StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Orm
  5. Hibernate vs NHibernate

Hibernate vs NHibernate

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hibernate
Hibernate
Stacks1.8K
Followers1.2K
Votes34
GitHub Stars0
Forks0
NHibernate
NHibernate
Stacks116
Followers92
Votes5
GitHub Stars2.2K
Forks930

Hibernate vs NHibernate: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Hibernate and NHibernate. Hibernate and NHibernate are both popular Object Relational Mapping (ORM) frameworks used in Java and .NET respectively. They aim to bridge the gap between object-oriented programming and relational databases, making it easier to work with database operations.

  1. Database Compatibility: The primary difference between Hibernate and NHibernate lies in their database compatibility. Hibernate is built specifically for Java and works seamlessly with all major databases, including MySQL, Oracle, and SQL Server. On the other hand, NHibernate is designed for .NET framework and supports databases like SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL. This difference arises due to the platform-specific nature of both frameworks.

  2. Development Environment: Another significant difference is the development environment for Hibernate and NHibernate. Hibernate is tightly integrated with Java development tools like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA, providing seamless support for code generation, debugging, and automatic mapping configuration. NHibernate, being a .NET framework, integrates well with Visual Studio and offers similar development support for .NET developers.

  3. Configuration Flexibility: Hibernate and NHibernate also differ in terms of configuration flexibility. Hibernate provides a rich set of configuration options, allowing developers to fine-tune various aspects of the ORM framework. It provides support for XML-based and annotation-based configuration, giving developers choice and flexibility. On the other hand, NHibernate primarily relies on XML-based configuration, which may be seen as more verbose compared to Hibernate's annotation-based approach.

  4. Performance Optimization: Performance optimization is another key difference between Hibernate and NHibernate. Hibernate has been in development for a longer period and has a more mature codebase. It has a robust mechanism for optimizing database operations, including techniques like caching, lazy loading, and batching. NHibernate, being a .NET implementation of Hibernate, may not offer the same level of performance optimization out of the box, although it shares many similarities.

  5. Community and Support: The community and support around Hibernate and NHibernate differ to some extent. Hibernate has a larger and more established community, with a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and online resources available. It has been widely adopted and has a strong backing from the Java developer community. NHibernate, being a .NET-specific framework, may have a slightly smaller community but still offers good support and resources for .NET developers working with ORM.

  6. Licensing: Hibernate and NHibernate differ in their licensing models. Hibernate is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), which allows for a broader range of usage and distribution. NHibernate, on the other hand, is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL), which has stricter requirements for usage and commercial distribution.

In summary, the key differences between Hibernate and NHibernate lie in their database compatibility, development environment, configuration flexibility, performance optimization, community and support, and licensing. These differences arise due to the platform-specific nature of the frameworks, leading to variations in features, integrations, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Hibernate
Hibernate
NHibernate
NHibernate

Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

It is a mature, open source object-relational mapper for the .NET framework. It's actively developed, fully featured and used in thousands of successful projects.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Stars
2.2K
GitHub Forks
0
GitHub Forks
930
Stacks
1.8K
Stacks
116
Followers
1.2K
Followers
92
Votes
34
Votes
5
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 22
    Easy ORM
  • 8
    Easy transaction definition
  • 3
    Is integrated with spring jpa
  • 1
    Open Source
Cons
  • 3
    Can't control proxy associations when entity graph used
Pros
  • 5
    DDD friendly
Integrations
Java
Java
.NET
.NET
Visual Studio
Visual Studio
C#
C#

What are some alternatives to Hibernate, NHibernate?

Sequelize

Sequelize

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Prisma

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

MikroORM

MikroORM

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

Entity Framework

Entity Framework

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

peewee

peewee

A small, expressive orm, written in python (2.6+, 3.2+), with built-in support for sqlite, mysql and postgresql and special extensions like hstore.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Entity Framework Core

Entity Framework Core

It is a lightweight, extensible, open source and cross-platform version of the popular Entity Framework data access technology. It can serve as an object-relational mapper (O/RM), enabling .NET developers to work with a database using .NET objects, and eliminating the need for most of the data-access code they usually need to write.

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

Dapper

Dapper

It is an object-relational mapping product for the Microsoft.NET platform: it provides a framework for mapping an object-oriented domain model to a traditional relational database.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase