StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Background Processing
  5. Hangfire vs PHP-FPM

Hangfire vs PHP-FPM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Stacks121
Followers119
Votes0
Hangfire
Hangfire
Stacks333
Followers249
Votes17
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks1.7K

Hangfire vs PHP-FPM: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will compare Hangfire and PHP-FPM, focusing on their key differences. Hangfire is a task scheduling framework for .NET applications, while PHP-FPM is a FastCGI process manager for PHP. Both have their own unique characteristics and functionalities.

  1. Architecture: Hangfire is designed to work with .NET applications and use Microsoft technologies such as ASP.NET and SQL Server for scheduling and background job processing. On the other hand, PHP-FPM is specifically built for managing and processing PHP scripts in a FastCGI environment.

  2. Language Compatibility: Hangfire is compatible with .NET languages like C#, F#, and Visual Basic. PHP-FPM, as the name suggests, is tailored for PHP scripts and works seamlessly with PHP-based web applications.

  3. Job Queue Management: Hangfire provides a built-in persistent job queue that can be used to enqueue, manage, and process background jobs. It offers multiple storage options such as SQL Server, Redis, and more. PHP-FPM, on the other hand, does not offer job queue management as it mainly focuses on processing PHP scripts through FastCGI.

  4. Platform Dependency: Hangfire is specifically designed for .NET applications, meaning it is platform-dependent and can only be used with .NET framework or .NET Core implementations. In contrast, PHP-FPM is platform-independent as long as the web server supports FastCGI.

  5. Job Scheduling: Hangfire offers a powerful task scheduling system that allows developers to schedule recurring tasks, delayed tasks, and fire-and-forget tasks with ease. PHP-FPM, being a FastCGI process manager, does not provide native job scheduling capabilities.

  6. Performance and Scalability: Hangfire is highly scalable and provides excellent performance when used with the appropriate storage options. It can handle a large number of background jobs efficiently. On the other hand, PHP-FPM is optimized for processing PHP scripts and can efficiently handle concurrent PHP script requests with the right server configuration.

In summary, Hangfire is a task scheduling framework for .NET applications with built-in job queue management and scheduling capabilities. It is platform-dependent and designed specifically for .NET languages. On the other hand, PHP-FPM is a FastCGI process manager tailored for processing PHP scripts in a platform-independent manner. It does not offer job queue management or scheduling features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PHP-FPM
PHP-FPM
Hangfire
Hangfire

It is an alternative PHP FastCGI implementation with some additional features useful for sites of any size, especially busier sites. It includes Adaptive process spawning, Advanced process management with graceful stop/start, Emergency restart in case of accidental opcode cache destruction etc.

It is an open-source framework that helps you to create, process and manage your background jobs, i.e. operations you don't want to put in your request processing pipeline. It supports all kind of background tasks – short-running and long-running, CPU intensive and I/O intensive, one shot and recurrent.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
121
Stacks
333
Followers
119
Followers
249
Votes
0
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Integrated UI dashboard
  • 5
    Simple
  • 3
    Robust
  • 2
    In Memory
  • 0
    Simole

What are some alternatives to PHP-FPM, Hangfire?

Sidekiq

Sidekiq

Sidekiq uses threads to handle many jobs at the same time in the same process. It does not require Rails but will integrate tightly with Rails 3/4 to make background processing dead simple.

Beanstalkd

Beanstalkd

Beanstalks's interface is generic, but was originally designed for reducing the latency of page views in high-volume web applications by running time-consuming tasks asynchronously.

Resque

Resque

Background jobs can be any Ruby class or module that responds to perform. Your existing classes can easily be converted to background jobs or you can create new classes specifically to do work. Or, you can do both.

delayed_job

delayed_job

Delayed_job (or DJ) encapsulates the common pattern of asynchronously executing longer tasks in the background. It is a direct extraction from Shopify where the job table is responsible for a multitude of core tasks.

Faktory

Faktory

Redis -> Sidekiq == Faktory -> Faktory. Faktory is a server daemon which provides a simple API to produce and consume background jobs. Jobs are a small JSON hash with a few mandatory keys.

Kue

Kue

Kue is a feature rich priority job queue for node.js backed by redis. A key feature of Kue is its clean user-interface for viewing and managing queued, active, failed, and completed jobs.

Bull

Bull

The fastest, most reliable, Redis-based queue for Node. Carefully written for rock solid stability and atomicity.

Cron

Cron

Background-only application which launches and runs other applications, or opens documents, at specified dates and times.

Que

Que

Que is a high-performance alternative to DelayedJob or QueueClassic that improves the reliability of your application by protecting your jobs with the same ACID guarantees as the rest of your data.

Goose

Goose

It is a simple, reliable & scalable background processing library for Clojure. It has a transparent design & cloud-native architecture.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase