GWT vs Omi

Overview

GWT

Stacks88

Followers100

Votes0

Omi

Stacks82

Followers16

Votes0

GitHub Stars13.2K

Forks1.3K

GWT vs Omi: What are the differences?

Developers describe GWT as "*An open-source set of tools to create and maintain complex JavaScript front-end applications *". It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript. On the other hand, Omi is detailed as "Next generation web framework in 4KB JavaScript (Web Components + JSX + Proxy + Path Updating)". Tiny size(4KB gzip). Reactive data-binding. Based on Shadow Dom. Shadow DOM merges with Virtual DOM, Omi uses both virtual DOM and real Shadow DOM to make view updates more accurate and faster.

GWT belongs to "Javascript MVC Frameworks" category of the tech stack, while Omi can be primarily classified under "Javascript UI Libraries".

Omi is an open source tool with 9.43K GitHub stars and 857 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Omi's open source repository on GitHub.

🔥 Trending in UI Components on StackShare

FigForm UI Components

FigForm

Try it View Docs Alternatives

Try

1

2

Detailed Comparison

GWT	Omi
It is a development toolkit for building and optimizing complex browser-based applications. Its goal is to enable productive development of high-performance web applications without the developer having to be an expert in browser quirks, XMLHttpRequest, and JavaScript.	Tiny size(4KB gzip). Reactive data-binding. Based on Shadow Dom. Shadow DOM merges with Virtual DOM, Omi uses both virtual DOM and real Shadow DOM to make view updates more accurate and faster.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 13.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 1.3K
Stacks 88	Stacks 82
Followers 100	Followers 16
Votes 0	Votes 0

What are some alternatives to GWT, Omi?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.