. Scalability: Apache Tomcat can be easily scaled vertically by adding more server resources like CPU power and memory. It can also be clustered to achieve horizontal scalability, where multiple Tomcat instances work together to handle a higher load. On the other hand, Gunicorn can be scaled horizontally by running multiple instances of the server behind a load balancer. Each Gunicorn instance can be deployed on a separate server to handle a specific number of requests.

  5. Configuration: Apache Tomcat has an XML-based configuration format, where various settings and parameters are specified in XML files. It provides fine-grained control over the server configuration, but it can be complex for beginners. Gunicorn, on the other hand, uses a simple command-line interface and relies on configuration files written in Python. It provides a more intuitive and easy-to-use configuration system.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Apache Tomcat has a large and active community of developers and users, with a vast ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools built around it. It has been around for a long time and is widely adopted by enterprises. Gunicorn, although not as popular as Tomcat, has a growing community of Python developers and a decent ecosystem of Python web frameworks and utilities.

In summary, Apache Tomcat is a Java-focused web server and servlet container, while Gunicorn is a Python-focused web server. They have different architectures, language support, concurrency models, scalability options, configuration systems, and communities/ecosystems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Gunicorn, Apache Tomcat

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Gunicorn
Gunicorn
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.3K
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Forks
1.8K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
16.9K
Followers
908
Followers
12.6K
Votes
78
Votes
201
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 34
    Python
  • 30
    Easy setup
  • 8
    Reliable
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Light
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up

What are some alternatives to Gunicorn, Apache Tomcat?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase