StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Jersey vs hapi

Jersey vs hapi

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

hapi
hapi
Stacks434
Followers456
Votes87
Jersey
Jersey
Stacks217
Followers125
Votes6

hapi vs Jersey: What are the differences?

Developers describe hapi as "Server Framework for Node.js". hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services. On the other hand, Jersey is detailed as "*A REST framework that provides a JAX-RS implementation *". It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

hapi and Jersey can be primarily classified as "Microframeworks (Backend)" tools.

hapi is an open source tool with 11.3K GitHub stars and 1.16K GitHub forks. Here's a link to hapi's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, hapi has a broader approval, being mentioned in 68 company stacks & 196 developers stacks; compared to Jersey, which is listed in 7 company stacks and 11 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

hapi
hapi
Jersey
Jersey

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

-
Track the JAX-RS API and provide regular releases of production quality Reference Implementations that ships with GlassFish; Provide APIs to extend Jersey & Build a community of users and developers; Make it easy to build RESTful Web services utilizing Java and the Java Virtual Machine.
Statistics
Stacks
434
Stacks
217
Followers
456
Followers
125
Votes
87
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 27
    Makes me Hapi making REST APIs
  • 14
    Configuration
  • 14
    Simpler than other REST libraries
  • 13
    Quality Driven Ecosystem
  • 13
    Modularization
Pros
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Java standard
  • 1
    Fast Performance With Microservices
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Oracle
Oracle
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse

What are some alternatives to hapi, Jersey?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase